• Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.

    Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.

    Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"

    Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"

    Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"

    Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
    Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.

    More info coming soon.

Discuss ForexAutomatorPro.com

General discussions of a financial company
Hi, Does anybody have settings for this robot. Default for pro is tp 5 sl 100 and settings for pro advanced id 5tp and 225sl? What settings are FPA using in their demo?:confused:



The FPA performance test of Forex Automator Pro does not have the current losing trade of EUR/USD that started at 1725 ET 27th July. Surely this bot should have matching trades across the board. I am now beginning to think this is an elaborate SCAM and I think the claims made are very far fetched.
 
FPA different results

FPA are running a demo test on Forex Automator Pro. I am running the same robot and at 1725ET yesterday my bot opened a SELL trade on EUR/USD. FPA does not show this trade but shows a BUY trade at 0249 this morning on the EUR/USD that subsequently won. The FPA trade did not happen on my account........HOW CAN THIS BE??? is it a scam???:confused:
 
most of automated trading is not profitable longterm. proof is the enumeration <a href=http://www.online-broker-vergleiche.de>www.online-broker-vergleiche.de</a> with many examples.
 
Last edited:
cause they have little average win but the potential lose is huge. for depots the enumeration <a href=http://www.broker-tabelle.de>Kostenloses Depot Vergleich</a> is very informative
 
Last edited:
Hey, EA's don't kill people, people kill people.

Er, I meant to say EA's don't destroy accounts, over-leveraging destroys accounts.

; - )
 
The FPA performance test of Forex Automator Pro does not have the current losing trade of EUR/USD that started at 1725 ET 27th July. Surely this bot should have matching trades across the board. I am now beginning to think this is an elaborate SCAM and I think the claims made are very far fetched.

All performance tests run by the FPA use default settings. If there are any deviations from default settings, that is noted on the test page. If the EA is run by the developers and not by the EA, that is noted on the test page.

Results can vary based on broker selection, demo vs. live trading, and connection speed between your platform and the broker. I would expect 2 different tests to be similar. I would not start a conspiracy theory based on a single trade not executing on one test.

If this was some sort of conspiracy, the reviews would all be 5 stars. They aren't. The current rating is 2.5 stars. If this was some sort of conspiracy, the rate of return would be a lot higher than 1 percent per week. Currently, it is 0.92% per week. If the open trade from August 9th closes, it will be lower.
 
50 Tp?

How can they be running default settings when all there profits are above 50 pip? And how can the ea have a 0.0 drawdown on a 100sl 50tp setup? I've set up the ea's with 50tp just to see if a similar result takes place.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top