Hello, I have copied the latest reply from DCFXbroker below. BTW I live in Slovakia, Bratislava where they have scammed so many people. I can put together around 100 people from my region who have been scammed. Everybody gets the same stupid message regarding their liquidity provider. I received an information that they can't disclose the name of LP because they have signed contract which includes this info as classified and if they would disclose the name of LP, they would harm the contract conditions... Well and so what? I don't believe it. Probably we will need to jump in cars and travel to Budapest and find the people standing behind this scam. Millions of dollars have been stolen and responsible persons have to pay for it.
MyDCFxbroker
Different Choice FBC Inc.
Dear Customers,
I wish to inform you, as my Client, that, as has been indicated in our informative letters communicated by our customer relations staff and through our mailing system, collating data between our company and the liquidity provider related to the trading is currently ongoing and the trades intended for review by the liquidity provider are being checked.
In practice this means that the staff of the broker and the liquidity provider are jointly examining the trades of all clients, comparing data through continuous consultations, as the liquidity provider will only consent to the payment of the recalled amounts provided all items have been reviewed.
Irrespective of this, the operation of the system is stable, smooth and continuous.
In order to protect clients, the broker may not create a situation in which there is a risk of losing the client’s capital and earnings achieved that are retained by the liquidity provider, and thus the broker is obliged to cooperate during the review at his own expense and may not make compromises causing losses.
Furthermore, we wish to inform you that the broker is currently searching for lawful means and possibilities for another alternative solution for the unexpected event that the closure of the current consultations with the liquidity provider becomes unacceptably prolonged. In this context debiting the payment in proportionate instalments of the capital invested by the client effecting the recall to the broker’s own assets may be considered. However, a solution to this in compliance with the business code and the statutes needs to be examined, and in certain cases, should the amendment of the statutes become necessary, obtaining the owners’ consent and authorisation during an extraordinarily summoned general meeting is indispensable.
The liquidity provider strictly inspects the breach of confidentiality and thus we are unable to provide more detailed information because in extreme cases the liquidity provider may, on the grounds of breach of confidentiality, cancel the contract and refuse payment, thus causing considerable losses to both our clients and our company.
Bearing this in mind, we will nevertheless endeavour to provide information about the current situation in the future.
Thank you for your understanding!
With best regards,
DCFXBroker Legal department
MyDCFxbroker
Different Choice FBC Inc.
Dear Customers,
I wish to inform you, as my Client, that, as has been indicated in our informative letters communicated by our customer relations staff and through our mailing system, collating data between our company and the liquidity provider related to the trading is currently ongoing and the trades intended for review by the liquidity provider are being checked.
In practice this means that the staff of the broker and the liquidity provider are jointly examining the trades of all clients, comparing data through continuous consultations, as the liquidity provider will only consent to the payment of the recalled amounts provided all items have been reviewed.
Irrespective of this, the operation of the system is stable, smooth and continuous.
In order to protect clients, the broker may not create a situation in which there is a risk of losing the client’s capital and earnings achieved that are retained by the liquidity provider, and thus the broker is obliged to cooperate during the review at his own expense and may not make compromises causing losses.
Furthermore, we wish to inform you that the broker is currently searching for lawful means and possibilities for another alternative solution for the unexpected event that the closure of the current consultations with the liquidity provider becomes unacceptably prolonged. In this context debiting the payment in proportionate instalments of the capital invested by the client effecting the recall to the broker’s own assets may be considered. However, a solution to this in compliance with the business code and the statutes needs to be examined, and in certain cases, should the amendment of the statutes become necessary, obtaining the owners’ consent and authorisation during an extraordinarily summoned general meeting is indispensable.
The liquidity provider strictly inspects the breach of confidentiality and thus we are unable to provide more detailed information because in extreme cases the liquidity provider may, on the grounds of breach of confidentiality, cancel the contract and refuse payment, thus causing considerable losses to both our clients and our company.
Bearing this in mind, we will nevertheless endeavour to provide information about the current situation in the future.
Thank you for your understanding!
With best regards,
DCFXBroker Legal department
