Gold GOLD PRO WEEKLY, December 13 - 17, 2021

Sive Morten

Special Consultant to the FPA
Messages
18,664
Fundamentals

Gold market stands focus on the same driving factors as any other market - Fed policy, the common economical background for the economy. Yesterday we've taken in-depth analysis on coming Fed meeting, and come to conclusion that we could get hawkish surprises from the Fed because of few reasons. First is, rate change expectations were discounted once Omicron has appeared, but are not priced-in back yet at full degree. Second - economy shows the good pace, job market slowly but stubbornly recovers, but inflation start to make negative impact on Democrats' and Biden rating as real wages are stagnating. We suggest that Fed could make rhetoric a bit more hawkish while it should not change the promised steps of tapering acceleration. If nothing from the mentioned events will happen - it improves bullish sentiment around the gold.

Market overview

Fed policymakers look likely to accelerate the wind-down of their asset purchases when they meet later this month as they respond to a tightening labour market and move to open the door to earlier rate hikes than they had projected. A measure of U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly rose in November, hitting a record high as businesses boosted hiring, but there was little sign that supply constraints were easing and prices remained high.

"A faster taper announcement looks like a certainty if data on the Omicron variant this week and next confirms it is milder in severity. So gold could come under sustained pressure and potentially trade as low as $1,720 next week," said Jeffrey Halley, senior market analyst at OANDA.

"Gold should slowly tread lower on the prospect of tighter policy and if CPI comes out hotter than expected, that's only going to lead to a more aggressive Fed being priced in," said IG Markets analyst Kyle Rodda. But, "real yields are still negative and so investors could look to diversify from bonds into some other store of value, which could support gold," Rodda said, cautioning that this would depend on how hawkish the Fed is next week and how the Omicron variant affects inflation expectations.

The average prices of gold, silver and platinum next year will be almost the same as in 2021, while the average price of palladium will fall, consultants Metals Focus said.

With markets more optimistic as worries over the Omicron coronavirus variant ease, gold has joined the bandwagon in part because of its inverted correlation with the dollar, Ricardo Evangelista, senior analyst at ActivTrades, said. But gold's upside may be limited and it was not likely to move above the $1,810 level, especially with the narrative shifting back to central banks' tightening policy, which was likely to drive further U.S. dollar gains, Evangelista added.

Gold slipped on Thursday as the dollar firmed and data showed a big drop in U.S. jobless claims ahead of an inflation report that could influence the Federal Reserve's monetary strategy. The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits dropped to the lowest in over 52 years.

"Gold could see fresh bids if markets become fearful once more about pandemic-related developments or a ramp-up in geopolitical tensions between major economies," said Han Tan, chief market analyst at Exinity.

Apart from lingering uncertainties over the Omicron coronavirus variant, focus was also on tensions over Russia and its stance on Ukraine, the diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Olympics by some Western nations and U.S. sanctions on Iran.

"Gold is defending the lower end of the $1,770-$1,810 range because investors are worried about a hawkish Fed pivot, but there's still enough uncertainty around the Omicron variant, which could delay rate hiking cycles, to support gold," said Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management. Markets are already pricing in three rate hikes for 2022, so the bar for a hawkish surprise is high and that's why longer-term gold investors aren't so worried about the taper, though it could weigh on gold in the near-term."

"The focus is on the inflation data and if we will get a strong print then the dollar should appreciate, bond yields should rise, maybe stock markets could rise as well, but the gold price will probably be down in response to it," said Commerzbank analyst Daniel Briesemann. The November CPI figure could increase pressure on the Fed to end tapering sooner and start raising rates, Briesemann added.

"The gold price falling for three consecutive weeks likely points to the market putting more weight on the spectre of the Fed's impending rate hike than the negative impact of rising inflation at this moment," said Vincent Tie, sales manager at dealer Silver Bullion in Singapore. However, we continue to see gold demand from value-driven investors who are dollar-cost averaging their holdings with the price dipping under $1,800," Tie said.

Top Asian hubs saw healthy demand for physical gold this week as domestic prices retreated into the year-end, although volatility in rates deterred retail buyers and jewellers in India.

