Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.
Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.
Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"
Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"
Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"
Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.
More info coming soon.
Dear forum members! I see it is useless to prove something on the forum. Nobody asked any proofs from Sebytim.
Dear traders, you will not believe me of course but the number of IFC website visitors from FPA grows. Thanks to this website I have already even got several supportive calls from different countries regarding this issue.
For FPA23: if you want to move this thread to the first place in google - I wish it to be the only aim in your life
For new members: We cancelled Sebytim's profit because he used a scam programm to oveturn prices: please read and see screenshots in the posts №11, 76, 88. He is the only man in the internet who accuses us.
So, I think it is enough, it is endless.
I'm always online if you have other questions or if somebody from our other traders has something to discuss.
Best regards, Quinton.
I don't see how ironic comments would help with google indexing.
There is no trading law that forbids capturing the spread.
This happens every day all around the world.
There is no trading law at all.
Well regulated brokers are subject to laws, rules, and regulations. This gives traders a last resort to file complaints against brokers that use abusive practices, like IFC Markets taking a client's money because of a "magic cheating EA"
and repeatedly failing to provide the smallest bit of evidence to show that this was physically possible.
Based on Quinton's continued evasiveness on this matter, I believe that he probably never even asked MetaQuotes if such documentation existed.
I suspect that he never even called them about the issue. Either way, Quinton never provided a single scrap of believable evidence to back up the allegation.
Hello!
Pay attention that complaint like Sebytim's one is the only complaint in the internet. All brokers evaluate their reputation and always withdraw trader's money, but when a trader tries to cheat the company the sanctions against him are strict and not discussed. I checked many threads on different forums and found out that very often traders who complain that a broker "refused to give profit" tried to use fraudulent robots (in our case) or abuse bonuses but couldn't manage to do this and lost their money: it is clear even to a child that they used arbitrage but forum members begin to accuse a company and don't accept any evidence saying something like "it is not enough" or "it is an edited picture"
The evidence to which I had access I published in the post 11. It fully shows the fraudulent work of Sebytim's robot.
I answer you for the second time: I didn't ask MetaQuotes if such documentation existed.
You can call them to Cyprus, ask to connect you with technical support in Russia and ask if a representative from IFC Markets contacted them. It was 22 februrary, they must remember this call. I ask you to publish here the result.