Continuefx is not paying my withdrawal for the amount of 20000$

The rules for reviews now do state that IBs and others with vested financial interests should not submit reviews. The old TC rules regarding the FPA not using IB agreements remain in effect. I supposed I should try to get the rules fully clarified.

Let's see where we are with those threads...

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/cannot-withdrawal-5-000-www-continuefx-com.58632/

The OP only made one post and does not have a review. I invited the OP back to the thread. So far, there has been no response. Would you take a case to a vote if the person filing it never came back even when directly invited?

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/continuefx-never-pay.58146/

He does have a review, but also never sent an invitation from his own thread. Again, read those invitations more closely. The only invitation posted says...

The FPA invited the Original Poster to update this discussion on Jan 29, 2019 at 10:07 PM

If he makes even one more reply in the thread, the invitation button would become active. Currently, all he has in his own thread is one post,

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...efx-com-refusing-to-withdraw-11000-usd.58066/

This thread shows a full set of invitations.

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...fx-continuefx-com-do-not-withdraw-funds.57970

Has a review. I'm now inviting both the company and the OP back to this thread. The OP has not updated it since he launched the formal invitation.

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...efx-com-refusing-to-withdraw-11000-usd.58066/

Invitations all issued and a review is posted.
 
He is clearly being given the run around. His questions to the broker is clear and concise ... the broker is not responding with clear and concise replied to satisfy his questions. Blocking his account is an admission that their attempts at fooling him with a nonsense answer did not work and they cannot continue with nonsense explanations. The only recourse is to shut him down and be rid of him, which is what they did. When a broker cannot answer you properly, is evasive and tries to confuse you with nonsense answers .. they are scammers.
 
He is clearly being given the run around. His questions to the broker is clear and concise ... the broker is not responding with clear and concise replied to satisfy his questions. Blocking his account is an admission that their attempts at fooling him with a nonsense answer did not work and they cannot continue with nonsense explanations. The only recourse is to shut him down and be rid of him, which is what they did. When a broker cannot answer you properly, is evasive and tries to confuse you with nonsense answers .. they are scammers.

you are right
it is few weeks that I opened this thread and I also invited the broker in several ways and also uploaded my evidences.
and the most interesting note here is that FPA is not making any action about about it becuase I am IB of another broker !!!!
I really can not understand what is the problem . anyway something is wrong here.
I hope FPA can do what it was doing like before.
other way I do not see any reason to follow up this well known and old website(FPA)
 
you are right
it is few weeks that I opened this thread and I also invited the broker in several ways and also uploaded my evidences.
and the most interesting note here is that FPA is not making any action about about it becuase I am IB of another broker !!!!
I really can not understand what is the problem . anyway something is wrong here.
I hope FPA can do what it was doing like before.
other way I do not see any reason to follow up this well known and old website(FPA)

FPA has taken action with other related cases and has opened up a traders court case. You should be able to cast your vote.

But the rule about your specific case is fair as they do not want a conflict of interest motive.
 
FPA has taken action with other related cases and has opened up a traders court case. You should be able to cast your vote.

But the rule about your specific case is fair as they do not want a conflict of interest motive.

the only thing that I am asking to take an action about my case in FPA Court too.
I really can not understand when you say that in my specific case it is fair !!!!!
I am like all other clients and I have big problem with this broker , not paying me my withdrawal with the amount of 20000$
and you are telling me it is fair ????????
 
^^ This has already been explained that because you are an IB for multiple brokers, it creates a conflict of interest.
You may have noticed the Scam Investigation Committee did mention your case:

An Additional Complaint to Note

There is an additional thread by an IB of ContinueFx here...

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...-my-withdrawal-for-the-amount-of-20000.58975/

Both the old and new FPA's Traders Court does not consider IB complaints, since non-trading business relationships are outside the scope of trader issues. In this case, the IB is a well known, longstanding FPA member, so we feel his complaint is worth reading.

The FPA has procedures for declaring a company to be a scam. Under the new procedures, a company can get a scam label faster. No new people need to be scammed. What's needed is for everyone complaining to follow the procedures.

1. Open a thread and leave a review.
2. Keep the thread active, post evidence, and invite the company.

FXFORME is an IB of multiple brokers, so has a vested financial interest. Therefor, his complaint can only be used as support, not as a primary item in any scam vote.

I do think the rules should be updated to show that the person complaining should be an individual or company that is only trading. If they are an IB, then their scam alert will be limited.

Should FXFORME open a new thread under a different username as an individual? Please advise.


So your thread could not be used directly towards the trader's count case. But because other people were having similar issues (and were able to follow the FPA rules), there is an active court case against FPA:

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...vote-on-continue-fx-results-under-vote.59225/

You may vote if you want to.
 
^^ This has already been explained that because you are an IB for multiple brokers, it creates a conflict of interest.
You may have noticed the Scam Investigation Committee did mention your case:








So your thread could not be used directly towards the trader's count case. But because other people were having similar issues (and were able to follow the FPA rules), there is an active court case against FPA:

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/comm...vote-on-continue-fx-results-under-vote.59225/

You may vote if you want to.

That will be enough.
the only thing that matters is that we will be able to vote if this company is scam one or not.
it does not matter if my case caused it or not.
 
Dear Valued Client,

We are apologies for delay reply, As we have have gone through your case, We have found that trading was did by your side through EA with VPN services ,we have seen you your trading history its similar to current trading. if you need we can send some more detail to you and your trading history with other accounts too.

Thank you
Support team
 
Dear Valued Client,

We are apologies for delay reply, As we have have gone through your case, We have found that trading was did by your side through EA with VPN services ,we have seen you your trading history its similar to current trading. if you need we can send some more detail to you and your trading history with other accounts too.

Thank you
Support team
Finally you replied after 2 months
All of my orders placed manually and I already shared the capture screen of my history that proves it.
I can even share my investor password here so everyone can see all of my orders placed manually
by the way even if I used EA , what is the problem with it ?
you claimed that your are Pure ECN Broker so what is the difference if I used EA or not?
Expert advisors are one of the the options that clients are allowed to use , but I knew that your company will say something like this , so when I opened my account , I asked my manager to disable my expert advisor trading option to prevent any miss understanding.
 
Finally you replied after 2 months
All of my orders placed manually and I already shared the capture screen of my history that proves it.
I can even share my investor password here so everyone can see all of my orders placed manually
by the way even if I used EA , what is the problem with it ?
you claimed that your are Pure ECN Broker so what is the difference if I used EA or not?
Expert advisors are one of the the options that clients are allowed to use , but I knew that your company will say something like this , so when I opened my account , I asked my manager to disable my expert advisor trading option to prevent any miss understanding.
Dear Fahime/Pouya,

We have your other account trading history, which we were managed for other traders, as we have discussed with our LP and he denied to accept this orders as it was triggered with manipulated EA, We have seen your history it was completely trading by EA only, and we have found your track record too, Still company paid you 5 times of your capital. We don't accept this EA for any more.


Thank you
Support team
 
Back
Top