Recent content by piphog

  1. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    I wasn't ignoring him at all. He's being repetitive, so there's no need to address what has already been addressed. The fact is my preliminary dataset shows that brokers simply don't offer downside leverage flexibility, they are forcing a minimum of 100:1, so the whole car analogy really is...
  2. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    Well if you re-read my original, I was asking you if you wanted to co-author the paper with me, since we are on either side of the issue. I have already taken a sample of 10 and not surprisingly i've found that all of them force a minimum of 100:1 leverage in trading, no surprise there. but I...
  3. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    Shoot. I couldn't figure out a way to PM you, so I hope you read this. As I said in the previous post we could collect data to write a brief paper on the practices of retail FX brokers with respect to their leverage policies, marketing, and any number of other variables. I think such a study...
  4. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    Ive never been called a liberal before by anyone LOL. The fact is that over-leverage creates issues in OTC trading. If you want to take excessive leverage, by all means trade the futures that have limited counterparty risk, and with a clearinghouse it is much safer. You are a retail...
  5. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    Wow, so typical to quote Congress when it suits you, then call them idiots when you disagree. That was only one random congressman who stated that, so saying "Congress agrees with us" is total bull****. So, basically your argument boils down to "we are worried that all these brokers will go...
  6. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    I am going to ignore your original ad hominem in calling me uneducated on this. As someone who has worked in S&T for different investment banks for years now, and judging by your remarks, it is you who is the less educated one, not myself. Yes, futures trading has higher leverage. But you and...
  7. P

    Why Do Some Retail Traders Hate Sensible Regulations?

    I've been looking over some of these posts about people fuming over the proposed regulation to reduce leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. This reminds me of the furor over the regulation by CFTC through the NFA to ban offsetting ("hedging") positions in the same currency pair -- a practice that has...
  8. P

    House Lawmakers Concerned On CFTC Retail Forex Leverage Proposal

    He doesnt get what they are trying to accomplish? I guess he doesnt understand that retail brokers that require 100:1 trading are tandamount to casinos -- and the lemmings who are crying foul are like the dedicated slots players fighting evil sensible regulations. Let's not forget that 95% of...
  9. P

    Why Do Most Traders Lose

    Simple: because most brokers force 100:1 leverage, so they encourage excessive risk-taking so they trade more and lose more (thus feeding market makers and general broker business models). Everyone should be contacting the CFTC in support of the new regulations that will protect amateurs who...
  10. P

    CALL TO ACTION: CFTC 10:1 - Share what you wrote here

    Because these regulations are sensible and protect amateur inexperienced traders from predatory broker behaviour? These regulations WILL pass, and 90% of the **** brokers out there will fail as a result of people no longer feeding them.
  11. P

    CALL TO ACTION: CFTC 10:1 - Share what you wrote here

    To whom it may concern at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission: I am writing to express my support, as a responsible FOREX trader, for the proposed restrictions on leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. It is absolutely absurd how these brokers prey on traders by, in many cases, REQUIRING 100:1...
  12. P

    If the CFTC does this, say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

    I think it's hilarious that posts are being screened by mods and whoever isnt blindly attacking the CFTC's sensible proposal is having their posts removed. no one will probably be able to see this, but the FPA is the biggest hypocritical ****hole -- censoring opinions that agree with the CFTC...
  13. P

    If the CFTC does this, say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

    Wrong. The math isnt the same. I love how youre trying to talk your way out of the fact that borrowing 10x as much money to trade with is not taking more risk. It has nothing to do with "doing the math". If you trade by borrowing 100x the amount of money you use, its ridiculous and out of...
  14. P

    If the CFTC does this, say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

    MORE LEVERAGE = STOPPING OUT FASTER. THERE IS NO REASON TO USE MORE CAPITAL TO TRADE AN AMMOUNT -- IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO TRADE 10:1, USE THE CAPITAL -- TRADING 100:1 IS TOO RISKY! THEY WANT YOU TO STOP OUT FASTER -- THE MARKET MAKING RETAIL BROKERS WANT YOU TO LOSE! USE ONLY...
  15. P

    If the CFTC does this, say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

    Music Man If I can't win with 100:1 leverage, then how come I'm up 20% for the year to date? This market does not destroy anything, but fools and their money are soon parted, Forex trading or not. MM -------------------------- Bull****. I dont buy Pharoah's argument that using...
Back
Top