All the ip addresses I found in the broker journal belong to the same Malaysian ISP:
118.101.101.30
inetnum:******118.100.0.0*-*118.101.255.255
netname:******ADSLSTREAMYX
descr:********TELEKOM*MALAYSIA*BERHAD
175.141.180.10
inetnum:******175.136.0.0*-*175.143.255.255
netname:******ADSLSTREAMYX
descr:********CORE*IP*DEVELOPMENT,
descr:********TELEKOM*MALAYSIA*BERHAD
110.159.13.240
inetnum:******110.159.0.0*-*110.159.255.255
netname:******ADSLSTREAMYX
descr:********CORE*IP*DEVELOPMENT,
descr:********TELEKOM*MALAYSIA*BERHAD
Where is the broker server located? And where is your server located?
Added: the logs attached are just the application logs - there is no EA trading activity recorded in the MT4 application log.
Please attach expert logs. You can find them in [your Metatrader directory]\experts\logs
The best covering both normal trading day and the problematic day.
Thanks for your work on this Teodor Jackson.
This is the kind of evidence FPA needs to really make an informed decision. It is too easy to just sympathise with a complainant and brand the defendant "guilty" when all the evidence is not yet presented.
If the FPA Traders Court is to retain its credibility, then we have to think a lot harder than some of us have, about these difficult cases.
In this case, if the broker truly IS found to have manipulated the account, then civil and criminal charges need to be laid by the State Police or the FBI, or whoever can pursue it. There is no grey area in that case.
But there are cases where brokers may be innocent of the charges brought against them, and that is the true function of any court - to FIND the truth, and apply it.
If the broker is innocent, he needs to be a little more energetic in defending himself. If the complainant is trying to bring a false charge to cover some bad trades, then this also needs to be brought to light.
Your approach, Teodor Jackson is one that should bring up the truth of the matter.
Thank you for your clear thinking and guidance here.