Gold gained on Friday as its safe-haven appeal was boosted by elevated U.S. consumer prices, which also cooled some bets for aggressive interest rate hikes since the jump in inflation was not as big as expected.

"The latest inflation report did not come in as hot as some were expecting and that should keep Federal Reserve rate hike expectations between two or three rate hikes in 2022," Edward Moya, senior market analyst at brokerage OANDA, said. Gold prices will embrace today's report as it likely pushes back that first Fed rate hike into the middle of next year."



Bullion also drew strength from a slip in the dollar, which increased its appeal for overseas buyers, and as U.S. Treasury yields fell after data showed U.S. consumer prices increased further in November, leading to the largest annual gain since 1982

Financial markets, which have struggled this year to decipher central bankers' policy signals, face their biggest challenge yet in December when in the space of 24 hours the Federal Reserve, ECB and Bank of England hold crucial meetings. These come at the end of a year that saw central banks generate frequent bouts of market turmoil, the most recent examples being the BoE's shock "no change" decision on Nov. 4, October's timid rate-hike pushback by the European Central Bank and the Reserve Bank of Australia's failure to defend its bond yield target.

First up on Dec. 15, the Fed's 1800 GMT statement may announce faster tapering of asset-purchases and could reveal its thinking on future rate rises. The next day, the BoE meets, having in November kept rates on hold -- at odds with market pricing. Less than an hour later, the European Central Bank could announce plans for two key bond-buying programmes; implications could be big for highly indebted states like Italy.

Monetary policy messaging, by its very nature, is an inexact business. But unexpectedly sticky inflation, supply-chain threats to economic recovery and COVID's constant background menace now make the outcomes especially hard to model.

"Whether it's Madame Lagarde or Andrew Bailey or Jay Powell, the current circumstances are creating almost a perfect storm of challenge to central bank communication," said Carl Tannenbaum, Northern Trust chief economist who worked at the Fed's risk section during the 2008 financial crisis.

ECB chief Christine Lagarde too was criticized after her half-hearted rejection of rate rises priced for 2022 in late October boosted the euro and hurt bonds. But the moves reversed the following week when she forcefully rebutted rate hikes.

The Fed's Jerome Powell seems to have garnered top marks, not least for his willingness to admit he didn't have all the answers. But even his calm wavered recently; days after telling lawmakers Omicron could imperil economic recovery, he suggested it may be time to stop seeing inflation as transitory. The dollar which had weakened, shot straight up again.

But Timothy Graf, State Street's head of EMEA macro strategy, praised Powell for his "honesty and forthrightness", drawing parallels with the candour of ex-ECB chief Mario Draghi, credited with steering the euro zone from its 2011-2012 crisis.

"The Fed is making a course correction from what was perceived earlier in the year, rightly or wrongly, as having a somewhat relaxed approach to the inflation question," Graf said.

The U.S. Federal Reserve's experiment with running a "hot" economy has edged into historically uncharted territory, with an unemployment rate never reached without associated central bank rate increases and now levels of inflation that in the past also prompted a policy response. The Consumer Price Index for November posted the biggest annual increase in 39 years, data on Friday showed, amid signs that price pressures are broadening and likely leading policymakers at their meeting next week to significantly raise inflation projections that have been running behind actual outcomes.

1639298587642.png


That may prompt a policy shift, with officials accelerating plans to end their bondbuying and, many analysts expect, signaling that rate increases may begin sooner than anticipated.



The unemployment rate is also flashing red, at least by past Fed standards. The 4.2% rate reached in November has only been hit or exceeded about 20% of the time since the late 1940s, covering four periods of low joblessness, including the late 2010s, with the Fed raising rates during each.

1639298620033.png


The central bank in 2020 concluded that inflation was now less of a risk and pledged to try to milk more jobs and a lower unemployment rate out of an economy it felt had changed in fundamental ways since the high inflation scares of the 1980s - a conclusion that's now being tested in real time.

"They are behind the curve and I have thought so for some time," said Glenn Hubbard, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George Bush and now a Columbia University economics professor. The Fed's new approach hoped to drive an array of labor market indicators like the participation rate back to pre-pandemic levels, but Hubbard said "running the economy hot...is a risky bet" if it aims to offset structural economic forces like demographics that aren't responsive, at least not quickly, to central bank policy.

