You admitted you couldn't follow Pharaoh's math, so he kindly came back to give you a simpler example to show that the same prices and proportional sizes would result in a much larger loss than profits. Just because someone claims he can do physics equations does not automatically grant that person the ability to calculate why your AUDUSD trades should have had exactly the same profit and loss that you reported.
The 3 specific items I need to see from you are in
Bold Italic Red below. Please do not waste any more time by posting repeats of earlier messages.
Failure to provide the requested evidence or any further attacks on the FPA or on members trying to help you will cause me to invoke Item 9 in this thread...
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/traders-court-faq-other-questions.13636/
Your case has already qualified for Abandoned twice. I expect nothing but clear and concise answers to my questions or this is over.
Since you keep posting the same image files over and over again, let me address each one...
my-14-07-2018-email-png - You complaint about minimum lot size on WTI gas and say you are owed over $400 because you couldn't trade smaller. This is not a forex issue. If a broker does not allow small enough trades in something, a degree in physics will not help you. You also claim that there is any international law requiring forex companies to set smaller lot sizes on non-forex instruments.
If you dispute this, please provide a link to the law and quote the relevant sections. If you cannot provide the link to your claimed law as well as quote of the specific text relevant to your claim, then there is nothing in that image which qualifies the legal claim for any further attention.
your-repl-17-07-2018-png - A simple statement that ICMarkets is declining to pay you because they did nothing wrong by allowing you to place trades.
ur-reply-24-07-2018-png - A simple explanation of one of the causes of a "Trade Disabled" message. Being unable to open a trade is not a valid reason for a scam complaint, so I do not understand why you keep attaching this message.
ur-reply-review-2-png and
ur-reply-review-2-png - Repeats ICMarkets' position that they are not obligated to give you the smaller lot sizes on commodities. This does nothing to support any claim of scam.
u-accepect-ur-fault-25-07-2018-png - this is nothing but another copy of the
ur-reply-24-07-2018-png message about what "Trade Disabled" means. I apologize for not noticing this sooner. Previosly, I just cycled through the images and did not realize that one was only a duplicate.
If there's another message on July 25th, please make a new screenshot of it and post it.
A claim of being cheated on trades requires real numbers to back it up.
Please present a list of disputed trades on currency pairs with their trade ID, opening/closing prices, trade volume, swap (if any), profit/loss per broker statement, and the P/L you believe you deserve. Then show your calculations of how you derived your claimed P/L for each of those trades.
This 3 items in red above are the evidence needed if you want your case to go forward. You may make a separate post for each if you want to. Any of these items you do not respond to within your next 3 posts will be dropped from your complaint. If all 3 are dropped, I expect a clear, concise, and mathematically verifiable numbers for whatever else you might be claiming.