GUILTY Case# 2015-172 | Chandramohan Khetwal vs interactive-option.com

[voyteck]

HAHA CLASSIC ON BODY KNOW NOTHING MONEY GONE NO BODY KNOWS WHERE.....NOW BIG INVESTIGATION....RESULT WILLBE INCONCLUSIVE TYPICAL SCAM........GUILTY TO ME

 

[novatrice1]

Hard to know who did what.
My vote is neutral for now.
Without interactive response option it passes guilty, lack of defense confirms the facts

 

[Chandramohan Khetwal]

interactiveoption.com have done the similar things with so many traders by doing trading in their account. Check on FPA and on Google also.

 

[Arsus Kickus]

I need more info ... did he sign a LPOA for the bloke to trade on his behalf? If so, then, technically, the trader's actions were pre-authorised ... and, as per most (all?) BO brokers, they are not trying to really make you money in the long run ... but, otherwise, if no LPOA exists, then I don't know what is going on in this case. Was his account attached to "a group of professional traders" who did the trading for Chandramohan (a managed account)? If so, as a bucket broker, they are not trying to make the trader money, unless it is to drag more funds out of them in "secured" trades to follow ...

 

[Chandramohan Khetwal]

I tried to contact Interactive to share IP Adresses but they are unable to do so. They are just saying me one sentence that their risk department is investigating and regarding IP addresses of trades, they are saying that it is in your location IP Address. They are absolute lying. Sometimes they say that some type of Robotic you did active in your account to trade automatically.

 

[F***X]

The evidence supports the claim that a withdrawal request was placed on 17th September 2015, prior to when the following 2 large losers -$170 and -$171 were purportedly placed by broker on the 18th of September 2015 at around 8:26 am GMT against a strong trend, so if the trader is in NY time zone in North Amerca, this would have been around 4:30 am, different time frame from all other trades.

The large losses don't follow the normal pattern or strategy of all the other trades, and I would agree that it was fabricated by the broker, and was placed at a unique time frames different from the normal trades, and loses are far greater than the average losers of the normal trades which according to the statements were placed on or before 17 August 2015.

• -$45 x 3 = -$135 sum of all losers displayed made normally are -$45
  
• $241.20 = sum of all winning trades, average winners are $80

So there's definitely a winning method here, and this deceitful, dishonest, cheating, low down, dirty, rotten, stinking, scum bag, BUCKET SHOP broker:

Interactive-option.com
doesn't like winning traders!

So again, the trades are probably sitting on a demo server and unfortunately they can't pull the hypothetical profits and convert it into real cash to cover any withdrawals now can they?

 

[Pharaoh]

Interactive Option doesn't mind winning traders. Interactive Option doesn't like traders who try to withdraw money.

It's amazing how many reports there are of binary casinos having mysterious losing trades appear shortly after a withdrawal is requested.

GUILTY!

 

[leifa]

I would urge anyone that has both made profit on binary trading, and has been able to withdraw their earnings, to step forward! Till proved wrong, I would claim that this is impossble. GUILTY.

 

[Arsus Kickus]

F**X articulated it well ... yep. Amazing that losing trades appear after you request a withdrawal, eh? ... Guilty.

 

[Makaram]

Guilty for lack of effective communication lying weird contracts and suspicious platform