Brandon,
Thank you for the info. I discovered similar information on the web Googling that same phone number (also seen on my bank statement in November 2013). Unfortunately, my bank would not reverse the transaction. I lost $3,500 from this copier service and can relate to the shocking trade performance and his roundabout tactics.
It appears that this individual has since taken down a few of the websites you listed unrelated to Forex trading. I don't know where I made the connection, but I thought he may have been involved with a roofing business at some point (he had a cartoon about roofing somehow associated with the number, and which also used the same robot voice as on his Forex websites).
This man is a criminal. It is a shame that many of his victims are traders who are genuinely reaching out for help. I actually drafted up a small claim that I am ready to serve. My wife is a top attorney in both California and Minnesota. We intend to pursue this case aggressively and we may involve her friend at the DA's office in Orange County. We also may consider filing a class action lawsuit if we can get first get adequate information about "Joseph Fibonacci".
Below is my statement of claim and summons (which I'm sure many of you can relate to). Please update me on any information you may find on "Joseph Fibonacci". We may try to engage the National Future Association or Securities Exchange Commission on a proactive level if needed, as they can access hosting history and other information to help identify him.
Defendant posted false and misleading foreign exchange trading performance on his website to induce people to purchase a membership for his mirror trading program, which would mirror trades he makes. Defendant also used a chat room to create the illusion of beefed up performance. Defendant represented that he never had a losing month and that he would never have a losing month, guaranteeing that if people purchased a membership, they would make money with the program that copied his trades. I purchased a $200 membership in reliance on the fraudulent performance information and other false representations he had advertised. For the two months I was a member, both of the months were losing months. Defendant also breached fiduciary duties and contract by using a stop loss of 2x larger than the maximum stop-loss he said he would use on his website. As a result of Defendant's fraudulent representations, I lost $3,523. Defendant promised to a 60-day money back guarantee. Despite my several emails to him (trying his only form of contact), he never responded and failed to provide any of my money back. I have screen shots of all performance claims on his website, which he continued to update falsely. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Minnesota Statue Section 543.19 subd. 1 because Defendant both solicited business from and transacted business within Minnesota.
