Forex FOREX PRO WEEKLY, May 04 - 08, 2026

Sive Morten

Special Consultant to the FPA
Messages
22,093
FUNDAMENTALS

Despite that hype around M. East conflict is not fading, this week, finally we've got a lot of economy data, statistics that give a lot of reasons to think about situation in EU and US. Sentiment of big central banks is changing and expectations on soon rate cut is fading. This happens on a background of uncertainty, when nobody knows yet the total effect of oil crisis.

MARKET OVERVIEW

Major central banks left interest rates unchanged this week but warned that they could raise them soon to prevent a jump in energy prices, caused by the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, spilling over into a surge in broader inflation.

The dollar was headed for its biggest weekly loss against the yen since ‌February on Friday after Japan was reported to have intervened to support its currency.
"Given that the authorities conducted FX interventions during the Golden Week holiday in 2024, and that interventions in both 2022 and 2024 were carried out on consecutive days, the risk of additional intervention – even during the holiday period – remains, if USDJPY rebounds sharply towards 160," said Barclays analysts led by Shinichiro Kadota. "Looking at past patterns, consecutive interventions have not necessarily been triggered only when USDJPY returned to the previous intervention level; rather, authorities have tended to step in again when the pair rebounded sharply."

The European Central Bank and the Bank of England held interest rates steady on Thursday, in line with expectations, following earlier pauses by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan. However, both the ECB and BOJ signalled they could begin raising rates as soon as June to curb inflationary ⁠pressure stemming from higher imported energy costs.
“While markets are pricing roughly a two-thirds chance of a June hike from the BOJ, expectations for Fed cuts have largely evaporated,” Shinohara said. “That divergence, alongside a more hawkish Fed, limits the scope for sustained yen appreciation.”

The Federal Reserve also left rates unchanged on Wednesday, with one policymaker dissenting in favor of a rate cut and ⁠three others dissenting because they felt the U.S. central bank's policy statement should no longer communicate a bias toward monetary policy easing. The Fed’s 8–4 vote marked its most ‌divided decision since 1992, underscoring the challenge incoming Fed Chair Kevin Warsh will face in pushing for rate cuts. Speaking at a press conference, Powell said that despite dissent from four officials who opposed maintaining an easing bias, he does not see the Fed tilting toward raising interest rates.
"The main thing is that announcement revealed that there are three people thinking that we should be hiking interest rates or should not have an easing bias ⁠and that we should be worried about inflation," said Juan Perez, director of trading at Monex USA in Washington. "Kevin Warsh seems a lot like Powell and is likely not going to be a dove. He's also not entering a Fed that is thinking of stimulus; they're actually thinking hawkishly. And then more importantly, in the global perspective, central banking has a lack of consensus, which is actually helping the U.S. dollar," Perez said.

Warsh is expected to advocate for rate cuts, though surging energy prices linked to the Iran conflict could make other members of the central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee cautious.
"It's not a meeting where rates policy is on the front burner, but the FOMC assessment ⁠of the economy may improve," said Steve Englander, global head of G10 FX research at Standard Chartered in New York. "The inflation picture is improving very slowly at best and could be an emerging issue for Warsh to deal with" when he takes office.
"The markets and those following the Fed have kind of said, well, this new Fed chair is going to be dovish regardless," said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments. "And I think as we get closer to that time, with this meeting ... with the data not really helping the cause for cuts, you add it all up and it's not clear that the ⁠Fed should cut or that the Fed will cut."

Indeed, following the meeting, futures pricing indicated markets had ruled out cuts for the remainder of the year. But not everyone had taken rate cuts off the table entirely this year. Analysts at Citi ⁠said in a note that they continue "to project that cooler inflation and renewed loosening labor markets" will lead to rate reductions in September, adding that "rate cuts can be rapidly priced back in by markets if oil prices fall."

