Looks like some of the old gang is back!
I can't wait to see that book. I definitely vote for "Why Your Trading Sucks" as the title.
Heh Pharaoh good to virtually see you again too!
I was hoping for some more votes but thanks for yours which is weighty indeed.
Here is a long overdue example of some of the improvements
to STAR which I mentioned.
STAR is a reversal system with entries early in a new trend on
a prime retracement of the early pullbacks of an exhausted trend.
This gives low drawdown and risk is therefore minimized and
price moving away fairly quickly from the entry is what every
trader likes. Using your equity on the retracement side of a
reversal is better because you know where your stops will be
and you don't have to watch the reversal argument between
the bulls and bears.
We can use this in both directions though.
There was an H4 setup on the uptrend in AUD/JPY that had
already shown the traits fulfilled so at a certain pullback depth
we will read the signal. Last evening this did pullback to the
threshold of the criteria.
That pullback (down) also became a setup of its own on M5
and when reading the signal it came up Continuation.
Now at some point I had to go to sleep but our members
in the Eurozone and South Africa discussed a new pullback
to the downtrend M5 setup as an even faster uptrend setup
on M1. Now we
are talking fast because the new speed was
.202 on M1 so this changes our tools Fibbo family of indis
to an effective speed of 12.12 seconds.
This is now done as a global change all at once and by making
the speed multiplier .202 it was the slowest speed in which
the traitset would remain valid to criteria.
This is done using a tool called a 52s traitset tool which is
our bread and butter because markets are predominently
in corrective formations most of the time. When they do
come out of shell-shock jitters and give followthrough it
is obvious and we have another tool for that.
The tool and traitset for corrections is a simpler one and
built for more frequent reversals. Here is the latest tool
showing the traits for the fast M1 setup:
In the middle of that uptrend is a trait which is a main
regulator for speed matching with our Fibbo Family of
indicators and the behavior displayed as a result of price
action gives a FLIP of the indis. We call that trait a FLIP.
You may only have one flip in a valid traitset. Those orange
and black arrows show that the slowest indi has flipped and
are now accurate to the full Metatrader internal precision of
8 places. Our speed multiplier is a 3 place setting.
Then after that flip in the middle there is another trait and
that is a cut which is when the thin gold crosses the fat red.
All the traits are collected in a sequence and everything has
a very basic type of criteria like those.
At the high on that setup tool's chart the traitset is complete
and matches all criteria. It's pretty basic.
What has happened however is not basic at all. At least not
in last-bar TA-land. That traitset being complete was a way
to show exhaustion but at the speed of the market. Not at my
whim of what timeframe, TA setup and my special sauce s
ettings that I always like (none of which means anything to
the market which changes speed to get its job done).
Obviously that is a fast move. Is your setup fast or slow?
You cannot tell me. So you cannot compare it to the data.
Yeah, Technical Analysis is Data Analysis. Know any data
analysts with 95% fail rates? Employed ones I mean?
No that's because it's bad math to allow unknown variables
into equations. Seriously do you know to 3 places if your
technical (data) setup is matched to the move's speed?
Do you know what the speed controls are in your analysis?
I guarantee that your favorite setup or your EA has already
declared its "speed of analysis" and I can prove it. Whether
it is 1.000 or not if you only choose a timeframe that is how
you are using it and it won't match up well with a .202 speed
market movement.
STAR matches the speed first and only then performs an analysis.
That is the only true way to analyze the data in a meaningful way.
The kicker: Every move chooses a new speed.
Now about the analysis. Since you have a potential reversal you
want to know its speed and take the analysis in a way that will
balance the old trend's speed with the new move's speed.
That information is only in one place... the market itself. You have
to get it there.
After the traitset is complete and a pullback happens we evaluate
it to get that information out of the market at that exact location
because as you may imagine with changing speeds there is not
any rigid one-size-fits-all technique that is any good.
We will use a tool built with a full set of two Fibbo Families and
look for one of the oldest things, an MA cross. The periods of the
indis of the 2 sets in each Fibbo Family are arranged as pairs.
There is an EMA set and an SMA set on this tool. The fastest in
each set is Plum and the slowest in each set is Gold. What we
will do is find the nearest color matched pair to the pullback end.
Here is the pullback evaluation on the setup and there are of
course some hard fixed criteria we apply so it is all objective.
That little boxed red up-arrow was added to show where the
pullback's end or extreme was located.
(Some of the fast EMA's hide at a virtual 12 second speed but we
know the cross takes place in order and can tell Red is the nearest
cross here. The faster ones cross first, then slower ones etc.).
With the info from the market that Red crossed we call
up our signal tool. It is the X-factor tool that has the
settings for Red built-in. This is a Continuation signal
but we may pursue alternate trades with good risk/reward
using the faster X-factors which also crossed within a set
criteria.
Trying the next faster, the Magenta did give the go ahead
(by criteria) for an alternate trade if it would trigger in the
correct way. That did happen on the next faster X-factor
which was the Aqua. Here is that triggered signal:
The lime and purple arrows are accurate to 8 places and
show that criteria has been met for the alternate trade.
The actual risk was 2.6 pips plus spread. The actual
drawdown was 1.6 pips. So far still running at over
85 pips. Here is the resulting move. Do you have the
pips in your pocket and the way to gage the speed of
this move? (As I said I was fast asleep but I do have
the tools to do it all again up and down).
The book will go into the problems with TA in more depth
but some people won't care - they just want to know if
there is a solution. Speed matching is the only solution
because of speed changes. STAR is a solution.
So I wanted to let you know a bit about the way it works
because it works and some of the new improvements.
The standard STAR implementation would not have
identified this setup and given a nice way to rejoin the
existing downtrend on the M5 setup (which also uses
3 place speed multiplier for its traitset).
Cheers,
Cyclon