Gold GOLD PRO WEEKLY, August 31 - 04, 2026

Sive Morten

Special Consultant to the FPA
Messages
22,093
FUNDAMENTALS

Gold has become the victim of recent K. Warsh statement in Wyoming, as well as other markets. But this is only at the first glance. In fact, this is just surface reaction triggered by news and emotions. It doesn't change ongoing processes that stand undercover. And this explains why gold has turned up recently. It is something starts burning in the US finances. J. Powell attempt to keep rates below real inflation and real rates negative doesn't help to resolve the problem of debt and deficit. Despite that statistics on inflation is strongly distorted. This problem relates not only to the US but almost to all G7 countries - UK, Japan, France, Italy etc. Month by month statements from the Fed's Head and S. Bessent are just minor episodes that trigger short-term emotional speculative reactions. It's top of the iceberg. The real questions that markets are becoming concern with - how the US will resolve these problems now.

MARKET OVERVIEW

Gold slid the most since July as Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh’s pledge to fight inflation bolstered bets that the US central bank will raise interest rates this year, a headwind for the precious metal. In his first speech since becoming chairman of the central bank in May, Warsh reiterated that policymakers will return inflation to their 2% goal, which he said is a firm and fixed target. The dollar pushed higher on his comments, sending bullion lower by as much as 2.9%. The Fed chief also confirmed that “short-term interest rates are the predominant tool to achieve the dual mandate.”
“Unconventional policies to spur economic activity may suit genuine crises but should otherwise be used sparingly, if at all,” he said at the Fed’s annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, on Friday.
“The market interpreted this as meaning that the US central bank is more likely to pull the trigger on higher policy rates in September and December, a significant shift from expectations prior to Mr. Warsh’s speech,” said Bart Melek, global head of commodity strategy at TD Securities.

Selling by trend-following commodity trading advisers helped accelerate gold’s tumble, according to traders. The Fed’s firm restatement of its commitment to price stability, and its belief that monetary policy remains the most effective tool for achieving that goal, means that debasement-trade narratives will likely be tuned out for now, according to Melek.

Bullion has staged a powerful comeback in recent weeks, with prices surging after the US Treasury’s surprise liquidity injection last week drove yields and the dollar lower. The intervention to curb borrowing costs also revived concerns that US policy could erode confidence in the dollar and drive investors toward alternatives. Melek expects gold to give up some of its recent gains, falling toward the lower end of the recent $4,200 to $4,700 trading range by the end of the year.
“Higher rates at the front end of the curve should offset any improvement in financial conditions stemming from Treasury Department liquidity operations on the long end of the curve,” he said.

Traders added to bets on a September rate hike after Warsh said the Fed will "have work to do" if policymakers are not confident that underlying ‌inflation ⁠is returning to its 2% target, marking the closest he has come to acknowledging interest rate hikes may be needed to ease price pressures. Traders now see a 58% chance of a U.S. rate hike in September, compared with 36% before Warsh's comments, and an 89% chance of ⁠a December increase, according to the CME FedWatch tool.

US economic data this week showed that inflation remained well above the Fed’s target, raising prospects for a rate hike, which is typically a headwind for the non-yielding precious metal. The U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, which the Fed uses to set its target, increased 3.7% in the 12 months through July, unchanged from June.
"Gold is getting slapped hard as Chair Warsh affirms that inflation isn't meaningfully slowing and the Fed has 'work to do.' While it may once again be 'speak loudly and carry a short stick' this will make the market price the September meeting as a coin flip," independent analyst Tai Wong said.

Investors are no longer choosing between gold and Bitcoin as hedges against fiscal anxiety. They’re buying both. Exchange-traded funds tracking the assets attracted a record $7 billion over the past five trading days, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, putting some of the biggest gold and Bitcoin vehicles alongside the stock-market giants at the top of the ETF flow rankings.