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday he is not worried about inflation, but added among the worst-case scenarios for the economy is the risk of stagflation. Dimon reiterated his view that a credit market downturn could be ⁠worse than expected.
(Some firms) "may be brilliant, but I guarantee you not all 1,000 of them are," he said. "We haven't had a credit recession in so long, so when we have one, it will be worse than people think," Dimon said.
"The worst case is stagflation, and I just wouldn't take it off the list," Dimon said. "My view is that there are a lot of inflationary things out there, including the Iran War, the re-militarization of the ⁠world, the infrastructure needs of the world, and our deficits," he added.
1777714893107.webp


The shock is tightening overall financial conditions across developed markets, though the impact remains limited in many countries, according to widely tracked Goldman Sachs indexes. Conditions have tightened modestly in the euro zone and Japan, driven by rising borrowing costs and falling equities. Britain stands out, with a much sharper tightening that points to a heavier growth hit.
1777715103527.webp


Jefferies chief European economist Mohit Kumar said both the scale and nature of the stagflation shock differ across regions. U.S. business activity picked up in April, though output prices jumped. Consumer ‌inflation expectations ⁠for the year ahead jumped to 4.7% this month from 3.8% in March, while market-based gauges have also moved higher.
"Inflation will still be higher in the U.S. but that's an oil price impact, the impact on growth is much less in the U.S. than Europe."

Efforts to resolve the conflict have hit an impasse, which the U.S. is trying to unlock with a naval blockade of Iran's oil exports, Tehran's economic lifeline. U.S. President Donald Trump is due to receive a briefing on Thursday on plans for a series ⁠of fresh military strikes on Iran.
"Oil prices moved higher based on latest developments; and when oil prices move, yields tend to move higher and at the same time long-term inflation expectations haven't moved," said Axel Merk, president and chief investment officer at Merk Investments in Palo Alto, California. "Taking it together, this is a tightening of financial conditions and ⁠a raising of real interest rates, which is supportive for the dollar - meaning all else being equal that weakens other currencies," he said.
"We're having the traditional risk-off correlations since the Iran war - a rise in oil prices, a stronger dollar, higher U.S. yields, lower Fed rate cut expectations, and lower gold," said Eugene Epstein, head of structuring for North America at Moneycorp in New Jersey.

Global brokerages have gradually stepped back from earlier expectations of two U.S. interest rate cuts in 2026, with forecasts now split between some easing and none due to lingering inflation ‌risks and cautious policymakers. Morgan Stanley became the latest brokerage to drop expectations for rate cuts this year. At least eight brokerages, including J.P. Morgan and HSBC, bet on no rate cuts this year. Meanwhile, eight brokerages expect between 25 and 75 basis points (bps) of easing this year, with the majority of them expecting two 25 bps cuts.

Traders are now pricing in roughly a 40.5% probability of a rate hike by April 2027, up from about 8% before the Fed announced its decision, according to ⁠CME Fedwatch tool. "We see risks to our baseline view as skewed toward delayed rate cuts," Barclays said, which expects one 25 bps cut in September.

Data on Thursday showed euro zone inflation rose to 3% in April while the economy grew just 0.1% in the first quarter. Contracting business activity, tighter bank lending criteria and surging inflation expectations signal mounting pressure. Germany's IMK institute sees a 34% chance the bloc's largest economy slips into recession in the second quarter, up from 12% in March. ING's head of global macro Carsten Brzeski said another month of Hormuz disruption would likely trigger at ⁠least a technical euro zone recession.

The ECB's Consumer Expectations Survey showed inflation expectations for one year ahead jumped to 4.0% in March from 2.5% a month earlier while bets for three years out rose to 3.0% from 2.5%, both well above the ECB's 2% target. Policymakers may take some comfort in longer term inflation expectations, which barely moved in either the consumer or business survey.
"Taken together, the three surveys paint a gloomy picture," Alexander Valentin at Oxford Economics said. "We read these data as further evidence for ‌ECB ⁠rate hikes ahead, despite the growth-inflation dilemma the Governing Council now finds itself in."

