Recent content by MattRobinson

Just run with default settings on version 1.2. That gives the same results as version 1.1.

Hi Randy There is no version 1.3 yet. 1.2 is the latest one released in August 2010. When running version 1.2 with default settings it gives exactly the same results as version 1.1.

I see the EURJPY settings are still not fixed on the FPA demo... Luckily it's been doing well yesterday. But this skews the results considerably and gives massive spikes in the equity curve. Compare the lot size on EURJPY to the other pairs...

No, the EA doesn't check this. With the MAOpenFilter set to true it will check the 50 and 100 SMA for directional confirmation. But I think in almost all cases the 20SMA will be in the same direction as the trade.

Thanks for you extensive testing Ken. I am sure there are more pairs that will be profitable. Not just the 8 recommended ones.

Yes indeed. I see there was a loss on that pair today... With the recommended settings the loosing % of EURJPY is a lot higher than with the other pairs. So its definitely a good idea to reduce the Risk setting on it. Hence the recommended Risk of 2. Compared to 15 for the other pairs. It looks...

All the recommended settings are based purely on back tests for 2010. It is not 100% optimized settings, but should give fairly good results, without having a too large risk/reward ratio. Although some pairs have much higher SLs than TPs. I am running version 1.0 settings on my own accounts...

Hi there guys One of my customers asked me to join in on the discussion here and explain a couple of things... 1. It seems as if the settings for EURJPY is not inline with the other pairs on the FPA demo test. All the other pairs seem to trade at a fixed lot size? and EURJPY be set on...