• Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.

    Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.

    Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"

    Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"

    Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"

    Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
    Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.

    More info coming soon.

Problem FinTelegram is a huge (very clever) SCAM.

I am having an issue with a company
And regarding the claim that there is no joint ownership between EFRI Boehm Sixt etc
Fintelegram states that it is owned and operated by Cyber Intelligence Services LLC
View attachment 69073
By searching for further information about the CyberIntelligence Network, the associated website (source: www.cytelnet.com) states that:
CyberIntelligence Services PLC is the operator of the crowdsourced cyberintelligence(www.cytelnet.com)
View attachment 69075

The information on CyberIntelligence Services PLC shown under the UK Registry (https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12552465) allow us to note that:

1. Mr Boehm and Mr Dobias are the directors
2. Mr Boehm is Person with Significant Control



An Austrian company, CyTel42 Group AG, is linked (refer to the page bottom).
View attachment 69074

The now defunct www.efri.fund website – directly accessible via cytelnet.com – also stated that the Austrian entity CyTel42 Group AG was established the EFRI FUND (www.efri.fund) to provide Fund Recovery and operate a Whistleblower Program under which they reward contributing people with their C42 Token(https://efri.fund/the-glass-full-of-nota-bene).Furthermore, it states that the “EFRI consists of the two synergistically elements EFRI FUND and the EFRI NGO: the Efri FUND is operated by EFRI Asset Management Ltd” […] and “The EFRI Fund, a subsidiary of CyberIntelligence Services PLC”)

and, surprise surprise...

As per the UK Registry of companies website (https://find-and-update.company-inf...any/11544691/persons-with-significant-control) EFRI Asset Management Ltd is owned by CyberIntelligence and managed by Mr. Boehm.
EFRI is a not for profit organization registered in Vienna .. legally it can not be owned by someone... the EFRI Fund which belongs to the companies of Fintelegram is providing funding for somelegal cases like any other litigation funder as a third party.. no secret can be explained easily.
 
And regarding the claim that there is no joint ownership between EFRI Boehm Sixt etc
Fintelegram states that it is owned and operated by Cyber Intelligence Services LLC
View attachment 69073
By searching for further information about the CyberIntelligence Network, the associated website (source: www.cytelnet.com) states that:
CyberIntelligence Services PLC is the operator of the crowdsourced cyberintelligence(www.cytelnet.com)
View attachment 69075

The information on CyberIntelligence Services PLC shown under the UK Registry (https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12552465) allow us to note that:

1. Mr Boehm and Mr Dobias are the directors
2. Mr Boehm is Person with Significant Control



An Austrian company, CyTel42 Group AG, is linked (refer to the page bottom).
View attachment 69074

The now defunct www.efri.fund website – directly accessible via cytelnet.com – also stated that the Austrian entity CyTel42 Group AG was established the EFRI FUND (www.efri.fund) to provide Fund Recovery and operate a Whistleblower Program under which they reward contributing people with their C42 Token(https://efri.fund/the-glass-full-of-nota-bene).Furthermore, it states that the “EFRI consists of the two synergistically elements EFRI FUND and the EFRI NGO: the Efri FUND is operated by EFRI Asset Management Ltd” […] and “The EFRI Fund, a subsidiary of CyberIntelligence Services PLC”)

and, surprise surprise...

As per the UK Registry of companies website (https://find-and-update.company-inf...any/11544691/persons-with-significant-control) EFRI Asset Management Ltd is owned by CyberIntelligence and managed by Mr. Boehm.
EFRI NGO, the organization representing more than 1.000 victims is a legal entity registered in Vienna Austria and there is no legal relationship between Cyberintelligence or Cytel42 and EFRI, the NGO.. so what is here the story?
 
Frist of all EFRI requests a membership fee of € 75,- from some of the victims (the biggest part of the victims has never paid anything). Where did you get the number USD 6.500 from? Is it on the website or how to you know or pretend to know, Just send some proof. I do not know about such a claim, but I am not Fintelegram.
So you are not Fintelegram but you keep posting in defense of Fintelegram. Quite interesting.
EFRI is an NGO that has no legal owners but by coincidence “EFRI consists of the two synergistically elements EFRI FUND and the EFRI NGO: the Efri FUND is operated by EFRI Asset Management Ltd” and EFRI Asset Management Ltd is owned by CyberIntelligence and managed by Mr. Boehm.
The same CyberIntelligence that owns Fintelegram...
It seems to me you are not telling the truth.
 
