Gold GOLD PRO WEEKLY, February 07 - 11, 2022

Sive Morten

Special Consultant to the FPA
Messages
18,659
Fundamentals

For the gold market it was a choppy week as for all the others, but, at the same time, it was not as decisive as for the EUR currency. After going forward and back again gold ends the week above 1800$ area, despite deep drops through the period. Data that we've got have mixed effects. While bullish turn from ECB should make pressure on the dollar and correspondingly support the gold, rising inflation, real interest rates, and massive appreciation of major currencies due to hawkish central banks steps become a headwind for the gold.

Market overview

Gold prices edged up on Monday even as expectations for interest rate hikes by the U.S. Federal Reserve put non-yielding bullion on track for its worst monthly performance since September. The Fed plans to raise rates in March on the assumption the economy will largely steer clear of fallout from the Omicron coronavirus variant and keep growing at a healthy clip.

The dollar has risen against other currencies based on expectations of Fed rate hikes, while other central banks haven't really started to move yet, which has created a problem for gold, said Bob Haberkorn, senior market strategist at RJO Futures. The reality of five Fed rate hikes possibly this year has spooked the gold market a little bit, and gold is competing with bonds since it doesn't earn interest, Haberkorn added.

An employment report from ADP showed U.S. private payrolls unexpectedly fell in January, pressuring the dollar and Treasury yields. Bolstering bullion's appeal, U.S. President Joe Biden approved sending additional forces to eastern Europe over a Russian threat to invade Ukraine. Although gold is considered a hedge against higher inflation and geopolitical risks, interest rate hikes remain a potential headwind since that translates into a higher opportunity cost of holding non-yielding bullion.

Gold is still hovering above $1,800 and a lot of that has to do with Treasury yields having been "exhausted" and with the dollar still near today's lows after the private payrolls data, said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at brokerage OANDA. If gold can continue to stabilize above $1,800, some more investors will probably start to come back in, Moya added.

"Continued short covering and perceived bargain buying" are helping gold and silver prices, Jim Wyckoff, a senior analyst at Kitco Metals, said in a note. "A slumping U.S. dollar index and crude oil prices hitting seven-year highs this week are bullish outside market forces for the metals markets," Wyckoff added.

Gold prices steadied on Thursday, as a weaker dollar and risk-off sentiment in the equity markets helped counteract the pressure from a jump in U.S. Treasury yields. Benchmark 10-year note yields jumped to 1.838%, its highest in nearly a week after a hawkish rate hike by the Bank of England boosted investors' expectations towards similar moves by the U.S. central bank. Fed officials have signaled they will start raising interest rates next month to fight high inflation.

"Gold is once again being hit by the fact that central banks are gradually coming around to the idea that tightening is going to be warranted to get inflation under control," said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA. "It's clear the central bank is the latest to accept it underestimated the inflation problem and markets are now pricing in multiple hikes."

Gold prices edged higher in choppy trade on Friday as growing inflation worries helped cushion pressure from a firmer dollar and higher U.S. Treasury yields after a surprisingly upbeat U.S. jobs data. An unexpected jump in U.S. job growth in January fanned fears around inflation and weighed on risk sentiment among investors. Data showed U.S. nonfarm payrolls increased by 467,000 jobs last month.

"We continue to see inflationary pressures build in the economy. As a result, the expectation is the Federal Reserve will take measures to fight it," said David Meger, director of metals trading at High Ridge Futures. However, this creates the push-pull we're seeing in the gold market supported by those inflationary pressures."

Gold prices have retreated since scaling a 1-1/12 month high in late January after the Fed signaled an interest rate hike in March.

On the technical front, "the $1,800 level is key for gold and if gold can continue to hover around it, that would be very positive for bullion bulls," Edward Moya, senior market analyst at brokerage OANDA, wrote in a note.

Not the Fed only - massive Price hikes in the US

From Hershey to Clorox and Kleenex maker Kimberly-Clark, major consumer-products companies have announced plans to boost U.S. prices further or more broadly than previously proposed this year, signaling that the fastest inflation rate in a generation may not ebb soon.Product makers generally hold conversations with U.S. retailers at year-end about price hikes planned for the following year. But company executives disclosed during recent quarterly results that they are taking a more aggressive approach this year to protect margins.

Clorox late on Thursday said it plans to raise prices on 85% of its products by the end of June, up from a previously planned 70%, with some of the company's brands set for multiple rounds of price hikes.