European Central Bank policymakers are likely to raise interest rates at least twice, starting at their next meeting in June, unless a favourable resolution ‌to the Iran conflict quickly drags energy prices to pre-war levels, two sources close to the discussion told Reuters. Citing the ECB's baseline projections, published in March, the sources said ‌at ⁠least two rate hikes should be expected in this scenario. Some of these prospects were already discussed at Thursday's meeting, when a few policymakers argued in favour of a rate increase. One of the sources ⁠said that Thursday's discussion was mostly about June and there was little disagreement around the table that policy action will be necessary, unless ⁠there is a fundamental change in the outlook. Consumers expect a deep recession while banks see both a fall in loan demand and a rise in lending costs.
"This morning’s data provides more evidence that the war in the Middle ⁠East and the rise in energy prices are not only posing an inflationary shock but rather a stagflationary shock for the euro zone economy," ING economist Carsten Brzeski said. "Growing signs of adverse growth effects will make aggressive rate hikes less straightforward," he added.

⁠The European Commission Economic Sentiment Indicator fell to 93.0 this month from 96.6 a month earlier, coming well below expectations as the services component plunged to a five-year low. Selling price expectations meanwhile soared, after an already steep increase in the previous month, indicating that firms anticipate continued acceleration in overall inflation given high energy costs and possible supply shortages.

Eurostat said gross domestic product in the 21-country currency area rose 0.1% quarter-on-quarter in the three months to March, according to a flash reading. A string of surveys this week points to a further slowdown in activity, as it is mentioned above.

UK business activity has held up better so far, but risks are rising. The IMF hit Britain with the biggest growth downgrade among rich economies. Reflecting inflation worries, borrowing costs in Europe have risen faster than elsewhere as traders bet on higher UK and euro zone rates. Britain's two-year yields are up a percentage point since the war began.

WHAT IS HIDDEN

So the American consumer has become gloomy: the sentiment index is 49.8, which is at a historic low since the 1950s. Inflation expectations for the year are 4.7%, and for five years - 3.5%. Consumer sentiment has plummeted in the eurozone and the UK. Although for now, everything is being smoothed out with subsidies, and the market is confident that the budgets and central banks will save everyone.

In general, the situation is such that, at least in the next quarter or two, prices will be high, even if everything is resolved "tomorrow", although there is currently little chance of any quick solutions. The risk of falling to $150 is now higher than the risk of rising, although it is clear that Trump and Co. are extremely nervous about any approach to $120 per barrel, and indeed, holding above this level allows the market to hope that everything will "blow over". A consolidation above this level would force a review of these views.

Everybody talk about oil, but somehow misses the other thing. The average inflation for companies producing food and beverages increased by +7.9% year-on-year in March, which is the biggest jump in the last 12 months. This is +373 basis points more than +4.2% in February. The biggest jump was recorded for tomatoes - +102% year-on-year. Bearing in mind that no one plans to call it a day, in such a tempo we could hit 10% this year. And not just in food prices.
1777719024081.webp


The K-shaped economy is in a tailspin: Americans' financial situation in 2026 is also historically bad. According to Gallup, a record 55% of Americans now believe that their financial situation is getting worse - a higher level than during the Great Depression and the pandemic. Although this figure is similar to last year's 53%, it is higher than 47% in 2024, and this is the fifth consecutive year that more Americans say that their financial situation is getting worse rather than improving.

Situation in EU is hardly better. The Eurozone Economic Sentiment Index (ESI) fell for the third consecutive month to 93.0 in April 2026, reaching its lowest level since November 2020 and failing to meet market expectations of 95.2, reflecting growing concerns about economic prospects triggered by the escalation of the war with Iran. Sentiment deteriorated across all sectors - consumption, retail, services etc.. As for pricing, consumer inflation expectations rose by 5.6 points to 49.1, the highest level since April 2022, while producers' expectations regarding selling prices increased by 10.2 points, reaching a three-year high of 31.1.