1639298690017.png


On the surface wages are rising as employers struggle to fill open jobs in a pandemic era where the unemployed are reluctant to rejoin jobs for health or other reasons, and those who are in jobs have gained leverage to job-hop for higher pay. Yet once adjusted for inflation wages have fallen for nine of the past 11 months, with growth in "real" wages moving little beyond the pre-pandemic trend.

That fact has hit home in the Oval Office, with President Joe Biden's Democratic Party facing a potentially difficult mid-term election map next year and his approval ratings taking a hit in part because of rising prices. Biden in a statement Friday pitched the issue forward, arguing that key prices for gas and autos were already drifting lower, and said steps taken or proposed by his administration would help ease inflation's pace.

"Price increases continue to squeeze family budgets," Biden said. "We are making progress on pandemic-related challenges to our supply chain which make it more expensive to get goods on shelves, and I expect more progress on that in the weeks ahead."

The strong CPI data for November were expected, but still "only solidify the case for a faster tapering of asset purchases" when the Fed meets next week, said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics. "More important will be Chair Powell's message on tightening of policy going forward."

Inflation is one aspect of that, with global supply chains trying to catch up with unprecedented consumer demand in the United States that was driven by another historic anomaly - personal incomes that rose, due to large government support programs, despite massive unemployment.

But the Fed's response is similarly unprecedented. The November unemployment rate is now close to the 4% level that policymakers consider sustainable over the long run. It is also edging towards what Fed officials have effectively penciled in as the lower limit on the unemployment rate of about 3.5%.

Since policymakers began publishing quarterly economic projections in 2012 the median unemployment rate for any given year-end has slipped below 3.5% only once, and that just barely, at 3.45%. In data since January 1948, the unemployment rate has only fallen below 3.5% in 41 of 887 months - during a jobs boom of the early 1950s, again in the late 1960s, and never since.

1639298914457.png


The central bank is counting on finding a sweet spot this time that has been elusive, a "soft landing" that brings inflation down from higher-than-desired levels while allowing the labor market to continue to heal.

Spells of unemployment this low have not, so far, tended to end so well.

1639298932157.png


For the record, the consensus forecasts for 2022 sees higher equities, a higher dollar and higher bond yields. It's just never as simple as that.
1639299186393.png


1639299217841.png



The US Long-term strategy progress

Last time we've talked about long term US strategy to keep economy struggle with China. Now we could see the first fruits of this long-term trade war. We've built the theory that China growth is slowing down by intended slowing of cargo shipping across the ocean as sea ways mostly controlled by US and UK. And second - delaying of sending empty containers back, i.e. slowing the containers' turnover.

Much like the coronavirus pandemic, and the economic disruption that it has caused, a global shipping crisis looks set to go on delaying goods traffic and fuelling inflation well into 2023. The cost of shipping a 40-foot container (FEU) unit has eased some 15% from record highs above $11,000 touched in September, according to the Freightos FBX index. But before the pandemic, the same container cost just $1,300.

With 90% of the world's merchandise shipped by sea, it risks exacerbating global inflation that is already proving more troublesome than anticipated.



Peter Sand, chief analyst at the freight rate benchmarking platform Xeneta, does not expect container shipping costs to normalise before 2023.

"This means the higher cost of logistics is not a transitory phenomenon," Sand said. "For inflation, that means trouble ... The element of shipping, in overall prices, small as it may be, is much bigger than ever before, and it could be a permanent lift to prices going forward."

In early November, 11% of the world's loaded container volume was being held up in logjams, down from August peaks but well above the pre-pandemic 7%, Berenberg analysts estimate.

In late October at Los Angeles/Long Beach, one of the world's biggest container ports, ships were taking twice as long to turn around as before the pandemic, RBC Capital Markets estimates. Although the worst may be past, RBC analyst Michael Tran does not see freight prices returning to pre-pandemic levels for another couple of years.

Even if plans to unload an extra 3,500 containers each week are implemented, the Los Angeles/Long Beach backlog is unlikely to clear before 2023, he said. "The softening in prices we saw at the end of September is a false dawn. What we see from a big-data perspective is that things are not getting materially better."

