nicolebobbin
Private
- Messages
- 76
Did FPA has problem last few days ? I couldn't access until now
thanks for ur analysis, i must confess u ve made me a better trader, in this week's pivot i got 1.3819 which is different 4rm urs 1.3803, pls i want to know wher i went wrong, i used ur calculation of classical pivot which i believe u use also
high= 1.3913
close= 1.3893
low= 1.3652
pls help me
Did FPA has problem last few days ? I couldn't access until now
Hourly trend is bullish, here you can see both butterflies, that we’ve discussed during the week. Also you can see that first butterfly, was a bit extended beyond 1.618 extension before it has started to work properly. The same could happen with the second one – 1.618 target stands at 1.3917, while 1.27 AB-CD extension at 1.3963. So, market can reach that level before any signs of retracement will appear. But I would like to show you not that butterflies, but 1.618 3-Drive “Sell” pattern that is forming on 4-hour chart, especially if we will take into consideration 4-hour MACD action – double divergence. I guess you can find it by yourself now. That’s an excellent educational example by the way, of harmonic patterns compounding. In our FPA School you will find whole part dedicated to this topic (but probably it will be released a bit later).
Still will it work or not – I will not dare to suggest, but no doubt we have to keep an eye on it...
What possible reason would you have for ever widening your stop?
Sorry for the tone of this message, but widening stops just because your trade is going against you is ludicrous.
Hey sive..Im quoting this part of the analysis that comes after the "hourly" sub-title in the first page. This is last week comments , I guess you forgot to erase it...I'm just pointing it out, it could mess up some peoples thoughts. Actual hourly analysis is developed after the hourly chart.
hi sive
i got a quick question regarding risk. in light of the actions of the SNB in early SEPT when they pegged the EURCHF at 1.20, and recent rumours that they will do it again, raising the peg to 1.40, and the swiss unions and commercial interests clamoring for the SNB to do it, what is the risk in assuming that the bottom now stands at 1.20 and therefore enter long because 1.20 will hold?
is this almost a slam dunk, almost risk free? that is to say, if there is no intervention, (EURCHF currently at 1.2273) the market could drop all the way to 1.20 (worst case), but since this is peg, then it would bounce up again and surely regain those 273 pips for at least a break even trade.
is this a fair assumption? or am i totally ignorant of how pegs work?
if i am right, then this could be 1700 pips in a matter of minutes if the SNB intervenes again!
what am i missing here?
as always, thanks.
yes yes indeed. god knows i've been caught with my pants down too many times doing just this... BUT sometimes intuition comes to the rescue and you suddenly realize you misplaced the damn stop and mr market is just being late with his christmas gift. ;-)
thanks for the tip rashidin. unfortunately i don't have the dinapoli indicators. MBTrading doesn't provide them on their proprietary platform or MT4. and if i may ask--and let me extend the question to all who read sive's analysis here--coud you guys tell me a little about your experience with your broker? broker name? how is the execution? requotes?
thanks.