In the Fed "Hawks" are increasing pressure - disagreements are growing ... Powell is leaving, but not leaving. the "hawks" rebelled a bit: Hammer, Kashkari, and Logan were against the wording in the press release, which indicates a "bias towards easing". Miran, as usual, wants a reduction of 0.25 p.p. Powell does not plan to leave the FED until the issue of criminal cases is finally resolved, remaining a member of the Board of Governors. According to Powell, the number of those in the FED who oppose maintaining a soft signal has increased (apparently, not only among voting members of the FOMC, but no one is advocating for a rate hike "right now". The situation will clarify in the next month or two. Although Powell generally smoothed out the corners, as he usually does, it is obvious that a split is forming in the FED with a shift of votes towards a more stringent policy. After all, Jerome Powell says the Fed's independence is "under threat."

1777719714748.webp


BoE and ECB are in a classic stagflationary dilemma: high inflation + weak growth. ECB: "The risks of rising inflation and the risks of slowing economic growth have intensified". For now, the statements are cautious, just like the Fed's - we need to wait for more clarity, so there are no direct signals about decisions on any policy changes, of course. Although the ECB slightly more clearly recognizes inflation risks, but at the Bank of England, one vote has already been for a rate hike of 0.25 p.p.

it is obvious that for now they are rather trying to smooth out the processes with rhetoric and are not ready for any reaction. But the scenarios suggest a risk of inflation rising to ~6% for both central banks. The Bank of England estimates that in this case it may need to raise the rate by 50-150 b.p. The yield on 30-year UK bonds on the day rewrote the 1999 highs, amounting to 5.7% per annum ... and the national debt will objectively be a strong constraint on the response to the inflationary shock.

Concerning the US GDP data, here is also a few interesting moments. The contribution of household consumption to the GDP growth of 1.1 percentage points was solely due to the consumption of services, while there was stagnation in goods (only prices are rising). In March, Americans' spending increased by 0.9% month-on-month. More than 2/5 of the total increase in spending was due to the rise in gasoline prices. Energy prices jumped by 11.6% month-on-month and 14.6% year-on-year, which was the main reason for the acceleration of inflation.

Powell's favorite indicator - the price index for services excluding housing - is growing by 0.3% month-on-month and 3.5% year-on-year, showing steady 3-4% growth per year. In fact, to the steady inflation of 3%+, which the Fed has not yet brought back to target values due to its "dovishness", are added shocks from tariffs and energy prices, forming a stagflationary agenda.

And now we're coming to most important thing that we talked about a couple weeks ago - Money supply dynamic. Particularly money supply should answer on the question on what way we're stepping in - either contraction of economy, deflation, and recession or stagflation. And now it seems that we're going on the 2nd way. First is, check the Fed balance. the Fed has added about 200 billion US Treasury bonds to its balance sheet over the past few months. Moderate quantitative easing is the new trend:

1777720306983.webp


Well, we can say that the main intrigue of the last two months has been resolved - the money supply has indeed accelerated in the US due to rising energy prices. And this is just March. Moreover, the growth of the money supply in March was as high as 2%, which is terrifying in annual terms if you calculate it.
1777720582977.webp


It doesn't look much like COVID yet (Grey area on the chart below). For now. By the end of May, we'll see what happened in April, when oil prices rose even more. Moreover, it's interesting to see why the S&P 500 hit a new all-time high in the first days of April and what fueled it.
1777720627690.webp
 
Obviously, this is not the Fed's actions, because their assets did not accelerate the growth. That is, the money is being multiplied by the banking sector. And probably that's why financial assets haven't fallen.

But the most interesting thing will start when the prices of oil/LNG/fertilizers (costs) finally start to decline. Just like after the lockdowns, when money was hoarded, but the supply chains hadn't recovered yet and the costs in the system were high. That is, the release of money from oil will start. And the main question is - how many months will new money be created and where will it go. Then, the eager citizens rushed into consumption and pushed prices up. Including the prices of financial assets.