1639299582839.png


A United Nations report said last month that high freight rates were threatening the global recovery, suggesting they could boost global import prices by 11% and consumer prices by 1.5% between now and 2023.The impact also ripples out; a 10% rise in container freight rates cuts U.S. and European industrial production by more than 1%.

The report noted that cheaper goods will proportionally rise more in price than dearer ones, and that poor nations producing low-value-added items such as furniture and textiles will take the biggest hit to competitiveness.

The retail price of a low-end refrigerator will rise 24% compared with 6.5% for a costlier brand, Ben May, head of macro research at Oxford Economics said, adding: "Companies may just stop shipping very cheap fridges, as it just won't be worth it."

With the U.S. inventory-sales ratio near record lows, businesses will also need to restock. "This will support demand for goods through the first half of next year," Unicredit analysts said.

1639299792764.png


"These time bombs are riddled through large enterprises' supply chains and will present many problems for their customers who rely on their goods and services."

Real relief may come only when more vessels appear. Ship orders have risen significantly this year. But it takes three years to build and deliver one, and it will be 2024 before sizeable new tonnage hits the water, senior ING economist Rico Luman predicted.

Now let's take a look at effect on China economy...

China's exports growth lost steam in November, pressured by a strong yuan, weakening demand and higher costs, but imports unexpectedly accelerated as the country scrambled to restock depleted commodities like coal. Exports rose 22% year-on-year in November, customs data showed on Tuesday, slower than the 27.1% jump in the previous month but faster than the 19.0% expected in a Reuters poll. Imports climbed 31.7%, beating the 19.8% rise in October and well above the forecast 20.6% gain.

China's trade surplus
was $71.72 billion last month, narrower than the poll's forecast for $82.75 billion and the $84.54 billion surplus in October. The data comes a day after China's central bank announced a cut to the amount of cash that banks must hold in reserve, its second such move this year, to bolster slowing economic growth

The country has staged an impressive rebound from the pandemic but there are signs momentum is flagging. Power shortages, regulatory crackdowns on major industries and debt troubles in the property sector are weighing on China's recovery. Analysts expect more supportive policy measures in the coming months

A private sector survey showed factory activity fell in November, hit by higher prices and subdued demand although the government's official survey showed activity grew in the month. China's factory-gate inflation hit a 26-year high in October as coal prices soared during the power crunch.

"That said, the scope for a further rise in outbound shipments is limited – container throughput has levelled off in the past 12 months as ports have been operating close to capacity," said Julian Evans-Pritchard, senior China economist at Capital Economics, in a note.

So, US just needs to lead the situation to the vital point where the chain reaction of economy crush will be triggered. With the data that we have here - it could take 2-3 years more. It means that pandemic will not over till this moment and inflation hardly get meaningful relief. And take a look what is going on - the most smart ones gets the idea where all stuff is going to:

South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. is considering an investment of as much as $17 billion to build a chip-making factory in Arizona, Texas or New York, according to documents and people familiar with the company’s plans. Samsung is scouting two locations in and around Phoenix, two locations in and near Austin and a large industrial campus in western New York’s Genesee County, according to one of the people.

TSMC, Sony to invest $7 bln for new Japanese chip plant

Japan will allocate about 600 billion yen ($5.2 billion) from its fiscal 2021 supplementary budget to support advanced semiconductor manufacturers including the world's No. 1 contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), Nikkei reported on Tuesday. As part of the stimulus package, the Japanese government will invest about 400 billion yen in a new factory to be set up by TSMC in Kumamoto prefecture, southwest Japan, according to Nikkei. TSMC said earlier this month it would build a $7 billion chip plant in Japan with Sony Group Corp (6758.T), a move that was welcomed by the Japanese government.

Whether we're getting "Made in Japan" electronics again? And whether we really will get "Made in USA" Samsung goods? Are you kidding? What would you say about it three years ago? Slowly but stubbornly US hunts its own line. You will see - very soon other will follow to ship back production either in the US, Canada, UK, Japan, Australia, NZ or EU, at least. This is the next hit on China that comes very soon, once the new plants will be ready to not hurt overall production volumes.

To be continued...
 