Nearly $3.4 billion poured into the State Street Investment Management’s SPDR Gold Shares, while BlackRock Inc.’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF took in $1.5 billion. Both cracked the top 10 US ETFs by inflows for the week, with GLD trailing only a handful of funds including the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Now the two versions of the scarcity trade are moving together again, propelled by renewed anxiety over US borrowing, the dollar and efforts to contain long-term yields. Highlighting the recent advance, hedge funds’ net-long position in gold for the week ended Aug. 18 was the highest this year, according to the latest data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Gold-backed ETFs also attracted inflows of 46.7 metric tons ($6.4 ‌billion) ⁠last week, which was their largest weekly demand in 10 months, according to the World Gold Council, with North American and Europe-listed funds leading the inflows.
“It appears that the 40-year era of declining interest rates has come to an end, exposing governments to mounting debt-servicing costs as sovereign debt levels reach unprecedented highs,” Gautam Chhugani, senior analyst of global digital assets at Bernstein, wrote in a note. “Investors will potentially benefit from owning scarce assets such as Bitcoin that cannot be easily created/diluted.”

In a sign of renewed momentum, investors have rushed to bet on further price gains using call options. Total call open interest on SPDR Gold Shares, the largest gold-backed ETF, has surged in recent weeks to reach the highest level since March. The large volume of outstanding options will likely amplify volatility going forward, analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc wrote in a note Friday, as dealers are forced to respond to prices moves by buying or selling the underlying ETF in order to hedge their exposure.
1788069297694.webp


A portfolio manager at Fidelity International Ltd. has doubled his fund’s gold holdings over the past three weeks, citing increasing uncertainty over US Federal Reserve policy as a catalyst. After raising the proportion of bullion in the fund to a self-imposed limit of 5%, George Efstathopoulos said he would consider lifting this ceiling should the safe-haven status of the US dollar continue its decline. He began his recent accumulation after the investor retreat from long-dated Treasury bonds that followed the Fed’s July meeting.
“My translation of that is the lack of Fed credibility and more policy uncertainty,” Efstathopoulos said in an interview on Monday. The Treasury’s unexpected ramp-up in buybacks of long-dated bonds appeared to be an attempt “to manipulate the yields, rather than dealing with the source of why yields are moving higher,” Efstathopoulos said. “Gold now is less focused on yields rising, but why yields are rising.”

The portfolio manager — who sold gold earlier this year, when the metal embarked on its biggest slide in four decades — funded his latest bullion purchases with high-yield bonds, including gilts, along with some cash. He said the underlying factors that drove gold to a record high in late January remained intact, including central bank purchases.
"Gold's price action up to today's data was just some profit taking ... PCE data came in largely in line with expectations, so we're consolidating within yesterday's range at this point," said Peter Grant, vice president and senior metals strategist at Zaner Metals. "I think the uptrend in gold is beginning to ⁠reassert itself. So I do see potential back above $5,000 this year," Grant said, adding that there is potential for gold to reach new all-time highs by the second quarter of 2027.

Elsewhere, China's net gold imports via Hong Kong in July rose about 11% from a month ⁠earlier, data showed on Tuesday, supported by an uptick in investment demand.

In December, when bullion prices sat close to where they are now, gold exchange-traded funds accounted for just 0.17% of private US financial portfolios, according to a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analysis — six basis points lower than a peak in 2012. The bank estimated that each bout of buying that increases gold’s share of US portfolios by 0.01% would lift prices by about 1.4%.
Illustrating the market’s sensitivity to even a modest shift away from US assets, JPMorgan Chase & Co estimated in May 2025 that moving just 0.5% of foreign investors’ US asset holdings into gold — then equivalent to roughly $70 billion a year — could lift prices by about 18% annually under market conditions prevailing at the time.