Finally, amounting to $166 billion, which were deemed illegal, in accordance with a court ruling. So far, only 21% of import declarations have been processed. It's all happening one after the other. A series of fortunate coincidences. Exactly when the money supply started growing amid rising commodity prices, and practically everyone wrote that inflation would accelerate, as money should start flowing back from the budget. Naturally, increasing the budget deficit and borrowing. That is, it's also in favor of growing money supply and some kind of stimulus.

CONCLUSION:
It doesn't seem obvious for now, and probably will play out in a longer term, in perspective of 1-2 years, and if everything will keep going in this way, but upside tendency on EUR will change. The US is turning to financial stimulus once again, to support consumption and financial markets, which also will lead to higher inflationary pressure. The Fed definitely will have problems to satisfy Trump ambitions on low rates in a such circumstance, which means that overall rate policy probably will be skewed "flat to upward". Meantime, EU is coming to recession with anemic GDP growth and coming price jump in fertilizers, food and energy. Industrial sector is loosing the market share, loosing to Chinese companies. Social burden remains high. True, EU government plans militarization with huge budget, but it is spread in time and distributed among multiple countries. This could have weak supportive effect in long-term perspective. Cost of debt is constantly raising as in EU as in UK. Sentiment remains depressed. Trump intends to put 25% tariffs on EU automakers now. So, the suffocation of EU economy is coming from all sides. Of course, there are a lot of other factors around, just enough to recall coming US elections in November. But we're speaking about economical components.

At the same time, in short-term perspective, EU could get faster inflationary impact (as it is already getting), which could lauch hiking policy earlier than in the US and on a short-term distance EUR has all chances to outperform the dollar, in 2026 and maybe early 2027. As rate hike is already discussed for June. From this point of view, our view that EUR could try to return back to ~ 1.22 area by the end of the year remains intact. The new risk factor is a big interest rates expectations volatility. Rate policy across the globe now stands in changing mode where the new balances and new cycle direction is not set. Which means that even with the same direction, EUR could start forming far wider swings.

TECHNICALS

MONTHLY

Monthly picture barely has changed. Nominal trend is bearish but we have valid directional pattern - bullish grabber. Besides, the price action shows fake flag breakout which could be treated as a "bears' trap" from classical analysis point of view. Situation is rapidly changing. On April we haven't got a new grabber as market closed below MACDP. May is just started making no impact yet. Thus, until market stands above ~1.14 lows this context remains valid:
eur_m_04_05_26.webp


WEEKLY

Here situation is also barely changed. Market mostly stands indecision. After grabber has been formed - two weeks we stand in a tight range with no impact on the picture. It means that pattern is still valid and it suggests bearish continuation. Still, the risk factor has appeared on DXY. It shows very deep retracement on monthly chart, so that the grabber almost erased. Second, on weekly chart we have two opposite grabbers. Because of this we can't rely on this pattern totally and be selective in setups that we get on daily and intraday charts:
eur_w_04_05_26.webp


DAILY

Daily setup has worked accurately with the plan. With the only difference that we suggested a bit smaller upside continuation after reversal bar. EUR holds bearish trend and now we have great "Shooting Star" pattern on top as well:
eur_d_04_05_26.webp


INTRADAY

It seems that on Monday it will be a very responsible moment. Overall price shape on 4H chart of widening triangle is not typical for H&S pattern and mostly has bullish signs. Since we had downside butterfly to 1.1650 - reverse H&S is not excluded here, despite that daily/weekly context is bearish. We could get the clarity only around 1.1675 area, where the right arm should stand. If market break it down - everything is OK with bearish scenario if not - reversal is possible:
eur_4h_04_05_26.webp


Since we still have some room until 1.1675 for bears it will be better to take position at some upward pullback, say 1.1750 level. In this case around 1.1675 you position will be safe. Here, on 1H chart we could get smaller direct H&S that particularly could lead market down to this level. For long entry it would be better to not do anything until 1.1675 level will be reached. Then watch on reaction.
eur_1h_04_05_26.webp
 
Last edited:
Morning Everybody,

So, I'm totally happy with the EUR performance now. It goes accurately with the plan. First is, on daily chart it has dropped, keeping bearish context intact due to oil prices surge and some escalation on M. East:
eur_d_05_05_26.webp


