Recent content by richard swaby

The first case filled for a chargeback and received a refund. The second case I have had contact with last week and they asked for the latest version of the EA. If they would like a refund in the future I will be more than happy to grant one. Those of whom I am aware of have received a refund...

Please read through my post again, the answer to your question is there.

Hi Traders (and detectives), I am happy to receive feedback and discuss issues related to the EA (including updates, it's performance and how it can be improved), but I am posting this so that all of the accusations, name calling, insults, etc, stop once and for all. I am a software developer...

Hello Traders, Over a year has passed since the original version of the Two Percent Daily EA was released and I think it is time I answer back the critics. It can be very frustrating being called a scammer when the solution is usually a couple of lines of code, but some traders do not want...

Hello Traders, Over a year has passed since the original version of the Two Percent Daily EA was released and I think it is time I answer back the critics. It can be very frustrating being called a scammer when the solution is usually a couple of lines of code, but some traders do not want...

Hello Traders, Over a year has passed since the original version of the Two Percent Daily EA was released and I think it is time I answer back the critics. It can be very frustrating being called a scammer when the solution is usually a couple of lines of code, but some traders do not want...

I did not intentionally mislead as you are suggesting. Clear no refund policy now to avoid any confusion.

I was told by Bill to come in here and explain how my wording about the availability of a refund wasn't deceptive and about what happened to the refund I was discussing with Nino. Wording of refund availability: 1. Nino asked for a discount and I gave it to him 2. Nino asked if the refund...

He did not ask if the 60 day guarantee would still apply, he asked if it was still available. The answer to his question is yes, it was still available. He then used the discount link, which the terms state is not covered in the guarantee. SO, the guarantee was still available, but the buyer was...

I said the guarantee was available, but I did not state that it was available for the discount link! Nor was I applying that it was. This is against the terms. Nino should have read those terms before buying, it is not my responsibility to constantly remind customers of the terms, I have a page...

@equalizer - I said the guarantee was still valid, as it was. I did not however say that it was valid for the discount link! That is against my terms! There were no new terms agreed, nor new proposal of terms! The buyer was presented with the discount link, but was under no obligation to use it...

If the logic of the FPA is that "it does not matter what the terms say", then anyone could put a claim against anyone else! Infact, I may just open an account with every single broker and blow all the accounts. I will then blame the brokers who will refer me to their terms that state "we are not...

If the logic of the FPA is that "it does not matter what the terms say", then anyone could put a claim against anyone else! Infact, I may just open an account with every single broker and blow all the accounts. I will then blame the brokers who will refer me to their terms that state "we are not...

The bottom line is this: The terms on the site that the buyer agreed to upon purchase state that there are no refunds for discounted links. What is said after and what is said here on the FPA is secondary to the terms that the buyer agress to upon purchase. They are set in stone and I am 100%...

No it is not! I took it out. We are referring to the EA here, not the manual method - they are seperate. I believe you are looking at the homepage which is for the manual method that is sold via clickbank and refunds are given as per clickbanks policy. The EA is on a seperate page and not...