FinTelegram is a huge (very clever) SCAM.

Scam Reporters

Sergeant
Messages
205
I'm surprised how surprised people are that people like Ms. Elfriede Sixt are scammers.

These recovery websites are all scams. They claim to be able to do things only law enforcement can do to regulated brokers. There is very little recourse on offshore brokers besides chargebacks, scam reports, etc. That's the risk we take if you want the big leverage or deposit bonuses.

Her website clearly doesn't recovery any money for anyone and just posts articles with people's Facebook photos and corporate details to try to look clever.

Then she charges €100 x 1000 people that's €100,000 a year and she makes good money.

The scam keeps going. I find it particularity sad when people who already lost money give their money to someone like her after already losing so much. Shame on her. :(
Hmm... Putting in line others who do 'recoveries' and this EFRI shows you have not actually explored EFRI website in details. Should you have done that, you would have learned that a scam operated by Gal Barak was actually brought down because of Fintelegram and EFRI consistent reporting, triggering police actions accross different countries. Like it or not, its a fact. That alone is good enough for credibility. And why wouldn't they market it?
 

kingsman

Corporal
Messages
192
There is no difference between Elfriede Sixt and the other recovery rooms EXCEPT she runs a fake "news" site that gets information from public corporate directories and has a much more organized site than the recovery room scams.

Besides that, she has an equally abysmal success rate of recovering ANY client funds.
The arrogance posting people's names (such as her own clients) or the investors of a licensed payment processor (that probably have zero to do with the day to day operations) is highly unethical. And I have to agree she should be banned here for being another recovery room scammer.
 

Scam Reporters

Sergeant
Messages
205
There is no difference between Elfriede Sixt and the other recovery rooms EXCEPT she runs a fake "news" site that gets information from public corporate directories and has a much more organized site than the recovery room scams.

Besides that, she has an equally abysmal success rate of recovering ANY client funds.
The arrogance posting people's names (such as her own clients) or the investors of a licensed payment processor (that probably have zero to do with the day to day operations) is highly unethical. And I have to agree she should be banned here for being another recovery room scammer.
Dissagree. The news published on many actual scams turns to be correct. As for recovery success rate, it is probably true - no recoveries...yet. But what when it happens?
PSP investors unaware of illicit business practice-this is a joke. It does not exist and we all know it very well. Hence, they are 'guilty' for facilitating or not acting against 'day to day' business malpractice.
On the other hand, naming clients is really wrong step and a clear breach of confidentiality. However, the name mentioned apparently refers to an ex client?
Any case, this is something that should not be done. But that's the most of our critics regarding Efri.
It would not be fair to oppose what they do, because the information they release serve the public interest. And again, if anyone has any proof, why not post here?
 

EFRIteam

Company Representative
Messages
25
There is no difference between Elfriede Sixt and the other recovery rooms EXCEPT she runs a fake "news" site that gets information from public corporate directories and has a much more organized site than the recovery room scams.

Besides that, she has an equally abysmal success rate of recovering ANY client funds.
The arrogance posting people's names (such as her own clients) or the investors of a licensed payment processor (that probably have zero to do with the day to day operations) is highly unethical. And I have to agree she should be banned here for being another recovery room scammer.
Your approach regarding "innocent" investors of Payment Service Providers is very interesting and complete nonsense. Regarding our success rate, actually we are quite satisfied: A lot of people have a lot of troubles: B2G, Wirecard, Payvision, BrucBondy.... and some other European legal and illegal payment service providers are also under criminal proceedings due to our work. Refunds for the more than 800 victims represented by us are just a question of time. Relax.
We do not press the fraudsters, we help the prosecutors to identify them and to arrest them like GAL BARAK or Uwe Lenhoff and some others (just wait -).

As I already told this Patrick Lim never was our client, he just wanted to get information from us to put pressure on the fraudsters for his own benefit and at the expense of all the other victims registered with us. We definitely dislike such behaviour.
 

oscarra

2nd Lieutenant
Messages
1,178
Hmm... Putting in line others who do 'recoveries' and this EFRI shows you have not actually explored EFRI website in details. Should you have done that, you would have learned that a scam operated by Gal Barak was actually brought down because of Fintelegram and EFRI consistent reporting, triggering police actions accross different countries. Like it or not, its a fact. That alone is good enough for credibility. And why wouldn't they market it?
They don’t want to read it’s more easy to spill hate and insult some 900 victims

https://fintelegram.com/vienna-cybercrime-trial-baraks-attorney-blames-victims-for-their-losses/

at this point it’s quite clear Barak is facing his victims, let’s see how it goes, if Vienna applies EU Laws it should be no problem to indict all parties involved…..in solidum “Amen” …otherwise it will turn into a pissing contest, needing some higher EU court

Normally no need for any court financing ?
 

EFRIteam

Company Representative
Messages
25
It will not be that easy!
... regarding the court proceedings... the Austrian court has still to understand the importance of the ruling on GAL Barak for the fight against cybercrime in Europe. We work on that already.
... regarding refund for victims: GAL BARAK pretends to have no assets at all, according to him he earned € 2.000 - € 3.000 on a monthly basis during the past years.
Some minor money amounts got frozen, but we know from the criminal files that GAL BARAK and his "friends in crime" haven stole more than 250 million Euros from mainly European victims.
 

Scam Reporters

Sergeant
Messages
205
It will not be that easy!
... regarding the court proceedings... the Austrian court has still to understand the importance of the ruling on GAL Barak for the fight against cybercrime in Europe. We work on that already.
... regarding refund for victims: GAL BARAK pretends to have no assets at all, according to him he earned € 2.000 - € 3.000 on a monthly basis during the past years.
Some minor money amounts got frozen, but we know from the criminal files that GAL BARAK and his "friends in crime" haven stole more than 250 million Euros from mainly European victims.
But surely the stolen money left trace? So eventually it should be found?
 

EFRIteam

Company Representative
Messages
25
B
But surely the stolen money left trace? So eventually it should be found?
About 74% of the stolen money went to service providers of the fraudsters like advertising, technology provider (Tradologic, PandaTS), payment service providers, boiler rooms, the remaining part went to the beneficial owners to accounts in Hongkong, British Virgin Islands, Isle of Man.. this 70/30 or 60/40 proportion applies to most of these kind of frauds, we learned by now,
 
Top