1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

IronFx victims: report here of your pending withdrawal requests

Discussion in 'Scam Alerts' started by marc56, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. marc56

    marc56 Private, 1st Class

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2017
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    10
    We know that there are thousands of clients whose withrawal requests are not executed by IronFx.

    Pending withdrawal request do not only affect old clients, who have been waiting for their money since early 2015, but new clients as well.

    IronFx refuses to return funds to clients in a widespread an systematic manner.

    Please report here about your pending withdrawal request
     
    4evermaat likes this.
  2. marc56

    marc56 Private, 1st Class

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2017
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    10
    I am from Italy. May withdrawal request of about 10000,- € has been pending since March 2015
     
    Alphabeta likes this.
  3. IRONFXSCAM

    IRONFXSCAM Private

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    57
    I'm from Italy. My withdrawal request of 22000 has been pending since august 2015!
     
  4. luxotik

    luxotik Private

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    4
    My account
    17017935 2015-06-30 WBME87BGLXNQR8TM Withdrawal – Bank €21000 Waiting for Processing
     
  5. AsstModerator

    AsstModerator FPA Forums and Reviews Admin

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    5,054
    Likes Received:
    972
  6. KUN CHENG TSENG

    KUN CHENG TSENG Recruit

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    2
    I made withdrawal request on 07/06/2015, received the decision letter from financial ombudsman on 12/07/2017, and yet receive my trading deposit.Please make the adjust for me,all the money it's my make very hard to earn,i will appreciate to all of your help,thanks!( The detail can see the attachment)
     

    Attached Files:

    oscarra likes this.
  7. IronFX Officer

    IronFX Officer IronFx Representative

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    6
    Dear all,

    Thank you for your continuing posts and comments.

    Your constructive approach is appreciated and welcomed as it provides a sensible discussion forum for us to engage using facts rather than hearsay.

    Please understand our position in clearing what was indeed proven to be a multitude of repeated hostile, baseless and defamatory allegations by non-clients. This sometimes required us to take a forcefully factual approach in order to stop purely defamatory threads without a valid client claim.

    In our effort at FPA we have answered all threads with facts. We have identified all real clients and successfully dealt with their claims. We have also answered to a multitude of postings by non-clients. You may have noticed that these postings are just the same things going round and round and round in a merry and baseless go-round.

    The undisputed facts are:

    1. We have been operational for 8 years, one of the longest established global Brokers.

    2. We are regulated by the four premier regulators in the FX world (FCA, ASIC, CySEC and FSB) with full licencing and with an absolutely clean record of conduct. No fines and no warnings whatsoever. To this effect, we don’t think that e.g. the FCA would turn a blind eye to any misdemeanours.

    3. We never breached any Capital Adequacy requirements in any of our regulated jurisdictions.

    4. We have had the same auditors since inception with a clean audit record throughout.

    5. We have not had a single Court judgement in any jurisdiction against us.

    6. The “huge number of complaints” respond to a mere 0.2% of our client base, most are old and have been dealt with.

    7. We have passed significant due diligence as part of various investment processes in our 8 years of operations. This has culminated in the recent investment by a regulated fund in our company.

    The allegations merry go round (same things posted again and again in different threads) are as follows and concern 10 repeated statements which are presented below in no particular order:

    1. “$176m in lost client funds”: see points (2) and (4) in the list above. We are one of the few Brokers that hold the client funds on-balance sheet and are therefore audited. Some regulators e.g. FCA also require daily reconciliations. The Auditor General’s report was a report by a non-expert criticising primarily CySEC processes. This was spun out as “confirmation of a $176m hole”. We have taken measures since to correct this misunderstanding but unfortunately the report cannot be retracted as it is a mammoth annual report covering all departments of the Cyprus Government.

