Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Long
While we're at it, I think you should start off every one of these scam investigations by asking the complainee, "why they chose to place their money in an obscure bucket shop, rather than a large regulated broker?", when plenty of them are readily available, and "why they think you should be working to bail them out?".
|
LMAO!!! I might need a new job if that rule went into effect.
I find offshore brokers easier to deal with. Those that reply to emails come up with strange things like Alma Forex does or they decide to negotiate seriously. Many cases are resolved very quietly. Regulated brokers frequently decide to hide behind the NFA and won't discuss things openly.
Nicholas finally told me his version of why he could pay out the initial balance. This still doesn't explain why he's holding onto profits. He said...
Quote:
The database we work with has about twenty risk categories. For each of them there are list of possible actions. In case of Mr. Arapoglu’s
category we have made maximum what we could – repayment in full.
|
He's saying that Ahmet's suspicious money can be returned in full, but gives no reason why the profits made with this money can't. I would think that the suspicious money would be more likely to be confiscated under AML laws than profits made using it.