Nano4x stolen deposit money client!!!

[indrafx.trader]

VERY IMPORTANT!!!! WARNING!!!
nano4x STOLE my deposit money
nano4x is FRAUD... STOLE MONEY DEPOSIT ALL CLIENT

Please check my account statement
account : 715388
investor password : ptYYehPed7

i am deposit 1000$..
i has start trading.. any profit and any loss. but status my balance still same.

i want withdrawal my money deposit.. BUT NANO4X NOT PAY MY DEPOSIT... i trading not profit and not lost. i just want back money my deposit.. because i very needed money. but NANO4X NOT PAY MY MONEY.

first register nano4x just need document ID COUNTRY.. i has upload and status my account VERIFIED.. FULL APPROVE.
andthan i deposit 1000$.

but now i want withdrawal my deposit.. nano4x looking for new reasons :
- ID COUNTRY not good quality ( i has sent again)
- DRIVER LICENCE ( i has sent again )
- Bank Statement ( I has sent again )
- ID photo ( I has sent again )

but until now nano4x still not pay my deposit..

I HOPE ALL PERSON DONT DEPOSIT IN THIS BROKER!!!

I HOPE FSC REGULATION STOP THIS BROKER.. BECAUSE THIS BROKER STOLE MONEY CLIENT

I HOPE DOMAIN PROVIDER BANNED WEBSITE NANO4X SOON..

 

[Pharaoh]

Time to start complaining to any and all regulators. Don't forget to leave some nice, shiny 1 star reviews.

 

[along]

Any update on this issue, I just check on your account and the money is still there and u still have 2 open positions buy and sell on this account. did you manage to get your money back or your just cancel withdrawal and start trading again ? please update....

 

[fxfrench]

It's a good idea to avoid Panama registered companies. There is no regulation there. If you look at the "license" on their webpage it clearly says that all they are licensed to do is to collect payments and write invoices.

 

[RP1]

Any update on this issue, I just check on your account and the money is still there and u still have 2 open positions buy and sell on this account. did you manage to get your money back or your just cancel withdrawal and start trading again ? please update....

I see that too .
It does look like the broker removed your bonus + 20 % ?? which is not good.
Also it looks like your way over leveraging the account . not that this should be a reason why your bonus should be removed , just an observation.

 

[Lee Chwan]

There is no problem with this client, but because of ML Policy (client and few other account under check) Nano4x asked him to provide due diligence, and this story lasted already 2 month, because client still didn't send docs.

Dear FxOpen Representative. Regarding your company, traders already read on Mau FSC site, and I don't think that it's good idea to talk in thread of another company in such way. Your NZD reg., not quite different from Panama. Btw if you really read license on site, I think you could find point on the last page of translated document.

Regarding, bonus - 20% is rule pf bonus. You can find it here (point 4): Nano4x | Crediting

 

[Pharaoh]

Lee Chwan,

You seem to have a lot of information about this client. Do you work for Nano4x? If so, where were you when this went to a vote:

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/fore...ty-case-2012-042-sanito-vs-nano4x-com-en.html

I see Nano4x has its own warning from Mauritius here:

http://www.fscmauritius.org/media/67580/nano4x_alert.pdf

 

[fxfrench]

There is no problem with this client, but because of ML Policy (client and few other account under check) Nano4x asked him to provide due diligence, and this story lasted already 2 month, because client still didn't send docs.

Dear FxOpen Representative. Regarding your company, traders already read on Mau FSC site, and I don't think that it's good idea to talk in thread of another company in such way. Your NZD reg., not quite different from Panama. Btw if you really read license on site, I think you could find point on the last page of translated document.

Regarding, bonus - 20% is rule pf bonus. You can find it here (point 4): Nano4x | Crediting

Hello Lee

Firstly, this is not your thread.

Second, I agree that NZ registration is not as heavily regulated as it could be, but at least New Zealand Government has the Financial Dispute Resolution scheme where a client who is unable to resolve a dispute with the company can have an ombudsman step in to resolve it. Something Panama does not have.

I would be interested to see how you handle this query since your company is marked on FPA already.

 

[Lee Chwan]

Lee Chwan,

You seem to have a lot of information about this client. Do you work for Nano4x? If so, where were you when this went to a vote:

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/fore...ty-case-2012-042-sanito-vs-nano4x-com-en.html

Yes. Im from security department of Nano4x. All comments sent to client few months ago, regarding this case. Hard to say why he didn't publish it, coz now it looks like he using your forum as a tool for blackmail.

I see Nano4x has its own warning from Mauritius here:

http://www.fscmauritius.org/media/67580/nano4x_alert.pdf

Yep. And now we trying to remove it from fsc, coz we also moved to another regulator. A lot of work for Legal. Heh...

PS: Regarding case with Sanito, just few more words:
1. We never paid rebates for own trading more than 3 USD
2. We always trying to solve problems without public discussion, but... if someone trying to blackmail us we just asking to read agreement more carefull.

PSS: 2 fxfrench. Yes, you right. Btw, can you please clarify me... If your company declared bankrupt, how much (max) each client will have?

 

[Pharaoh]

According to the FSC, Nano 4x isn't moving from FSC to another regulator. According to the FSC, Nano4x never was licensed by the FSC.

"The FSC informs the public that Nano4x Limited is not and has not, at any time, been regulated by the FSC."

Can you please clarify Nano4x's view of whether or not it ever held an FSC license?

Further, it's sad that Nano4x ignored an invitation to participate in the discussion. That sort of thing tends to lead to guilty verdicts.

As long as you are throwing out a bankruptcy question to FxOpen, care to answer the same question?