    2. “Petitions in the European Parliament”: As you rightly point out, the fact that no one has signed the petition “in the last 5 days,” points out the defamatory nature of these allegations. Please also note that the last petition to the European Parliament in July 2017 plainly confirmed the sole jurisdiction of the Republic of Cyprus in dealing with any complaints against CySEC regulated entities. The statutes on National Sovereignty are very clear and any additional petitions (if ever lodged) will have a similar fate.

    3. “German criminal cases against members of management”: to-date we are not aware of any cases against management. The German document that appeared in some of the threads was just a confirmation that no case exists. It was misrepresented as being a criminal case against management. On the contrary, we have won a seminal defamation case at the Munich Court against a paid-for defamator and we have obtained a cease-and-desist order.

    4. “Clients are consumers”: we have won seminal court cases in this respect. The EU law is clear in this respect that clients are not consumers. The Cyprus Consumer Protection Service opinion was just an unfortunate and wrongful interpretation of the legal framework. We have initiate legal action in this respect. We also stress that this is not a Court decision.

    5. “Unpaid rents”: against a misrepresentation of the decision of the Junior Court in Cyprus in a simple rent dispute. This was overturned in our favour at the High Court.

    6. “BBC documentary”: this is purely a defamatory attempt by a disgruntled ex-client that happened to be an ex-BBC employee. Was spun out as a “BBC documentary”. No BBC documentaries exist on the subject matter and indeed no articles exist in the mainstream press (other than positive articles in e.g. FT or Wall Street Journal).

    7. “Class action lawsuits”: we confirm none is in existence and we have never been notified of one. A couple of comments in threads concern shady law firms trying to procure unsuspecting clients. They never get anywhere as there are no real claims and no one is willing to pay legal fees.

    8. “Legal action against one of our lawyers”: we have global operations and we engage a multitude a legal firms (c. 30 globally). We cannot comment on individual law firms and any case against a law firm is clearly not a misdemeanour against the company.

    9. “€335,000 fine”: this was a settlement with CySEC following their investigation of the 10-largest Cyprus Brokers in 2015. No party admitted wrongdoing and the matter is closed since November 2015. IronFX was the only company under investigation that did not receive a fine. All the remaining Brokers in the investigation received fines.

    10. “Amazon Book”: this a free book that it is just a write-up of the points above. We have no additional comments as to the motives.

    As you can see, facts pay a very clear picture of an organised defamation attempt.

    As per FPA member @BinaryLad suggested, in thread http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/ironfx-com.14830/page-5, we welcome your suggestion for a “falsely accused broker” section where we can post final and factual responses for the 10 false allegations above that get repeated throughout the FPA threads.

    For any other issues or repeated defamatory commentary or false allegations you want to post on the FPA site please refer to the “IronFX – Falsely Accused Broker” thread: http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/ironfx-falsely-accused-broker.54115/

    We would also expect this effort will result in the removal of the “Scam Broker” rating by the FPA.

    Regards,
     
  8. KUN CHENG TSENG

    KUN CHENG TSENG Recruit

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    2
    To ironfx officer:
    According the financial ombudsman disision ,ironfx did not return my withdraw! It’s very unrespect to ombudsman and me. You just write down the canned massage here, I think it cannot convinces all the investor of forex! Please return my money and respect the result of ombudsman and all of the victims of the ironfx!
     
  9. IRONFXSCAM

    IRONFXSCAM Private

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    57

    Attached Files:

  10. IronFX Officer

    IronFX Officer IronFx Representative

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    6
    Dear marc56,

    Thank you for your comment.

    We refer you to our last reply relating to your case and your attempt to conceal information as to the true facts of your case.

    Please look at the link below, post #68:
    http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/ironfx-whistleblower-corner.53703/page-7

    Thank you

    Dear marc56,

    Thank you for your comment.

    We refer you to our last reply relating to your case and your attempt to conceal information as to the true facts of your case.

    Please look at the link below, post #68:
    http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/ironfx-whistleblower-corner.53703/page-7

    Thank you
     

Share This Page