• Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.

    Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.

    Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"

    Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"

    Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"

    Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
    Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.

    More info coming soon.

Discuss Crypto in the Crosshairs. The CFTC vs. Binance.

General discussions of a financial company


FPA Forums and Reviews Admin
Crypto in the Crosshairs.
The CFTC vs. Binance.com


The regulatory crackdown on cryptos has a new chapter.

The last regulator in the world any broker wants a problem with is the US Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). If the US is connected to a broker or its clients in any way, the CFTC is ready to claim jurisdiction.

US regulations for crypto trading are still evolving, but in general, cryptos are considered to be commodities. Binance.us directly offers services to US traders, but is not registered with the CFTC. Binance.com is not supposed to offer services to US traders, and is charged with deliberately guiding clients around the rules. The two main methods were telling the client to use an offshore IP addresses or to set up offshore holding companies. So far, all the charges are civil, not criminal.

Here's the text of the CFTC Press Release...

Release Number 8680-23

CFTC Charges Binance and Its Founder, Changpeng Zhao, with Willful Evasion of Federal Law and Operating an Illegal Digital Asset Derivatives Exchange

March 27, 2023

Washington, D.C. — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today announced it has filed a civil enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois charging Changpeng Zhao and three entities that operate the Binance platform with numerous violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations. The complaint also charges Samuel Lim, Binance’s former chief compliance officer, with aiding and abetting Binance’s violations.

The complaint charges that Binance Holdings Limited, Binance Holdings (IE) Limited, and Binance (Services) Holdings Limited (together, Binance) operate the Binance centralized digital asset trading platform along with numerous other corporate vehicles through an intentionally opaque common enterprise, with Zhao at the helm as Binance’s owner and chief executive officer. The defendants allegedly chose to knowingly disregard applicable provisions of the CEA while engaging in a calculated strategy of regulatory arbitrage to their commercial benefit.

In its continuing litigation against the defendants, the agency seeks disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, permanent trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the CEA and CFTC regulations, as charged.

“Today’s enforcement action demonstrates that there is no location, or claimed lack of location, that will prevent the CFTC from protecting American investors. I have been clear that the CFTC will continue to use all of its authority to find and stop misconduct in the volatile and risky digital asset market,” said CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam. “For years, Binance knew they were violating CFTC rules, working actively to both keep the money flowing and avoid compliance. This should be a warning to anyone in the digital asset world that the CFTC will not tolerate willful avoidance of U.S. law. I applaud the diligent and dedicated work of the CFTC’s Enforcement team in bringing this action, and for their hard work in addressing illegal operations in the digital asset space.”

“Defendants’ alleged willful evasion of U.S. law is at the core of the Commission’s complaint against Binance. The defendants’ own emails and chats reflect that Binance’s compliance efforts have been a sham and Binance deliberately chose – over and over – to place profits over following the law,” said Gretchen Lowe, CFTC’s Enforcement Division Principal Deputy Director and Chief Counsel. “Today’s enforcement action reflects that the CFTC and its Enforcement Division will pursue those digital asset platforms and individuals who flout and actively attempt to circumvent CFTC regulatory requirements. I thank the Enforcement team for their dedication and hard work in bringing this action.”

Case Background

According to the complaint, Binance has offered and executed commodity derivatives transactions to and for U.S. persons from July 2019 through the present. As alleged, Binance’s compliance program has been ineffective and, at Zhao’s direction, Binance has instructed its employees and customers to circumvent compliance controls in order to maximize corporate profits.

The complaint charges that for much of the relevant period, Binance did not require its customers to provide any identity-verifying information before trading on the platform, despite the legal duty that entities like Binance functioning as futures commission merchants (FCMs) collect such information, and failed to implement basic compliance procedures designed to prevent and detect terrorist financing and money laundering.

The complaint further alleges that even after Binance purported to restrict U.S. customers from trading on its platform, Binance instructed its customers – in particular its commercially valuable U.S.-based VIP customers – on the best methods for evading Binance’s compliance controls. In addition, the complaint charges Binance with acting as a designated contract market or swap execution facility based on its role in facilitating derivatives transactions without registering with the CFTC, as required.

