Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBluePrince
A micro account might give worse results because the commission and spread may be higher as a percent than trading full lots. I'm not sure, but that seems likely. Anyway, if I do trade live it will be with Interactive Brokers who have better commissions and spreads than the forex brokers.
|
I dont think IB has a MetaTrader platform. Their better commisions and spreads are based on account size and volume, without that you will be charged an additional monthly fee.
.................................................. ..
Backtesting and demo testing should always be prerequisits to live testing. Although they are less accurate, they will show how an
EA trades under ideal conditions, and there are too many EA's being sold that cannot trade properly under any conditions.
In most cases a simple backtest will show enough about the EA's trading style and profitability to eliminate most of them. Whereas, the forward test on demo will allow you to evaluate the EA running on multiple currencies or alongside other EA's. All very important considerations before you place one on a live account.
.................................................. ...
I've owned FAP-T since it came out Nov 25, 08. I've had it on several accounts in that time, but I dont currently run it on a live account. I find it too unreliable. Every time it gets going with a good run it takes a bad loss and wipes out the gains. I've been running it on a 5K demo at GallantFX, using the FAP-T Experts Guide settings since Oct. At one point it was up by $1500, but it lost this and has been below 5K ever since. This EA has enormous potential, but it also has a high degree of risk, and the pairs it trades are the worst choices for most accounts.