So you are not Fintelegram but you keep posting in defense of Fintelegram. Quite interesting.
EFRI is an NGO that has no legal owners but by coincidence “EFRI consists of the two synergistically elements EFRI FUND and the EFRI NGO: the Efri FUND is operated by EFRI Asset Management Ltd” and EFRI Asset Management Ltd is owned by CyberIntelligence and managed by Mr. Boehm.
The same CyberIntelligence that owns Fintelegram...
It seems to me you are not telling the truth.
But what is the point of your claims here? Even if all stated is correct, do you claim Fintelegram and (or) EFRI are scams or you simply show that they are connected and may charge some fees?

Just by reading some of fintelegram reports on some scams, one can conclude they display accurately and in details. It would be very hard to pin a scam label to a website that exposed so much till this day, one would need actual proof. You might say the same for FPA, for that matter, but unless backed by rock solid evidence, it's just another pathetic attempt to discredit others.

So pls elaborate -what are we discussing here?
 
But what is the point of your claims here? Even if all stated is correct, do you claim Fintelegram and (or) EFRI are scams or you simply show that they are connected and may charge some fees?

Just by reading some of fintelegram reports on some scams, one can conclude they display accurately and in details. It would be very hard to pin a scam label to a website that exposed so much till this day, one would need actual proof. You might say the same for FPA, for that matter, but unless backed by rock solid evidence, it's just another pathetic attempt to discredit others.

So pls elaborate -what are we discussing here?
We are discussing the transparency of a site that claims to expose scams but at the same time is happy to remove scam warnings provided the scammer pays a hefty fee
We are discussing the integrity and honesty of an operator that claims to expose scammers and in doing so uses questionable marketing tactics pretending for example that FCA and other regulators are taking cue from the Fintelegram posts to ban fraudulent operators
We are discussing a potential scam in the making when these people are launching ‘recovery funds’ managed by anonymous (almost) untraceable entities and or launching their own ‘token’ to raise funds
We are discussing the fact that denying the obvious is not exactly an attestation of integrity and honesty which is the bare minimum you would expect from somebody claiming they are after dishonest and shady operators.
We are discussing a scam busting operation that is owned and managed by fraudsters and convicts!
Their ‘scam reports’ are very often ad hominem attacks against specific operators with the only purpose of charging the ‘whitelisting fee’. Why would you need a whitelisting fee if you are the investigator and therefore you should very well know who are the good guys and which are the bad ones?
This looks exactly like the setup of the Ripoff Report website and this is what I am trying to expose here
 
Just by reading some of fintelegram reports on some scams, one can conclude they display accurately and in details. It would be very hard to pin a scam label to a website that exposed so much till this day, one would need actual proof.
Are you aware that Ilan Tzorya, who was identified one of the masterminds behind the binary option fraud by the Austrian authorities, owned Fintelegram and Werner Böhm confirmed this to The Times of Israel? If you want hard proof of that you can just look at the UK companies register.

Sources:
FINTELEGRAM INVESTORS PROTECTION LTD Company number 09736430
Austrian authorities allege ex-IDF intel officer ‘mastermind’ behind €200m scam
Press release by Austrian Federal Criminal Police Office

According to a recent article the Austrian authorities allegeded that Ilan Tzorya, the guy who owned Fintelegram, allegedly defrauded 4,500 Austrians alone.

One month ago, on July 14, an indictment was filed in Vienna against Tzorya for fraud and money laundering, after allegedly defrauding 4,500 victims in Austria alone for about EUR 10 million (close to $12 million). Authorities in Europe are continuing to investigate the affair, arresting and filing indictments against members of the network.

Source:
The Forex Fraud: A wolf or a scapegoat?

I do not know about such a claim, but I am not Fintelegram.

According to your own Twitter profile you are a writer for Fintelegram and Werner Böhm told the German Bitcoinblog you are the Certified Public Accountant of Fintelegram. Can you please clarify your relationship with Fintelegram?

Sources:
Elfriede Sixt on Twitter
Die Bad Bank für Scam-Tokens (Bitcoinblog)
 

Maybe a smear story or no ?

Just this, probably their worst adventure YLINE FREISPRUCH…… means “ NOT GUILTY easy to catch, same outcome for the accountant Lady

https://kurier.at/politik/inland/14...-ich-durch-freispruch-nicht-zurueck/400755396

anyway here you may find the missing articles with all their HEROS names involved, pretty unfair stuff

https://web.archive.org/web/20200721182335/https://fintelegram.com/



https://fintelegram.com/regulated-i...ted-with-pumats-and-vast-scam-broker-network/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201028111003/https://fintelegram.com/

What happened………well, in short time we will see what will happen in some other truly nasty criminal EU Court :p
 
Its still not clear why would any affiliation btw Fintelegram and Efri be regarded as 'scam'?

If you have actual proof of blackmail and payment against taking off sensitive articles, publish it. Otherwise its just bunch of wordpress websites where anyone can say anything they like... Let"s see some evidence instead of lengthy thread correspondence with no actual information.
 
Back
Top