The complaint also charges the entity defendants with failing to diligently supervise Binance’s activities as an FCM. Among the numerous supervisory failures detailed in the complaint is Binance’s instruction to employees to communicate with U.S.-based customers concerning control evasion through a messaging application that was set to automatically delete written communications. According to the complaint, the reason Binance used that communication method was to avoid leaving any evidence of their efforts to retain U.S.-based customers.

The complaint further charges the Binance, Zhao and Lim with willful evasion of the requirements of the CEA. As alleged, the defendants conducted certain activities outside the U.S. designed to avoid CFTC regulation, such as intentionally structuring their entities and transactions to avoid registration requirements and instructing U.S. customers as well as other customers as to how to evade Binance’s compliance controls.

As alleged, Zhao is liable for Binance’s violations based on his control over Binance and his long-running failure to act in good faith concerning Binance’s misconduct. According to the complaint, Zhao owned and controlled dozens of entities that operate the Binance platform as a common enterprise. Zhao is alleged to have been responsible for all major strategic decisions at Binance, including devising the secret plot to instruct U.S.-based VIP customers to evade Binance’s compliance controls and instructing Binance employees to ensure all communications about their control subversion took place over applications that facilitated the automatic destruction of evidence.

Lim, Binance’s CCO from 2018 through 2022, is charged with willfully aiding and abetting Binance’s violations through intentional conduct that undermined Binance’s compliance program. Lim is also charged with conducting activities to willfully evade or attempt to evade applicable provisions of the CEA, including promoting the use of “creative means” to assist customers in circumventing Binance’s compliance controls and implementing a corporate policy that instructed Binance’s U.S. customers to access the trading facility through a virtual private network to avoid Binance’s IP address-based controls or create “new” accounts through off-shore shell companies to evade Binance’s KYC-based controls.

The Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this matter are Candy Haan, Joseph Platt, Joseph Patrick, Matthew Edelstein, Ray Lavko, Elizabeth N. Pendleton, Scott R. Williamson, and Robert T. Howell.

First, the collapse of FTX bank. Now this CFTC action against the biggest crypto exchange. I think cryptocurrencies are going to be facing a lot more regulatory scrutiny in the coming months.

Learn more about the CFTC here. If you've been the victim of a forex, binary, or crypto scam, click here for a step-by-step guide to filing a complaint with the CFTC.

Original CFTC Press Release

PDF of the court complaint

Statement of Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson in support of the complaint

Photo by Kanchanara.
This part in the court complaint is comedy gold:

"While Binance has maintained offices in numerous
locations, including Singapore, Malta, Dubai, and Tokyo at various times during the Relevant
Period, Binance intentionally does not disclose the location of its executive offices. Instead,
Zhao has stated that Binance’s headquarters is wherever he is located at any point in time,
reflecting a deliberate approach to attempt to avoid regulation.

If that's true, every country he's visited since allowing people to open accounts without providing IDs should charge him with AML violations. I'll bet that would make him decide to suddenly claim the company is really located in some dodgy island jurisdiction that doesn't bother to enforce laws about money laundering.

I know some people love cryptos. They are an interesting concept, but there's NOTHING to back them up other than a pile of calculations. Sooner or later, I expect this bubble to pop louder and faster than when the .com bubble started to blow out in 2000. The difference is that the .com stocks were just massively overvalued, whereas cryptos have no actual intrinsic value at all.
Zhao has stated that Binance’s headquarters is wherever he is located at any point in time,
reflecting a deliberate approach to attempt to avoid regulation.
That’s not fair :D who says they hold no authorization, just scroll down left side E 2022-037, still valid so maybe their FOS will help or probably send you to their prosecutor also on the job, it seems.


"Alone in Europe, the financial markets authority agreed on May 4 to register Binance, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchange platforms, since entangled in the crash and accused of money laundering. Worse: the deputy director of legal affairs of the AMF was hired by Binance.