Jason Aleksei
Failed ALL tests of his claimed psychic abilities.
- Messages
- 19
So you don't think I am just blowing off Q2, let me address the workload required to achieve those results.
2. Poor target set up. Typically you need a single white envelope and stick a single content inside the envelope. On the outside of the envelope should be a set of target reference numbers that you would give to the viewer after you seal the envelope. Usually a picture is used in the envelope.
a) In 10 minutes of work if I didn't know it was an animal, I could tell you it was a lifeform. After 40 minutes I could probably identify it as an animal as opposed to a human on the basis of lower level emotions associated with the animal as opposed to the human. I could probably render a fair sketch of the lifeform at that time. The sketch might be on, it might not.
b) Determining the difference between paper and metal would be pretty straight forward, 40 minutes of work. If you had one of each that would be hard as there isn't much difference between an envelope and a paper bill.
c) That is a time consuming problem set that would take about 8-15 hours of session work.
d) Symbolic in nature and thus difficult, but not impossible, 1-2 hours of session work.
e) Symbolic in nature, no idea how to even tackle that. If that year corresponded to the year it was manufactured, maybe, 2-3 hours IF I could figure out a setup.
f) Same time requirements as in a) most likely.
A lot of people make the mistake of thinking just because almost anything can be known, that we are some psychic sitting in a room getting answers that quickly. That is not at all how it works. Some things are relatively easy to determine, other things are very complex such as tracking an asteroid sitting outside Jupiter's orbit that hasn't been picked up yet by conventional telescopes that will be coming soon to a planet near you. I admit I am a lazy minimalist. That helps in remote viewing as finding the simplest most efficient way of determining a solution to a problem is the best. Usually the question asked isn't worth the time it takes to determine the answer at all. I hope that helps explain the reluctance of a viewer to undertake a target set up by someone who is not appropriately "skilled in the art." Further consider that doing any more than 2 hours of this a day can be physically draining. It burns B12 like crazy.
2. I have sitting next to me a red envelope with an animal on it. There are 2 pieces of currency and one other item sitting on the envelope. After I post this, I'll place the money and item into the envelope and put it in a display cabinet where it should remain undisturbed.
Your task is to tell me:
a. What animal is on the envelope?
b. Is the currency 2 bills, 2 coins, or one of each?
c. What county issued each piece of currency?
d. What denominations are they?
e. What year is on each one?
f. What is the other item?
Make me very impressed on questions 1 and 2, and I can arrange a modest live account for you to manage using your technique. Impress me with your skills managing that account and I'll happily form a partnership with you to promote your skills.
2. Poor target set up. Typically you need a single white envelope and stick a single content inside the envelope. On the outside of the envelope should be a set of target reference numbers that you would give to the viewer after you seal the envelope. Usually a picture is used in the envelope.
a) In 10 minutes of work if I didn't know it was an animal, I could tell you it was a lifeform. After 40 minutes I could probably identify it as an animal as opposed to a human on the basis of lower level emotions associated with the animal as opposed to the human. I could probably render a fair sketch of the lifeform at that time. The sketch might be on, it might not.
b) Determining the difference between paper and metal would be pretty straight forward, 40 minutes of work. If you had one of each that would be hard as there isn't much difference between an envelope and a paper bill.
c) That is a time consuming problem set that would take about 8-15 hours of session work.
d) Symbolic in nature and thus difficult, but not impossible, 1-2 hours of session work.
e) Symbolic in nature, no idea how to even tackle that. If that year corresponded to the year it was manufactured, maybe, 2-3 hours IF I could figure out a setup.
f) Same time requirements as in a) most likely.
A lot of people make the mistake of thinking just because almost anything can be known, that we are some psychic sitting in a room getting answers that quickly. That is not at all how it works. Some things are relatively easy to determine, other things are very complex such as tracking an asteroid sitting outside Jupiter's orbit that hasn't been picked up yet by conventional telescopes that will be coming soon to a planet near you. I admit I am a lazy minimalist. That helps in remote viewing as finding the simplest most efficient way of determining a solution to a problem is the best. Usually the question asked isn't worth the time it takes to determine the answer at all. I hope that helps explain the reluctance of a viewer to undertake a target set up by someone who is not appropriately "skilled in the art." Further consider that doing any more than 2 hours of this a day can be physically draining. It burns B12 like crazy.
Last edited: