Archi
Private, 1st Class
- Messages
- 89
Hello, I have opened account #45689735 on the name in company MRC Markets (Forex with MRC - trading in Forex. An access to a currency market Forex. Forex quotes, trading strategies, news, forecasts), and deposit it on 100 USD. After deterioration of trading conditions (the spread 32 points) has decided to deduce money. The companies has requested two documents proving the identity, notarially assured both officially translated, and two documents certifying the registration, also notarially assured and officially translated. Though in the contract it has not been told that the company will demand four documents officially assured by the notary. I haven't executed this requirement, as it isn't meaningful, services of the notary will manage to me more expensively my deposit, being guided by the accented trading agreement, point 11 which says that the agreement can be terminated at any time, if claims to me from the company aren't present, (I have an answer from the company in which is told that claims to me aren't present) and the sum of the deposit of the trading account will be returned on my bank account, has decided to terminate the agreement. Except as presence of claims for not return of my money from the trading account in the contract isn't present anything. But the company on the former doesn't deduce means, referring to universal practice, but having resulted a uniform example. Though I resulted examples of that in universal practice the documents assured by the notary for withdrawal don't demand, the scanned copies demand only. And I have sent the scanned copies of documents, also I spend withdrawal by the same a way as deposit, and there is a possibility to deduce means for my bank account for my name.
Having seen responses at various forums, I have understood that I not the first who refuse the deposit as four notarially certified documents, and their transfer to Austria, often costs more expensively the deposit. I consider that the company doesn't satisfy a condition of the contract, and also uses blanks in the contract to own advantage that is rough infringement of business ethics.
Circumstances specifically changed! MRC broke the contract and don't return money. Proofs at the end of article.
Having seen responses at various forums, I have understood that I not the first who refuse the deposit as four notarially certified documents, and their transfer to Austria, often costs more expensively the deposit. I consider that the company doesn't satisfy a condition of the contract, and also uses blanks in the contract to own advantage that is rough infringement of business ethics.
Circumstances specifically changed! MRC broke the contract and don't return money. Proofs at the end of article.
Last edited: