GUILTY Case# 2018-158 | Javier vs AG-Markets.com

Based on the available evidence, do you believe that AG-Markets.com is Guilty?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 77 98.7%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 1 1.3%

  • Total voters
    78
  • Poll closed .
Dem Broker - sofern es überhaupt ein Broker ist - wird hier im besten Fall fehlende Offenlegung und Verletzung der Rechenschaftspflicht vorgeworfen. Allein dafür ist der Anbieter schuldig zu sprechen. Wahrscheinlich liegt hier aber wirklich Betrug vor. Die hätte der Anbieter durch eine Stellungnahme ausräumen können. Da dies nicht geschah, kann hier nur ein Urteil gefällt werden...schuldig.
 
Since every evudence are in a language I don't understand, presumably in Spanish I guess, and particularly some of the screenshots, it is hard for one to cast a vote .
 
In english:

The broker - if it is even a broker - is accused in the best case, missing disclosure and violation of accountability. Alone for that reason the broker is guilty. Probably there is really fraud here. The provider could have cleared out by a statement. Since this did not happen, only one judgment can be made here ... guilty.
 
Estafa clara! Ellos nunca responden un mail, ellos no respondieron aqui, donde ellos podrían haberse defendido de tantas acusaciones!
El 95% de los comentarios aqui son malas experiencias con AG Markets.
Culpables eatafadores
 
In english:

The broker - if it is even a broker - is accused in the best case, missing disclosure and violation of accountability. Alone for that reason the broker is guilty. Probably there is really fraud here. The provider could have cleared out by a statement. Since this did not happen, only one judgment can be made here ... guilty.
Well yes you are right. The broker could have put in their views.. a clarification at the least, by an official statement !
 
Para que sepan que no pueden estar robando dinero de la manera tan descarada como lo hacen AG Markets a gente latina de países pobres donde nos cuesta mucho lograr ahorrar algo de dinero para que en poco tiempo nos lo quiten.
 
This is typical fraud and scam behaviour by a so called broker. It is not hard to come to a conclusion no matter what language the case is written in, fraud is fraud. If you take the time to read other cases available here on the FPA website you will quickly see a pattern emerge of promises made, profits observed, money 'invested' - followed by withdrawals refused and finally correspondence ignored and then silence. If you sent the money using Debit or Credit card, you may well be able to make a chargeback through your bank, stating " Services promised were not received". The banks and card companies ar slowly waking up to the fact that thousands of people are being robbed by these scamming bandits and they are in fact complicit in allowing the scammers to continue using their 'Fintec' services. This is clearly an easy GUILTY verdict from me!

I have used Google translate to try and present this in Spanish.

Este es un comportamiento típico de fraude y estafa por parte de un agente llamado. No es difícil llegar a una conclusión sin importar en qué idioma esté escrito el caso, el fraude es un fraude. Si se toma el tiempo de leer otros casos disponibles aquí en el sitio web de FPA, verá rápidamente un patrón de promesas hechas, ganancias observadas, dinero 'invertido', seguido de retiros rechazados y finalmente la correspondencia ignorada y luego silenciada. Si envió el dinero con tarjeta de débito o crédito, es posible que pueda realizar una devolución de cargo a través de su banco, indicando "No se recibieron los servicios prometidos". Los bancos y las compañías de tarjetas de crédito se están dando cuenta lentamente de que miles de personas están siendo robadas por estos bandidos estafadores y, de hecho, son cómplices de permitir que los estafadores continúen usando sus servicios "Fintec". ¡Esto es claramente un veredicto fácil de mi parte!
 
Back
Top