Our 1st pattern has been accurately completed and market comes precisely to 1.1675 area:
eur_1h_05_05_26.webp


Now we're turning to the 2nd one - possible reverse H&S on 4H chart. True, it goes against the context. But for excuse we could say that it is very small cash risk with this possible attempt. Bulls stand at the vital point. They have to either turn market up or fail. If market will keep dropping we will get solid downside continuation, which might be the next stage of weekly bearish grabber saga:
eur_4h_05_05_26.webp


It is not necessary to take the long trade here. It has higher risk than we usually take. But I still decide to share it with you, maybe it fits to somebody...
 
Welcome Back guys,

So... we've got the upside bounce that we discussed yesterday. Not without an external assist from D. Trump who stopped Freedom operation in the Strait. But still... At the same time it means that reaction might be short-term. Overall context remains bearish for EUR. And don't forget about weekly bearish grabber...
eur_d_06_05_26.webp


On 4H chart the picture looks a bit messy. To bring more progress, bulls should keep pushing EUR higher to get at least upside AB=CD, or upside butterfly. While bears have to watch what will happen in nearest hours because EUR stands at resistance. And downside butterfly is also possible:
eur_4h_06_05_26.webp


And here is most interesting thing comes on stage - cross market analysis. We have bullish grabbers on DXY daily chart. Right at the bottom of the right arm of H&S pattern. It means that bearish scenario is not off the table yet.

On 1H chart market is completing XOP now around 1.1740 resistance area.
eur_1h_06_05_26.webp


Since this is the major 5/8 pullback already - it is good point for mid term possession with the weekly grabber. But we have to be sure that market is turning down here - wait for the patterns.

For the bulls it makes sense to wait for the pullback. Taking the new position around Agreement resistance is not the best idea. Those who have taken longs yesterday - think about partial profit taking and moving stops at b/e.
 
Morning everybody,

So, Bulls were able to keep control over situation recently and triggered upside action to complete intraday AB-CD. But this is only the beginning of the story. Here, on EUR we do not have any grabbers, but we do have them on DXY. And market right now stands at very important "Decision making point". In fact, this is the last area where bears keep control. Slightly higher and acceleration will start:
eur_d_07_05_26.webp


Because on DXY weekly chart we have not only similar to EUR grabber, but also the opposite one. And if dollar will not hold current lows (and EUR current highs), the H&S pattern that we have here starts failing. Which automatically will lead price above 1.1850 and DXY under 95:
eur_4h_07_05_26.webp


But it also gives some advantages, particularly for bears. Since, this is the last area, it is possible to take position with most near standing stop order. It is my type of "culmination point". The most easy way to do this - is to use upside bounce from potential B&B "Buy" trade here, on 1H chart:
eur_1h_07_05_26.webp


I suggest that it should be back at least to 1.1770-1.1775 area. But stop has to be placed above 1.1810-1.1815 at least, because market has not quite completed AB=CD on 4H chart.

For the bulls the task is opposite. Upside breakout will open way to 1.1850+ and in this case we will start watching for entry chances.
 
Morning guys,

So, EUR is proving that bearish context stands intact. Our bearish scenario has worked like in the book. On daily chart trend remains bearish. We haven't got any grabbers, but DXY has got another one yesterday. Until these grabbers are valid - bearish scenario on EUR remains intact (as well as DXY H&S pattern):

eur_d_08_05_26.webp


On 4H as we said - 1.1775 is a vital bearish area. They have to either push price down or fail. So, they did it. Context holds:
eur_4h_08_05_26.webp


Even more. Both our 1H patterns worked great - upside B&B "Buy" and following short entry at 5/8 resistance area. Now we've got "222" Buy" here... and coming NFP. We consider no longs until bearish context remains. For a new short entry I would consider 1.1750-1.1755 K-resistance area. This is minimal "222" upside target.
eur_1h_08_05_26.webp
 
Back
Top