1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

GUILTY Case# 2012-042 | sanito vs nano4x.com/en/

Discussion in 'Guilty Verdicts' started by sanito, May 3, 2012.

?

Based on the available evidence, do you believe that Nano4x.com is guilty?

Poll closed May 27, 2012.
  1. Guilty

    62 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Not Guilty

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Forexlaser

    Forexlaser Recruit

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    It Happens far too frequently, If we could energize efforts to prevent this sort of thing happening. Should brokers etc not declare there financial position or be subject to rating by establishment with authority. Unfortunately I know this will be difficult with so many clowns bad mouthing or intentionally being derogatory to competitors for there own selfish reasons. Keep up good work FPA
     
  2. onenikos

    onenikos Corporal

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    8
    Failure to at least answer immediately is reason enough to vote guilty, in addition to the subject matter.
     

Share This Page