CFO Kevin Jacobsen said its executives are "having conversations with retailers" about additional price increases that would go into effect during the next two quarters, beyond those previously disclosed in October. We stand prepared to take more pricing (action) if necessary," Jacobsen said. "We want to see how inflation will play out this fiscal year," which ends June 30, 2022.

Chocolate maker Hershey said it would raise prices further in the first half of 2022 in the United States on top of price increases that will go into effect in the first quarter ended March 31, 2022. Kimberly-Clark said last week it would undertake more price increases -- following four rounds of price hikes in 2021 -- as pulp, labor, and transportation costs continue to bite.

Pandemic-driven supply-and-demand imbalances have pushed up prices on everything from Big Macs to household staples, which caused the U.S. inflation rate in 2021 to climb at its fastest pace in nearly four decades. The comments from executives on post-earnings calls show that firms are grappling with higher costs on nuts and vegetable oils, surfactants, and plastics as global supply chain glitches linger. Transportation and labor costs are also up.

At Clorox, Jacobsen described an "extreme level of cost inflation." The bleach maker cut its full-year earnings forecast and said it expects its full-year gross margin to shrink by about 750 basis points (7,5%). I do think it's going to take several years for us to rebuild margin (to pre-pandemic levels)," Jacobsen said on a call with analysts.

Cadbury Chocolate and Oreo cookies maker Mondelez International last month disclosed that there could be "multiple pricing waves" this year to keep up with inflation. At Procter & Gamble executives said the company plans to raise prices on some of its personal healthcare products In mid-April.

Energy prices for millions of British households are set to soar from April after the energy regulator said on Thursday that it would raise its cap on the most widely used tariffs by 54% due to record global gas prices. The rise comes amid a cost of living crisis as inflation and food costs rise. Regulator Ofgem said it had no choice but to raise the cap, which covers around 22 million households, following record global gas prices last year.

To ease the impact, the government will now provide state-backed loans to energy providers to spread the higher costs over five years, worth 200 pounds to consumers from October. A 150-pound rebate on local taxes will also apply to around 80% of households in England.

Governments across Europe have spent tens of billions of euros trying to shield consumers from record energy prices, either removing taxes or supporting the neediest, after gas and power costs spiked when economies reopened from COVID-19 lockdowns

Supply bottlenecks and China performance

Meantime, strong U.S. demand for goods from Asia during the pandemic has boosted imports, clogging West Coast ports. Some ocean vessels have left the United States carrying empty containers after making deliveries, rather than waiting to fill ships with American goods for export.

Ships delivering cargo at ports in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, have also skipped Oakland, a major hub for agricultural exports, to return to Asia more quickly. Oakland's export volume in 2021 declined 8% from the previous year, the port said, hurting shipments of products like nuts, dairy and produce.

In the first nine months of 2021, shipping disruptions cost the U.S. dairy industry about $1.3 billion due to lost business and higher shipping and storage costs, said Jaime Castaneda, executive vice president of the U.S. Dairy Export Council and National Milk Producers Federation. Some importers canceled orders because of delays, forcing U.S. producers to resell their goods at a discount, Castaneda said.

Such delays contributed to a 57% surge in the company's supply-chain costs last year, Durkin said. Costs are expected to jump another 50% in 2022, with a third of the increase related to exports, he said.

The Chinese authorities have not taken advantage of the economic tailwinds of their strong, early recovery from the pandemic recession to rebalance their economy. China entered the pandemic recession first among the major economies and exited first, growing extremely rapidly in the second half of 2020. The easily achievable growth target for 2021 presented the ideal opportunity to shift the balance of its growth towards the consumer – but the opportunity was not taken, as downside risks to growth arising from rebalancing were judged to be too great. The consequence could be longer-term underperformance.

On the geopolitical side, US-Sino relations have not reverted to their pre-Trump status with the election of Biden. Our view was that there had been a sea-change in the stance of the US towards China ahead of the election of President Trump, on both sides of the political divide. In fact, if anything, the relationship has become more antagonistic.

1644140554727.png



China’s GDP growth slowed to just 4% on a year-on-year basis in the fourth quarter, affected by weakness in the real estate sector, power outages, and the government’s zero-tolerance response to fresh COVID-19 outbreaks. Purchasing managers’ surveys suggest that this softness in activity continued in January, despite recent policy easing by the authorities. The official NBS Manufacturing PMI fell to just 50.1 from 50.3 previously – only slightly above the 50 level that separates expansion from contraction. Its non-manufacturing counterpart declined to 51.1 from 52.7. The Caixin Manufacturing PMI also fell from 50.9 to 49.1 – its weakest since February 2020. Amid ongoing weakness in activity and with the all-important 20th National Party Congress occurring later this year, Fathom expects further policy easing. Nevertheless, the Chinese economy will face a number of major downside risks in 2022.