COT Report

This week I wouldn't pay too much attention to the CFTC numbers, just because it reflects mostly speculative games. Short-term traders were heavily possessed for higher CPI numbers with big long positions on US Dollar. As CPI hasn't given as "7%-handle". They were reversed back. This time we see strong drop of open interest and closing of the long positions. It is more interesting what happens on next week after Fed press conference.

1639304033732.png



Conclusion
Today, guys, we not occasionally bring the long term US strategy results together with shorter-term driving factors. In fact the former are the reasons for the latter. And it is correct to start our discussion with the long-term factors. Everybody knows that US and GP are the strongest sea powers that control all sea shipping ways. This is exceptional geopolitical tool and advantage that they could and already use to dominate over the major economical rival - China. Chinese economy has understandable pain point and if US will press on them - they could start chain reaction of economical collapse that potentially should resolve the problem of the US dominating in global economy and keep the value of the US Dollar. This is, in fact, what they are doing now. And as we saw from the above - they are getting success on this way. So, why we're talking about it?
This lets us to set terms. Until US will reach its target, pandemic remains and inflation should keep going higher, as demand stands constant (or rising) while number of goods is contracting. Soon, you'll see the "Made in USA/Japan/UK/EU" goods and "made in China" goods by the same price. What would you buy? Right. This is powerful tool that resolves a lot of problems - putting down China, moves production back, decreases domestic consumption in general. All these stuff suggest that inflation is coming for the long-term. This is not the question of the Fed policy and they can't resolve this problem. This is due global production restructuring. But what does it mean that "inflation stands for the long term"?
As there is only one real driving factor for the gold, which is real interest rates - as longer Fed will keep rate low, as longer real interest rates remain negative of keep going lower into the negative. Which is all the better for the gold. Following this logic, we do not expect that gold should collapse within nearest 1-2 years. Although higher volatility comes on first Fed tightening steps. Later, in a longer perspective, if gradually US will start easing its "Chinese pressure" and Fed rate will come up with the inflation and real interest rate starts climbing - Gold should turn down. Supposedly by the US this should be boom of production in the US in high technologies sector and electro car/trucks production.

Technicals
Monthly

Despite the Friday volatility, price mostly remains at the same levels. For the whole week we were watching downside action to major 1760$ support area, which was a bit bumpy.

In short-term performance looks a bit poor, as market pulls back inside the flag consolidation and under YPP, showing upside spike. So, we can't totally exclude some downside continuation on lower time frames as well. At the same time, it doesn't break yet the monthly picture. The support line that makes shape of triangle here seems to be more important at current moment.

Speaking about upside target, we have very thrilling combination. Major COP is completed, but we also have all-time COP, when A point equals to ~ 40$ - fixed gold price to US dollar before the Bretton Wood. In this case all time COP agrees with YPR1 around 2165$. This is next nearest target on gold...

Once we've mentioned that overall price performance doesn't look truly bearish in long term. Market stands too close to the top, forming tight consolidation and has not reached even 3/8 major support. And potential appearing of pennant pattern just confirms this. This in turn, cares signs of bullish dynamic pressure, as market stands tight while MACD is going down...

gold_m_13_12_21.png


Weekly

Here is the only one major change since the last week - we've got the bullish grabber that we've suggested. I've checked the gold futures and there we have the grabber as well. It might be some hint on flat Fed statement when they provide tapering acceleration but no hawkish comments will sound. As tapering mostly is priced-in already, as 3 rate hikes next year, flat statement should provide support to the gold market. As this trading setup potentially cares significant risk, with no possibility to forecast of predict somehow possible outcome - you should decide on your participation in this trade. Technically it seems clear - just put the bet on the grabber with stops below it. But, the background remains tricky, as usual around Fed meetings.

gold_w_13_12_21.png


Daily

On daily time frame the tricks continue. Here, on retail broker CFD chart we've got the bearish grabber on Thu, while based on Futures chart we've got the bearish grabber on Friday. So, the tension and contradiction between weekly and daily signals remains. This also explains why we should think twice about entry timing and about entry, in general.
The grabber favors our initial trading plan, when price should hit 1755-1758 target area, which should provide more technical confidence for any bullish background. Since there will be 2 sessions till the Fed - market could complete both ways - hit the targets and then follow to weekly grabber, forming another one this week. That would be just perfect:
1639303589918.png


Intraday

4H keeps 3-Drive shape valid. Appearing another two side by side grabbers suggests that our concern is not in vain, as downside butterfly action could be triggered here:

gold_4h_13_12_21.png


That's being said, it is definitely big task to think on long entry and where it would be better to do it. With multiple bearish patterns on the back we would say that it is better to wait when they will either be completed or cancelled. Bearish trading here is possible, with the simple following of the grabbers that we have, while it cares the same risk of Fed statement uncertainty.
 
