I was the IB of Broco, but early of June 2009, Broco suddenly stopped my IB contract when I was asking my comission. I'm accused of doing fraud to them because I spare my comission to my client. Here are the nonsense :
Early of April, my rebate wasn't paid also. At that time, the amount was about 4000 USD. The IB department was saying that the minimum clients requirement was not met. Then I contacted my account manager whose contact detail is written on my control panel at Broco's User Area. Then, I was given the contact of someone, lets call her Mrs. X, because she was the specialist for this matter. I contacted her, and then I explained to her that I spare a part of my comission to my client in order to make him trading at Broco. So the comission was really important to me, and if it is not paid, I would be in trouble. She said she was understand and than a few hours latter she contacted me, saying there was good news, I could get my comission. Well thank you for the help, and my rebate was paid. NO warning, NO explanation about rules that forbid me to spare my comission, and the most important think, they knew I spare my comission with my client.
Early of May, I was aksing about the rebate for April, and they paid to me about 6000 USD, and again here, NO warning about any fault here, and they KNEW I spare my comission.
On June, my IB contract was terminated, and I asked my client to count on his trading, well the number of comission should be 17K USD. Well, here is clear that they didn't want to pay, because they said NOTHING previously. Just if they said that on April, than I should knew that it is forbidden by the rule. When I asked to the IB department, why Mrs. X didn't say about that rule at all on April, the answer was very unsatisfying, that time (on April) Mrs. X was a trainee, her word shouldn't be taken into consideration. How come a company made a decission and you may not trust their decission? How could a company mistaken a trainee as a specialist? Why didn't them remind me if I made mistake, but paying my comission on April and May instead (and they had known the fact that I'm sparing my comission with my client)? This is unreasonable and I think they just didn't want to pay, so they found any ways to escape from their duty to pay my comission.
Thats the story how Broco rip me, and everyone should be careful with this broker.
For addition, here is the agreement point that they used as a reason to terminate my contract.
I didn't get any advantage here, since I didn't receive anything for my mutual cause. Instead, I should spare my comission that I should enjoy by myself. I would be happy to get all the 4K, 6K, or even the 17K by myself than to spare it with anyone else. The statement isn't stating that I shouldn't give part of my comission at all.
Early of April, my rebate wasn't paid also. At that time, the amount was about 4000 USD. The IB department was saying that the minimum clients requirement was not met. Then I contacted my account manager whose contact detail is written on my control panel at Broco's User Area. Then, I was given the contact of someone, lets call her Mrs. X, because she was the specialist for this matter. I contacted her, and then I explained to her that I spare a part of my comission to my client in order to make him trading at Broco. So the comission was really important to me, and if it is not paid, I would be in trouble. She said she was understand and than a few hours latter she contacted me, saying there was good news, I could get my comission. Well thank you for the help, and my rebate was paid. NO warning, NO explanation about rules that forbid me to spare my comission, and the most important think, they knew I spare my comission with my client.
Early of May, I was aksing about the rebate for April, and they paid to me about 6000 USD, and again here, NO warning about any fault here, and they KNEW I spare my comission.
On June, my IB contract was terminated, and I asked my client to count on his trading, well the number of comission should be 17K USD. Well, here is clear that they didn't want to pay, because they said NOTHING previously. Just if they said that on April, than I should knew that it is forbidden by the rule. When I asked to the IB department, why Mrs. X didn't say about that rule at all on April, the answer was very unsatisfying, that time (on April) Mrs. X was a trainee, her word shouldn't be taken into consideration. How come a company made a decission and you may not trust their decission? How could a company mistaken a trainee as a specialist? Why didn't them remind me if I made mistake, but paying my comission on April and May instead (and they had known the fact that I'm sparing my comission with my client)? This is unreasonable and I think they just didn't want to pay, so they found any ways to escape from their duty to pay my comission.
Thats the story how Broco rip me, and everyone should be careful with this broker.
For addition, here is the agreement point that they used as a reason to terminate my contract.
2.15. Partner does not have a right to conduct any calculations with Clients (with or without cash, in
national or foreign currency) including receiving money, securities or other property from Clients
I didn't get any advantage here, since I didn't receive anything for my mutual cause. Instead, I should spare my comission that I should enjoy by myself. I would be happy to get all the 4K, 6K, or even the 17K by myself than to spare it with anyone else. The statement isn't stating that I shouldn't give part of my comission at all.