dbrawner
Private, 1st Class
- Messages
- 49
IMHO, Monetary or other "rewards" for voting is not the way to entice people to participate. I would not want my case decided by a group of people looking for a few bucks or a T-shirt any more than I want a president elected because they offer free food to homeless people or citizenship to illegal aliens. Nor would I want my case decided because someone felt they had to vote in order to maintain their access or standing in the FPA.
I want people voting on my case who understand the process and system which is in question (i.e. the business of trading) and who are willing to put some thought into weighing the evidence and facts presented and deciding on a fair solution or verdict.
I feel that if FPA provides a fair and impartial forum to evaluate broker performance in client dispute cases, it accomplishes at least two important functions. 1.) a place for traders to start their due diligence in broker selection, and 2.) leverage with brokerage firms in the form of an large and well organized group of traders. These benefits can only be achieved and maintained so long as the adjudication of these cases remains "fair and impartial".
Should they become virtual lynch mobs for angry and frustrated traders, then I will cease participation as the benefits described above would no longer be possible.
Our votes should be considered, thoughtful, and based on the available facts and evidence. Unfortunately there are times when the evidence is weak or the facts unknown and in such cases we cannot, must not, render a verdict on emotions or personal prejudices.
It is the spirit of the FPA and our voluntary participation that will ultimately dictate the success or failure of its mission and subsequent benefit to the trading community.
I want people voting on my case who understand the process and system which is in question (i.e. the business of trading) and who are willing to put some thought into weighing the evidence and facts presented and deciding on a fair solution or verdict.
I feel that if FPA provides a fair and impartial forum to evaluate broker performance in client dispute cases, it accomplishes at least two important functions. 1.) a place for traders to start their due diligence in broker selection, and 2.) leverage with brokerage firms in the form of an large and well organized group of traders. These benefits can only be achieved and maintained so long as the adjudication of these cases remains "fair and impartial".
Should they become virtual lynch mobs for angry and frustrated traders, then I will cease participation as the benefits described above would no longer be possible.
Our votes should be considered, thoughtful, and based on the available facts and evidence. Unfortunately there are times when the evidence is weak or the facts unknown and in such cases we cannot, must not, render a verdict on emotions or personal prejudices.
It is the spirit of the FPA and our voluntary participation that will ultimately dictate the success or failure of its mission and subsequent benefit to the trading community.