I do not waste my time with useless arguments. All of us know what zulutrade had done and are continuing.
I didn't say am against them or their whole service but against their
unrealistic rules that can't be applied for forex.
For example: If a provider has a negative month means that was gambling and must not be paid, when other months are positive
You didn't answer my main question: Had zulutrade pay you(or any follower) for any loss??? You know they do not pay for providers on negative months, where had the money gone
?
My reply to zulutrade case is clear like snow. When someone like you want to defend a company like what you're doing, you must be at least benefiting from something.
But in your case, you(followers) are not get paid your least rights by zulutrade, when they take providers commissions for
rules, and they name it under "protecting followers" like you said, logic don't say that the money(of commissions) must go to followers that had been affected as a refund process for loss.
It's too overwhelming and offbase to take both SP's you mentioned their names as examples: one with 5K and the other with 2K
Respect others forex minds at FPA by giving examples of some Real Providers
Once more: Had zulutrade pay you(or any follower) for any loss??? You know they do not pay for providers on negative months, where had the money gone
?
When you want to clap for a company against its clients, at least stand with the RIGHT & Logic or have some benefits(don't know what's your bonuses
for your defend.
If either this nor that is found, do not put yourself in the position of defending a company.
With full respect for all people, but one of the most stupid childish things that a person might think of or do in life is being happy for the bad of others, just in the name of revenge even if that do not actually help yourself in anything.