1644140672324.png


Data also shows no significant relief in shipping costs from China to the US and Europe:

1644141076021.png


The HARPEX (HARPER PETERSEN) Index reflects the worldwide price development on the charter market for container ships, stands at 2 year highs:

1644141226109.png


Last week we also have considered the NY Fed Global Supply Chains Pressures Index (GSCPI), which shows the level of global problems with goods delivery, using multiple indicators data. Based on the recent Dec 2021 data - it stands near all-time high as well:

1644141992099.png


Despite the good 2021 Chinese export numbers that we've considered last week, it seems that the US geopolitical strategy to hold China by creating artificial bottlenecks in supply chains is working and bringing some fruits. Simultaneously by making goods more expensive inside the US they reduce the demand for Chinese goods among the population.

A U.S. extension of tariffs on solar products distorts international trade and hinders the development of clean, low-emission energy, China's commerce ministry said on Saturday. President Joe Biden on Friday extended Trump-era tariffs on imported solar-energy equipment for four years, though he eased the terms to exclude bifacial panels that generate power on both sides, which are dominant among big U.S. projects. Donald Trump imposed tariffs on solar imports in 2018, using authority under section 201 of a 1974 trade law. The levies started at 30% and declined to 15%.

With the new China/Russia $117+ Bln agreements pack and Russia/China turning to Latin America and Argentina in particular, the pressure on China should exacerbate. Just a day before that V. Putin also met with Argentina's leader Alberto Fernandez. Argentina has a long-term conflict with Britain over Falklands, so this is not just about the economy but about geopolitics as well.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki warns that a "destabilizing conflict in Europe would impact China's interests all over the world," after the leaders of Russia and China meet in Beijing. (Feb. 4)

Finally, the London Metal Exchange (LME) index of base metals surged 38% higher last year as pandemic demand recovery met supply chain disruption. That, however, maybe for the super-charged rally, according to base metals analysts participating in Reuters' January poll. Median forecasts imply a retreat from current price levels over the course of 2022, the pull-back becoming more pronounced next year. Market balances are expected to shift from supply deficit towards surplus in 2023 as production recovers and demand cools, particularly in China.

Chinese factory activity shows signs of stalling, with both official and the Caixin purchasing managers indices slipping in January, the latter dropping to a 23-month low. The negative implications for metals consumption is the area of greatest concern for analysts and explain why many have turned more conservative in their price outlook. Capital Economics for example argues that "with Chinese demand unlikely to bounce back meaningfully this year, we continue to expect sharp falls in industrial metals prices by year-end". Chinese policymakers may open the stimulus taps to steady the economic boat, but the Evergrande saga is a warning that problems in the construction sector - a key driver of metals demand - may be as much structural as cyclical.

1644143872756.png



COT Report

Short-term data shows the deteriorating sentiment on the market. This week we see a collapse in the net long position of the gold and closing of more than 10% of total open interest. The bulk of closing stands for speculators while hedgers also have closed positions against potential gold rising. Still data has been released before inflationary NFP report and SPDR fund shows minor drop in storages by far:

1644143551748.png


1644143592884.png


In long term, looking back to 2020, the commodity macro-group of the six Lipper classifications saw steady weekly inflows at the start of the pandemic. Throughout 2020 M2 money supply grew astronomically, and investors rushed into these funds that primarily invest in commodity-linked derivatives or physicals. In 2020, $36.8 billion flooded into these funds.

Last year, however, was not so friendly for the macro-group as the six Lipper classifications witnessed a total of $9.0 billion in outflows. Lipper Commodities Precious Metals Funds saw the largest total outflows under the macro-group throughout the calendar year (-$11.4 billion). The tides may be turning, so far year to date the macro-group has attracted $3.7 billion and has only logged one weekly net outflow.