MARKET COMMENTS

Just as an illustration to recent events - the difference between open interest in call options and put options on gold ETFs this week reached approximately 2.4 million contracts, the highest level since February. This gap has increased by one million contracts since Japan's intervention to support the yen three weeks ago, and the pace of growth has accelerated since the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly doubled its planned purchases of long-term government bonds last Wednesday. Today's figures are more than three times the average for 2021-2024, which is 0.8 million contracts.
1788070841241.webp

Goldman analysts note that expectations of further interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve have weakened following the July employment and inflation data. This supports inflows into speculative positions and ETFs. ️ As a result, the bank sees a "significant risk of growth" above its base forecast of $4,900/oz by the end of 2026. If current demand for options and inflows into ETFs continue, the price could rise significantly.
1788070912261.webp

Goldman traders are seeing a strong influx of clients into gold: digital options with a 3-6 month term are being purchased with targets of $4,800–5,500. Positions are not yet overheated, and Chinese demand remains high. A separate surge in interest in silver is noted:** large clients are buying 3-month options with a strike price of $90/oz, anticipating a shift in retail demand from expensive gold.

Gold prices surged sharply after the U.S. Treasury announced a program to buy long-term bonds ("quasi-twist" by Bessen), but the actual breakthrough began earlier, driven by aggressive purchases from China, central banks, and ETFs. In June, China purchased over 40 tons of gold on the London over-the-counter (OTC) market, making it the second-largest monthly purchase since the beginning of 2025. This is 167% more than the 15 tons officially reported by the People's Bank of China for June.

This follows a purchase of 48 tons on the OTC market in May, which was 380% higher than the 10 tons officially reported by the central bank. Meanwhile, in July, the People's Bank of China officially added another 20 tons of gold, making it the largest monthly purchase since October 2023. Since the beginning of the year, China has officially increased its gold reserves by 60 tons, bringing the total to a record 2366 tons. ️Therefore, China purchased over 88 tons of gold on the OTC market in May and June alone, which exceeds the officially reported amount for the entire year.

1788071262393.webp


Gold at $10,000 per ounce seems absurd, but only as long as we assume the market is buying the metal. In reality, it reflects an overvaluation of trust in government promises.

According to the latest available report from BofA/EPFR, gold funds received $6.3 billion in inflows last week – the highest since January. This is a broader indicator than just physically-backed ETFs. According to data from the World Gold Council, these ETFs received $3 billion in inflows in July, and their holdings increased to 4,068 tons. However, they are still below the February record of 4,176 tons.

The most interesting thing is not the inflow itself. Gold has returned to around $4,650 after falling below $4,000, even though real interest rates remain high. This means that the buyer is now hedging not only against a decline in the Fed's interest rate, but also against long-term government debt, budget deficits, sanctions, and the possibility that bonds will cease to function as a safe haven during a stock market crash.

Central banks bought 289 tons in the second quarter. In a recent survey, 89% of reserve managers expect further growth in global gold reserves, 45% expect growth in their own central bank's reserves, and 74% expect a decrease in the share of the dollar in global reserves over the next five years. Now let's calculate without alchemy. The World Gold Council estimates the global volume of financial assets at approximately $320 trillion. Private investors hold around $9 trillion in bars, coins, ETFs, and over-the-counter gold – only 3% of this pie. If the amount of investment gold and the overall size of the market do not change significantly, a price of $10,000 would increase gold's share to approximately 6-7%. A price of $15,000 would correspond to a share of around 9-10%. Forty years ago, this share was around 14%.

In other words, $10,000-$15,000 is not a baseline forecast or a magic number. This is a scenario in which gold returns from being a decorative element in a portfolio to becoming one of the main financial assets. For this to happen, several things must coincide. Long-term government bonds must cease to protect against crises because they themselves become a source of those crises. Governments must respond with financial repression, debt buybacks, or restrictions on yields. Central banks must continue to convert part of their foreign exchange reserves into physical metal. Private funds must increase their gold holdings from the current 3% to at least 6-10%.

