i looked at this anton guy again, and i came to realize more and more how self-serving that interview was, as well as the BBC show. the institute of trading, of which he apparently is the CEO, was opened after the show aired. all great PR. but that's SOP when it comes to business, i guess.
what puzzles me though is that he says that we, retail traders, make the mistake of focusing on only 1 or 2 FX pairs, maybe an additional couple of CFDs and that's it when there 40,000+ tradeable instruments in the market. and therefore we miss giant opportunities, trying to make it rich the slow way and getting burned in the process because we listen to advice given by the brokers (you know, all the simplistic broker sponsored education sites who explain you must sell or buy depending on where the RSI crosses the line, for ex, which is right on the money).
i always kept hearing that prop FX traders focus on becoming experts in only 1 or 2 pairs. so why is this guy saying you should be trading all over the map, especially to noobs?
i mean, there is no way in hell one can be a purely technical trader and juggle 10s of multiple instruments simultaneously in different asset classes on multiple timeframes just on a technical basis. first, you'd need a wall of screens. second, you would need an IQ and multi-tasking ability off the charts. all studies into multi-tasking have shown that humans are very bad at it--the more you throw at someone, their error rate goes up and productivity down in a linear fashion. so no matter how many screens in front of you, probability is now slowly but surely working against you.
probably that's why that institute emphasizes a fundamental approach to trading rather than a technical one.
but what really puzzles me is that his institute gets the students to set up a trading account with SAXO Bank, of all brokers!! it may be great for the total breadth of instruments offered, BUT
1- the Danish tossers are as much a bank in the traditional sense of the word as Dukascopy Bank is, i.e. they are retail broker-dealers trying to give themselves an aura of trustworthiness and credibility by applying the term 'Bank' to their commercial name, as if being a bank is a guarantee that your money is safe!! so totally preposterous. just look at what the Dutch bank ABN AMRO did to their customers who wanted to get their hands on the gold they owned: ABN squarely told them to f#*k off because instead of keeping their customers' gold safe, the gold just vanished!! WTF?!?
2- to make sure i wasn't BSing myself, i spent last night going through the legal docs available on the SAXO site and, lo and behold!, what did i find out? they admit (i'd be really surprised if they would disclose it if the law didn't force them to) SAXO acts as a market maker in the OTC FX and CFDs market, they have a proprietary desk, and plenty of conflict of interest. bottom line, they totally trade against their clients--still!
you should read the fine print: the way it is phrased sent chills down my spine; basically, if you are a retail trader trading an OTC market, it's open season and they will take you down; they even come up with ridiculous 'supporting' arguments such as sometimes due to market conditions, trading needs to be switched to manual because sometimes the computer can't keep up!!! WTF? what kind of computers do they use over there? 1980 era commodore 64s? give me a freakin' break!
god but this makes me so angry.