Greetings everybody,

The uncertainty on the gold market remains, as nobody wants to take risk at the eve of Fed meeting. Yesterday price has moved slightly higher, and although daily picture remains bearish - flag pattern after big sell-off, despite that MACD has turned bullish, price still was able to fluctuate around the grabber' top, suggesting that it could fail.

gold_d_14_12_21.png


US interest rates has dropped yesterday, but gold was not able to show the same scale of upside action.
Only slow creeping to upside. Our 3-Drive is still valid, that the top of the 2nd drive is vital point for it. If gold breaks above - the shape of 4H chart changes and we have to search for the new background. Meantime, for conservative traders we suggest to wait and follow with this scenario. If you still worry to miss the trade in a case of dovish Fed statement, you could consider, for instance, using Stop "Buy" order near the top that should be triggered in a moment of the upside breakout. If gold falls - your order just doesn't work.
gold_4h_14_12_21.png


Alternatively, on 1H chart price might be forming a kind of H&S shape, with the OP around 1800$. Second way to take position is to stick with this pattern.
gold_1h_14_12_21.png


But with the uncertainty around the Fed decision - it is impossible to say how good this pattern will be. That's being said - either wait or take significant risk.
 
Morning everybody,

So, recent reaction PPI numbers just confirms that gold indeed is a bit "watching down" market, showing stronger reaction on negative news. It suggests bearish sentiment, at least in the short-term.

gold_d_15_12_21.png


Currently we suggest that best way is just follow (and wait) to our major 4H scenario with 3-Drive pattern. Downside butterfly is not failed. So, to consider any chances for long entry - we have to wait for 1755-1758$ support area and completion of extensions around it:
gold_4h_15_12_21.png
 
Good morning,

So, reaction on Gold market was tricky as well with spikes in both direction, but, still - our short-term setup and suggestion of reaching 1755-1758$ area has been completed perfectly. So, patience is rewarded sometimes.

Now, on daily we have bullish grabber, up from major 5/8 support and price returns inside the flag consolidation. Although we see signs of just profit taking in this action - but it seems it has enough momentum to let market to climb a bit higher. Besides, grabber suggests higher action above the recent top here:
gold_d_16_12_21.png


So, 3-Drive starts perfect. It has the same minimum target as the daily grabber. If you've got the position with it - move stops to breakeven and watch the movie...
gold_4h_16_12_21.png


Those who would like to take the long position could consider two ways. First is to catch minor retracement right now, probably even not at 1H chart but at 5-15-min and aimed on 3-Drive target. Second - as here we could get H&S pattern, just watch when the right arm will be formed. Probably on the next week. We do not consider any short positions by far.
gold_1h_16_12_21.png
 
Good morning,

So, gold shows perfect action. Speaking on daily/weekly basis and if you haven't taken position with our 3-Drive 'Buy" pattern few days ago - here is 2nd chance is coming. It seems that we should get weekly grabber this time. Price is coming to 1815-1820$ resistance area. With the strong sell-off behind, the chances on 30-50% retracement seems significant. That's what we intend to watch for on the next week:
gold_d_17_12_21.png


On 4H chart as a target we use ultimate butterfly extension. 1.27 is passed, while 1.618 stands around 1818$ area, near the recent local top and daily overbought area:
gold_4h_17_12_21.png


Since overall upside action looks thrusty, scalp traders could consider any pullback, that might be a kind of B&B "Buy" setup. Most suitable is 1790 area. It is a bit wide K-support, but it has natural support as well:
gold_1h_17_12_21.png


Others who have long position obviously could keep it.
 
Back
Top