Supply will not respond quickly. There are almost 220,000 tons of gold above ground, but new production only increases this supply by about 1.8% per year. A high price will increase the recycling of old gold and reduce some of the demand for jewelry. This is the main constraint. But a mine cannot be turned on with the press of a button, and the owner of a gold bar is not obligated to sell it just because the price has become attractive. And such a move does not require tens of trillions of dollars in liquid assets. The price is set by a marginal transaction, after which the entire existing supply is re-evaluated. We have discussed this last week - Gold has almost reached $5,600 without classic QE. Stocks have soared on the AI hype without classic QE. Financial assets do not necessarily need a printing press. They need a new buyer and a reason to believe that tomorrow the asset will be worth more than today's money.

The scenario will break down if the United States stabilizes its budget, the dollar strengthens, real interest rates remain high, and central banks and ETFs return to selling. In the second quarter, ETFs already showed how quickly demand can disappear when everyone suddenly needs dollar liquidity.

But if stocks and long-term bonds start to fall at the same time, gold will cease to be just a hedge against a crisis. It will become a hedge against the very entity that provides the hedge. Gold at $15,000 is not a story about how a bar has become more useful. It is a story about how much cheaper promises have become, for which it is being sold.

Gold can potentially replace the safe haven function. However, it's almost impossible to use gold bars to pay for oil, settle dollar-denominated debts, or conduct currency interventions. The trend is clear. Over the past four years, central banks have been buying an average of around 1,000 tons of gold per year, compared to 500 tons in the previous decade. In a recent survey, 74% of reserve managers expect a decline in the dollar's share in global reserves over the next five years.

Researchers at the Federal Reserve have already noted that the unique value of access to dollar liquidity remains. However, the previous advantage of holding long-term U.S. Treasury bonds has significantly diminished, and even after hedging against currency risk, it has become negative. In other words, the world still needs U.S. currency, but it is becoming increasingly reluctant to hold U.S. debt.

Trump is taking advantage of this temporary window. As long as the dollar remains the currency of trade, credit, and settlement, the White House and Congress continue to run large budget deficits. If a country issues debt faster than the world wants to accumulate it, yields rise. If the Federal Reserve tries to hold down yields, the currency is devalued. If the dollar weakens, imported inflation returns home. This privilege does not eliminate the need for accounting; it simply allows the bill to be passed on to others for a longer period. We have already written that the U.S. does not have a problem repaying its debt; the problem is repaying it in dollars of the same value.

Tariffs, sanctions, energy pressure, and attempts to attract capital and factories to the U.S. are all part of a single strategy. If the benefits of the reserve currency status are gradually diminishing, it is necessary to ensure that competitors weaken faster. The U.S. may lose some of its absolute advantage while maintaining its relative advantage.

Therefore, countries are acting cautiously. They do not want to quarrel with Washington and cannot abandon the dollar while their trade, banks, and exchange rates depend on dollar liquidity. Instead of a dramatic exit, they are quietly diversifying their reserves. They keep some dollars for transactions and emergencies, while buying gold for the future.

Trump is not so much protecting the reserve status as taking advantage of it before it disappears. The dollar will likely remain the language of global trade for a long time. The question is whether U.S. Treasury bonds will continue to serve as its safe haven.

Meantime, problems are not disappeared showing that this window is narrowing. The debt has officially exceeded $40 trillion. $10 trillion needs to be refinanced annually, and another approximately $2 trillion needs to be borrowed to cover the deficit. The population has practically stopped generating savings: the savings rate is at its lowest level since the 2000s (0.65 trillion per year and 2.7%), while real cash savings are close to zero. Foreigners are also not particularly eager to buy long-term debt. At the same time, of the $2.43 trillion increase in debt over the past year, only $0.57 trillion is due to an increase in debt with a maturity of more than 5 years - less than 1/4. No matter how much Trump and Bessent talk about how they will reduce debt through economic growth, the chances of this happening are minimal.

If Bessent fails to push the yield on 30-year bonds below 5%, as they say, it will trigger a dollar slump and a shift towards short positions in risk, leverage in areas such as large AI companies and private lending [i.e. Shadow Banking], and cyclical assets such as the financial sector, ahead of the midterm elections. Risk is accumulating day by day. In the short term, a crash always looks like an accident. In the long term, it is almost inevitable.