1644144737092.png


As a bottom line:

The short-term perspective doesn't look too inspiring for the gold market. Although further anticipation of hawkish policy from the ECB and BoE should keep some pressure on the USD, recent massive out of the asset and rising of the real interest rates suppose that ride could be bumpy and we could get wobbling market with wide swings. The important question is the chance for a 50 b.p. rate change in March. Currently, it is priced at 40-50%. With two more data releases ahead of the March meeting, investors closely will be watching for inflation data and basic economic statistics. This probably becomes the dominant factor for the nearest 2 months. Currently, we suggest that 0.5% rate change has not big chance to happen and Fed tries to compensate moderate hike pace with QT adoption. But if inflation accelerates more in Feb and March, the situation could change.
Long term picture looks moderately positive to the Gold. We think that the last bulls' word is not said yet. Whatever happens in the geopolitical sphere it always supports the gold price. And whoever starts taking the lead, Russia or US/NATO - it will be a loud and painful process for the economy, but the golden time for the precious metals. The question is only about the scale and the way of contradiction. Massive price hike for the population across the Globe changes the mentality of the people and it might be a chain reaction with demanding higher wage due to inflation rumors. Fed could lag behind the inflation pace that many economists already talk about. Besides, nobody knows currently how strong the recovery is. There are some fears that Fed tightening policy could start hurting economic recovery earlier than it is widely expected. So we have a moderately optimistic view of the gold market in the perspective of 2-5 years. Still, the moment for investing stands ahead, and gold could drop under the impact of short-term bearish factors first, before major recovery starts.
 
Technicals
Monthly

Despite bumpy ride on daily and lower time frames, longer-term ones are barely impacted by recent events. Price mostly is coiling around 1800 area and YPP that is positive, especially on a background of bearish fundamental factors, and how gold resists to them. It seems that investors right now can't agree with total gold capitulation and still see the place for gold in their portfolios.

Still, the nominal trend remains bearish and gold was not able to break the resistance of YPP that keeps the door open for a further price decrease.

Once we've mentioned already that overall price performance doesn't look truly bearish in long term. Market stands too close to the top, forming tight consolidation, and has not reached even 3/8 major support. And the potential appearance of the pennant pattern just confirms this. This, in turn, cares signs of bullish dynamic pressure, as the market stands tight while MACD is going down...

Although current price action suggests that gold could drop more, it is still far from monthly vital areas around 1680$ lows.

gold_m_07_02_22.png


Weekly

The retail broker's chart shows the bearish grabber this week, but it is not confirmed by CME futures prices. Anyway, we massive sell-off last week and a big jump in real and nominal interest rates, it is difficult to count on strong upside performance. Bearish reversal of the last week has not got its continuation yet, which could happen now. Currently, we have to be careful with any bullish position.
gold_w_07_02_22.png


Daily

Despite a strong upside bounce on Friday, the daily chart still has a bearish context with negative MACD and tight flag consolidation around the major 5/8 support area after the solid drop of the previous week. As we've mentioned on Friday, the only bullish context that we have is engulfing pattern on intraday charts and it has done well. On a daily chart we do not consider taking any new long positions by far:
gold_d_07_02_22.png


Intraday

In general, market performance here doesn't look very inspiring as it shows the signs of exhausting. Divergence stands in place and the most obvious area where gold could start dropping from is 1820-1825. Although it is multiple ways how it could get there. We have upside AB=CD, and minor (magenta) AB-CD from Friday's engulfing trading setup, but both have the same target. As an option, we could get 3-Drive instead with a slightly higher reversal point around 1823$ but anyway - whatever pattern you watch - it leads to the 1820-1825 area. And anyway we get greater scale "222" Sell. This is the setup to think about for the bears.
gold_1h_07_02_22.png
 
Copy Paste

Gold still searching for intraday resistance , now at interesting 1810-1830 zone, while 10 year yield breaks towards 2%.
 

Attachments

  • FK_N3FsXoAA-376.png
    FK_N3FsXoAA-376.png
    22 KB · Views: 10
  • FK_N3FfWYAIfi8w.png
    FK_N3FfWYAIfi8w.png
    24.3 KB · Views: 13
Greetings everybody,

so, minor upward action has happened and we're at the 1820-1825 resistance area. Despite that recently we've got some acceleration, it is too few to speak about bullish sentiment. There are three major points that keep me aside from taking a long position here by far.

