Scam Alerts is part of the FPA Traders Court. Claims between individual traders where no funds are involved never were and never will be part of the FPA Traders Court process. The court is intended to assist traders and companies to resolve issues and to expose cases of scam involving forex trading and forex products. You should read this before attempting to create your own interpretations...
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/new-traders-court.58022/
More details of how the current version of the FPA Traders Court are here...
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/forums/fpa-traders-court-faq-and-instructions.147/
We also want you and others to be aware that Review Moderator logins block the advertisements. This is done to keep borderline cases of approve/don't approve decisions from being influenced by whether or not a company advertises. Advertising does not prevent a company from getting bad reviews or from being asked to answer questions about issues presented by its clients.
You and other FPA members are permitted to engage in spirited debate, but any such debate must be kept civil.
Your claim against EagleFX is completely unsupported for the following reasons...
1. You have made no indication of having a trading account wth EagleFX or being owed any money by them.
2. Whether EagleFX's postal address in a hotel or not does not have any bearing on how EagleFX treats its clients. Early in the history of the FPA, the entire website along with 2 other businesses were run from a coffee table in the founder's apartment. The people who complained about this the loudest worked for some brokers who didn't want potential clients to know about how they had been scamming customers. The FPA is still here. Most brokers that have earned an FPA Scam Label are long gone. Most FPA employees now use desks, but there is no company rule against working from coffee tables.
3. Last week AsstModerator clearly showed that EagleFX is in a different building than the hotel. If EagleFX later moves it's company postal address into that hotel or into a restaurant somewhere, the FPA will still only care about how EagleFX treats its clients.
4. Screenshots of your arguments in other forums are irrelevant to your claims.
5. "A broker might steal client money" is not proof that a broker will steal client money. Every company and every person in the world who handles someone else's money might steal the money. Some do. Most don't.
There is also another requirement for those filing complaints in Scam Alerts. Requests for evidence and important questions about the issue cannot be ignored if the person complaining expects the complaint to be taken seriously or to remain open. This is covered both in question #9 here...
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/traders-court-faq-other-questions.13636/
and in Rule 3 of the Resolved Issues rules here...
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/resolved-issues-rules.35224/
Twice last week AsstModerator asked you about what evidence it would take for you to consider any broker not to be a scam. So far, you haven't written a direct answer. We will repeat his questions for you...
Do you have a standard for evidence a company isn't actively scamming clients? If no evidence is enough, what possible response could EagleFX or any company give you that would make you certain that no scam is happening? Should I just save us all some time and mark every company in the reviews as a scam? If no evidence is enough, what possible response could EagleFX or any company give you that would make you certain that no scam is happening? Should I just save us all some time and mark every company in the reviews as a scam?
You still haven't set a standard for what address, country, and regulator you would find acceptable. Should I add a note to all broker review pages saying "WARNING: FPA Member baddog4x says this is probably a scam and is ready to TYPE IN ALL CAPS to prove it!"?
Please present a clear answer in this thread sometime within the next 48 hours.