• Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.

    Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.

    Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"

    Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"

    Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"

    Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
    Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.

    More info coming soon.

Problem Pepperstone cancelled my trades

I am having an issue with a company
Regulator will investigate on this.... the good thing is money are GAINS... i've already withdrew everything.....so i can wait ENDLESS time... and fight them....

You mean withdrew deposit and the scammed are the profits?
 
They cannot know what your EA is doing internally so they cannot prove what they claim. I suggest you push them to give you your profit back or to give you proof of their claims...
 
Why ECN/STP brokers lost money if they were not actually Market Makers?

Their whole system proved to be a big failure.

Even if a broker is an ECN in this case ( unique CHF case ) there was not liquidity in the system to close the trade. The FXCM case and the losses they had show well this issue. So in this UNIQUE case was not the fault of brokers ( that usually try to scam us ). This case took the failure of broker fully regulated as Alpari Uk and other so I think now even brokers are victim of the " operative system " where the matching engines where unable to match the correct price due to zero liquidity in the electronic system. So even the broker will have problems with their liquidity providers ( banks )... but again this is a case more unique than rare.
 
Even if a broker is an ECN in this case ( unique CHF case ) there was not liquidity in the system to close the trade. The FXCM case and the losses they had show well this issue. So in this UNIQUE case was not the fault of brokers ( that usually try to scam us ). This case took the failure of broker fully regulated as Alpari Uk and other so I think now even brokers are victim of the " operative system " where the matching engines where unable to match the correct price due to zero liquidity in the electronic system. So even the broker will have problems with their liquidity providers ( banks )... but again this is a case more unique than rare.

Alexx, i don't agree a single word of what you say. I'm going to explain why:

1. How can a broker allow, if you read all the posts, to close traders 3 hours after the event?
2. Why the broker allowed to trades CHF without manage margin required since was so evident of the incoming event (SNB was buying a lot of currency, you can find on internet)
3. Explaing this: KPMG: Reviewing Alpari UK Trade Fills and Asking Customers to Cover Negative Balances (Alpari UK to ask client to cover negative balance WHY?)

And if you, again, read all my posts you can find Pepperstone talk about EA, price difference and so on...

So please BROKERS are never victims...
 
Even if a broker is an ECN in this case ( unique CHF case ) there was not liquidity in the system to close the trade. The FXCM case and the losses they had show well this issue. So in this UNIQUE case was not the fault of brokers ( that usually try to scam us ). This case took the failure of broker fully regulated as Alpari Uk and other so I think now even brokers are victim of the " operative system " where the matching engines where unable to match the correct price due to zero liquidity in the electronic system. So even the broker will have problems with their liquidity providers ( banks )... but again this is a case more unique than rare.

posters who defend brokers can't stop amazing me. After confessing its the broker bad operating system, no match engines no correct price and so on, they say not broker fault, isn't that nonsense.

Clients don't care what happens between LP's broker system broken and whatever, clients can be responsible of that, full responsibility goes to brokers.

Like others you'll fail to explain how other ecn/stp brokers filled stops 1.20 to 1.1980 applying its contract policy while others failed to do the same.
 
Alexx, i don't agree a single word of what you say. I'm going to explain why:

1. How can a broker allow, if you read all the posts, to close traders 3 hours after the event?
2. Why the broker allowed to trades CHF without manage margin required since was so evident of the incoming event (SNB was buying a lot of currency, you can find on internet)
3. Explaing this: KPMG: Reviewing Alpari UK Trade Fills and Asking Customers to Cover Negative Balances (Alpari UK to ask client to cover negative balance WHY?)

And if you, again, read all my posts you can find Pepperstone talk about EA, price difference and so on...

So please BROKERS are never victims...

I mean... if you, broker, as me to cover negative balance...you must give me profits..... behaviors MUST BE THE SAME
 
Back
Top