The broker promised to investigate back in February. Since then, Chris To had been in contact with them. If they had bothered to even send a "we're looking into it" message to the FPA, this case wouldn't have gone to the open cases folder.
If a broker decides they want to suspend an account for any reason, they need to specify a reasonable time frame. If a broker decides to confiscate funds under AML rules, they need to provide the client with a real reason, not just vague accusations.
I see absolutely no reason not to vote GUILTY right now. If the broker suddenly pays or provides documentation about why they shouldn't pay, the verdict can be overturned.