The proportion of non-accrual loans among the 20 largest publicly traded BDCs (Business Development Companies) has risen to a median of 2.8% – the highest level since 2017. Analysts at Fitch Ratings warned last week that the number of private credit defaults reached a new record in July. David Golub, co-CEO of the private investment firm Golub Capital, told investors earlier this month about a "rise in credit stress," as the industry faces an increase in defaults and troubled loans.
"We are in a credit cycle," Golub said. "Others have been denying it for some time. I think there are fewer denials now."

1788091542582.webp
 
China is not simply selling Treasury bonds. It is showing other countries how to gradually exit the American financial system without declaring war on it. In June, China's holdings of U.S. government debt fell to $633.4 billion, the lowest level since 2008. That's a decrease of $98 billion in a year. At the same time, the People's Bank of China continues to buy gold. In July, it added about 20 tons, bringing its official reserves to approximately 2,378 tons. Treasury bonds are a promise from the American government. Gold is an asset with no issuer, sanctioning committee, or maturity date. Especially if the bar is kept at home.

Who might be next? The first candidate is India. Its investments in Treasury bonds fell from $227.4 billion to $186.4 billion in a year, a decrease of about 18%. At the same time, the Reserve Bank of India holds 880.5 tons of gold worth nearly $109 billion. India is not as deeply integrated into the American system as Japan, it pursues an independent foreign policy, and has long been increasing the role of gold in its reserves, although it can't abandon dollar totally.

The second candidate is Brazil. Its holdings of Treasury bonds fell from $215.4 billion to $168.4 billion in a year, a decrease of almost 22%. The share of gold in its reserves increased from 3.55% to 7.19% in 2025, while the share of the dollar fell to a historic low of 72%. This is no longer a random currency intervention, but a conscious restructuring of the portfolio.

The most important figure is not Chinese at all. Total foreign investments in Treasury bonds increased by 2.3% in a year, to $9.299 trillion. So, the U.S. still has buyers.
But investments by official foreign institutions - central banks and governments - fell by about $114 billion. Reserve managers are gradually leaving. They are being replaced by private funds, banks, and financial centers that like the returns. The difference is fundamental.

Therefore, the main threat to the U.S. is not a massive sale of the remaining $633 billion in Chinese Treasury bonds. That would also hurt China. It is more dangerous if 20 central banks annually transfer $5-10 billion from U.S. debt to gold, euros, yuan, and real assets. There will be no grand finale to the dollar. The U.S. Treasury will simply have to sell debt more often not to a politically loyal reserve manager, but to a buyer who asks the price each time. 45% of central banks surveyed already expect to increase their own gold reserves in the next year. 74% expect a decrease in the share of the dollar in global reserves over the next 5 years.

China is not blowing up the dollar system. It is showing other countries how to gradually exit it without causing an explosion. De-dollarization will not look like a revolution. It will look like 20 lines in an Excel spreadsheet, each of which shows that Treasury bonds have become a little less, and gold a little more.

The US is trying to strike back. "D-day" announced by S. Bessent is not about Iran, but rather a pretext for enacting legislation that will dismantle the old financial system. Bessent has articulated this threat broadly. Any organization that helps Iran launder money or evade sanctions risks being excluded from the dollar-based system. It is about the U.S. Treasury Department's right to decide who has access to the global payment system. This is the reverse side of medal, speaking about freezing assets of some State. Looks differently but effect is the same, just with the different warp.

The dollar system exists in a physical form. Foreign banks need correspondent accounts in the U.S. FinCEN can prohibit American banks from providing these services. In February, this procedure was already initiated against the Swiss bank MBaer for operations related to Iran and Russia. This leads to a conspiracy theory. Iran provides the perfect legal basis to strike at a vulnerable bank within the old transnational network. Formally, it is for sanctions violations. In reality, it is to redistribute influence, clients, and payment routes. This mechanism is possible, but there is no evidence of a plan yet.

