butterfly addon
thanks Sive for the precise analysis!
- as you illustrated, the most critical number in the pattern is the
1.27 XA leg -> resulted about at 1,3090 or
1.618 XA leg -> resulted at 1,2980
you said, if CD is faster than AB, then the price tendency is greater than 1.27 of XA leg and further characteristics confirm this expansion level at 1,2960 - 1,2980:
- AB expansion should be between 0.382 and 0.886; in that case it was over 0.886 and nearly like the XA expansion;
- the butterfly must include the AB=CD pattern and frequently, the CD part is 1.27 or 1.618 of the AB leg -> resulted to about 1,2960 or 1,2850;
- the XA calculation is complemented at an extreme BC projection of 2.00, 2.24 or 2.618 -> this leads to 1,30, 1,2960 or 1,2890
would you agree or do you use only the expansion of the XA leg?
all facts together should form the butterfly and at the end of CD leg there is the entry for the long signal;
if we don't find any signal at the level 1,2960, and it's probably in this week market, the butterfly fails and the market should rapidly go down;
would you agree too?
a second question:
you mentioned a nice W&R by the way in the video:
could you explain the W&R pattern from friday at 1,3360?
Jo DiNapoli is speaking from a market which is in consolidation above or under a D-level; on friday there was no consolidation;
there was a strong upmove against 1,3360; further he explained, in a short time frame the stops were cleared out like domino stones
and a price thrust is resulting; this was the upmoving bar at the height at this day and the price raised down in the next bar;
could you give us your insight of this phenomenon please?
thanks Sive!
I wish you merry christmas and nice relaxing holiday! we all hope to hear from you as soon as possible in 2011!
Erich