The first is the cross-market situation. The dollar is oversold, while 10-year yields are rising, and this combination is a headwind for the gold. The second market stands at resistance, flirting with the MACDP line, which potentially could give us a bearish grabber today. And, finally third is - we're coming to CPI numbers on Thursday. With wage inflation jump in January, CPI also could bring surprise.

gold_d_08_02_22.png


Daily gold still keeps the flag shape and now it hits the major 5/8 Fib level. As our upside short-term extensions have been completed around 1820-1823 level, potentially we could get "222" Sell pattern:

gold_4h_08_02_22.png


Finally, our 3-Drive pattern is entering the last stage.
gold_1h_08_02_22.png


That's being said, everything a more or less but looks logical. The only riddle is when and how to take a position. In fact, we have two options. If you're a conservative trader - wait for a bearish reversal pattern around 3rd Drive and control appearing of the daily grabber.
Otherwise, you could try to sell with stops somewhere above the 1826 area, but as usual, reversal anticipation cares well-known risks.
 
Greetings everybody,

Speaking in two words on the gold market I would say it makes sense to wait a bit. First reason is both our patterns have not been formed. I mean daily bearish grabber and 1H 3-Drive as market has moved above 1825$ Fib resistance area. This definitely is a bullish sign.

At the same time, on daily chart it is possible recognize the shape of the H&S pattern and market comes to important vital 1830$ area of the arm's top, where it turns down or, alternatively aims on 1855$ top again. And this happens right at the eve of CPI release.
gold_d_09_02_22.png


On 4H chart we have potential XOP around 1837$ area and "222" Sell pattern, despite that CD leg is more extended:
gold_4h_09_02_22.png


Hourly chart gives another tighter XOP target around 1834. It is based on 4H big engulfing pattern.
gold_1h_09_02_22.png



Overall price shape is difficult to call as thrusting as well. Thus, the combination of targets around 1825-1835 area and H&S shape makes us to wait a bit with the long entry. For short position we also need the final detail - clear bearish reversal pattern, that we do not have yet.
 
Greetings everybody,

So, indeed, gold has crept slightly higher and come to vital 1835-1838 area. In general, it is difficult to call daily performance bearish, because we definitely see some activity and overextension compared to normal H&S shape. Besides, gold has broken the major 1825$ resistance as well.
Yes, we're coming to CPI and Fed minutes releases, but it might be some geopolitical inside as well, although nothing new in public media. Markets seem too quiet right now. Anyway, this 1840 point is very important to the gold. In a case of an upward breakout, the road to 1910 might be open. Otherwise, downside action also will be extended.

gold_d_10_02_22.png


On 4H chart market gradually and stubbornly moves to 1838 target. This type of action suggests that the breakout in any direction probably will be strong. This, in turn assumes using, or considering at least, of "Stop" entry orders instead of Limit ones. For long entry - Stop Buy above XOP, around 1840 maybe.
For short entry it is not as important. Here maybe, it makes sense to wait for the first reaction and then take position on retracement. Especially because current price action looks a bit strong:

gold_4h_10_02_22.png


On 1H chart our XOP is done as well and market is coilng around. So, trading the gold market right now will be inspiring but a lot of risk presents as well.
gold_1h_10_02_22.png
 
Greetings everybody,

So the record-high CPI numbers have pushed the gold market down. Today's Fed minutes publication could add more fuel to the fire if it has something bearish. Currently it is a bit early to talk about direct downside trend as gold is also sensitive to geopolitics that could smooth the effect of financial factors, but, with the performance 10-year yields and dollar index we suggest that gold should move slightly lower, but for how much?
gold_d_11_02_22.png


On 4H chart we have "222" pattern that suggests as minimum target 1818$ support. This is the minimum target and it is almost done. Meantime, dollar index forms bullish reversal bar, suggesting some further dollar appreciation. With yields above 2% now, it seems that at least deeper retracement here should happen. Next fib level stands around 1805$
gold_4h_11_02_22.png


On 1 H chart we have two tools for target estimation. First is the trend line support, which also stands around 1805$ and, around the top we have high wave pattern. Using its' length as the target calculation - it also point on 1805$ area. Thus, probably we could suggest that gold could slide slightly lower to the next major Fib support area:
gold_1h_11_02_22.png
 
COPY Paste

Stocks are coming sharply down on reports that Russia would attack Ukraine in the following week. We see crude oil breaking higher with gold, as yields come down, but interestingly, the USDX is not following. Is actually up. We think there can be a new shift in trends next week if Russia does nothing. Stocks would quickly stabilize then. Enjoy your weekend.
 

Attachments

  • photo_2022-02-12_02-16-09.jpg
    photo_2022-02-12_02-16-09.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 6
Back
Top