The old financial globalization was built on the balance sheets of international banks. They created offshore dollar credit and processed payments through a network of correspondent accounts across national borders. The new model looks different. The dollar remains global. But licenses, reserves, restrictions, and digital wallets are tied to U.S. jurisdiction. The globalization of the dollar is preserved. The globalization of banks is ending.

The Trumpist project is trying to stabilize certain fronts in order to open up others, and to shift the global system from a regime of general rules to a regime of personal permits. Access to the market, the dollar, technology, and security becomes not a right, but the subject of a bilateral deal. In general, Trump does not seem to want to destroy the dollar. He wants to destroy the idea that anyone other than the United States can control the dollar system.

Trump wants to use dollar privilege as long as possible and by all way to postpone its final. Now, the news. CIA Director John Ratcliffe flew to Moscow. The major topic is the EU. For Trumpist America, a unified Brussels is an expensive burden, a regulatory competitor, and a pillar of the old Atlanticist project. Washington is better off with national capitals that pay for their own defense, separately buy American LNG and weapons, and separately negotiate tariffs. A Brussels under control would also suit it.

Russia also benefits from not having a single anti-Russian front, but from a Europe of national states, where each capital again considers its own price for energy, sanctions, and trade. The reasons are different. The direction is the same - weakening the autonomy of the supranational Brussels and returning to bilateral deals.

Russia is neither a friend nor a metaphysical enemy to the Trumpists. It is a separate center of power that is better to stabilize than to push it completely towards China. And the result of the new American policy could be a division of Europe - not in terms of territory, but in terms of functions, markets, and influence. But this is not a secret Russian-American alliance against Europe. Allies would have to share the profits. Here, everyone simply takes their share of the weakened structure.

Russia and the United States are not on the same side. They have simply begun to negotiate on which areas they will no longer stand in each other's way. And Europe, is one of those areas.

With all these stuff in mind, we see how small looks such an events like the Fed rate change or data report. Yes they do matter, especially for day trading, but the real demand for gold and its long term perspective is backed by absolutely different processes. And this perspective now looks good.

TECHNICALS

MONTHLY

Here Gold stands in classic B&B "Buy" (or momentum trade) shape. It is not at oversold anymore. Here we suggest the AB-CD shape as to the upside on lower timeframes as to the downside at least to YPP around 3830$. Because here we have two different patterns. First is, which a shorter-term - the B&B "Buy" it is based on upside momentum, which pushes market out of the first deep. Its minimal target is 4960$ Fib resistance level. Second is a longer-term, Volatility Breakout (VOB). It suggests at least 0.618 downside extension after B&B will be over. Since YPP has not been reached yet and market stands relatively close - it becomes next logic downside target.
gold_m_31_08_26.webp


WEEKLY

Not without external help, but downside reaction on resistance and Overbought area that we discussed last time is started. It is difficult to see the scale for now, but it seems that upward action also will take AB-CD shape. Trend remains bullish here, so we treat this action as a retracement by far.
gold_w_31_08_26.webp


DAILY

Here context has turned bearish. After Friday collapse Gold has reached strong K-support and trend line area. But it is not at oversold now. It is natural to see the upside bounce here as well, but it is not necessary will be the upside reversal. Weekly Oversold, backed by the Fed comments suggests deeper reaction. So, here is some more extended, compounded action also is quite possible
gold_d_31_08_26.webp


INTRADAY

Here is another support factor - flag consolidation. Now it also starts working like support. So, on Monday we need to see what will happen around. Now we have no signs by far. If acceptable bullish reaction starts appearing, it is possible to take scalp long position around this levels, but better to focus on just minimal upside target, somewhere around 4590-4600$. Because dynamic suggests continuation, so we could get downside AB-CD here as well
gold_4h_31_08_26.webp
 
Last edited:
Morning everybody,

As we said in weekend, as EUR as Gold stand around strong daily K-support area, but since downside momentum is too strong, this might be not enough to start a pullback. So we agreed to watch for patterns.
gold_d_01_09_26.webp


On 4H we see nothing special yet but price could form local grabber. Which hints on small downside continuation:
gold_4h_01_09_26.webp


In fact gold already has completed XOP target and is forming triangle, that hardly could be called as bullish continuation pattern. But triangles very often come infront of butterflies and H&S patterns. And that might be what we want
gold_1h_01_09_26.webp


So, first - control 4H and the grabber. If it will be confirmed, then it better to wait for another downside action. Then watch for butterfly or H&S pattern. Everything has to happen relatively close to XOP lows. Market should not drop too much, otherwise this setup will be cancelled.
 
Morning guys,

Its not occasionally we called to not buy without clear patterns. Because gold market is falling not because of its fundamentals. But because of the fast raising of the US long-term yields. Gold higher sensitivity to this as it generates no interest. Currently it is not effect of K. Warsh speech but effect of the yields that ignore Bessent idea.

As a result gold drops down to 5/8 support level. Overall context remains bearish and we can't consider any bullish trades, at least on daily chart. Besides, here it might be a H&S pattern, very similar to what we see on DXY. In fact we have a "V" shape top. And if you link candle you can see a huge bearish engulfing pattern
gold_d_02_09_26.webp


Usually it has AB-CD shape, so continuation is quite possible, as well as H&S shape on 4H chart.
gold_4h_02_09_26.webp


A few minor trades could be done here still. First is the bounce up to 4440 resistance. Second - B&B "Sell" around the same 4440 level, as it could become downside extension starting point with some big AB-CD

On 1H chart we warned about triangle that is bearish, if it will not become a part of some reversal pattern. So there were no buying options yesterday. Here on the bottom you could consider scalp B&B "Sell" as well. But this trade is just for a few minutes, maybe an hour.
gold_1h_02_09_26.webp
 
Morning everybody,

Gold is pressed harder by high US yields. And once they are started to pullback - gold rebounds. Still, context on daily chart remains bearish, despite that price stands at 5/8 support area. Besides, in current situation NFP plays too big role and tomorrow situation could change.
gold_d_03_09_26.webp


But for now 4440$ resistance has been reached as we suggested and we have potential bearish momentum trade in place. Besides, H&S shape becomes quite evident here. So, around 4440-4460 we will search for bearish signs
gold_4h_03_09_26.webp


On 1H we have the opposite pattern, suggesting action to 4540$ if it works. So, it is not simple to deal now with the gold market.
gold_1h_03_09_26.webp


Depending on your view, for short entry we keep an eye on 4460$, for long entry - 4380-4390$. But no matter what position you consider now - don't take it without a clear 5-15min patterns that you could use for stop placement. Situation is mostly still indefinite with high dependence on NFP numbers.
 
Greetings everybody,

Gold is showing really dramatic action this week under impact of raising US yields. And it is really difficult to deal with it. Despite big drop on daily chart, right down to 5/8 support, upside momentum trade has happened and almost hit the target. Another problem today is NFP and its high value for the Fed decision, which unavoidably leads to high volatility today.
gold_d_04_09_26.webp


On 4H we see that H&S shape is still exist and mostly depends on what will happen on NFP release. Daily target stands at 5/8 resistance around 4538 - very similar to EUR setup
gold_4h_04_09_26.webp


But 1H chart is significantly different. We have same triangle consolidation for immediate upside continuation setup with the 4550$ target and 4420-4450 support area for postponed long entry if the pullback happens first.
gold_1h_04_09_26.webp


Best conservative decision now is to do nothing, wait for NFP release and then make decision in a new market environment. If you want to take part in NFP release you can try to use triangle consolidation as we see signs of bullish dynamic pressure around it (at least for now). But it cares rather high risk mostly because of potential volatility, although nominal cash risk is relatively small.
 
Back
Top