Forex FOREX PRO WEEKLY, February 28 - 04, 2022

Sive Morten

Special Consultant to the FPA
Messages
18,673
Fundamentals

So, we've got absolutely crazy week, guys, on Thursday I thought that my phone should explode. For the trading process, it's hard to call a positive time. Geopolitical factors make an external impact that increases volatility in times and the trading process becomes really tough. As big events just have happened, we have a chance that within one, maybe two weeks, markets mostly will be driven by financial factors again, that would be nice. From this standpoint we have an important week - J. Powell's speech in Congress on the 2-3rd of March, that I would call as preliminary hearing of the coming rate hike, and NFP release on Friday.

Market overview

The U.S. dollar jumped to its highest level in nearly two years and the Russian rouble plunged to a record low on Thursday after military escalation, as investors fled risk assets and moved toward safe-haven assets. The dollar index rose 0.869% and was on pace for its biggest daily percentage gain since March 2020, when U.S, markets were in the throes of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The greenback reached a high of 97.740 against a basket of major currencies, its highest since June 30, 2020.

The greenback has been subdued recently as tensions in Ukraine have increased and fueled speculation the U.S. Federal Reserve may be less aggressive in tightening policy at its March meeting. Expectations for at least a 50-basis-point interest rate hike have dropped to 7.5% from around 34% a day ago, according to CME's FedWatch Tool.

U.S. Federal Reserve officials on Thursday began taking stock of how the unfolding conflict in Ukraine might influence the economy and their planned shift to tighter monetary policy, with investors and some officials suggesting it could slow but likely not stop a planned round of interest rate increases. Oil and commodity price shocks and a possible blow to global growth and confidence were clear risks, analysts said, and one Fed policymaker said the events of the last 24 hours could weigh on upcoming Fed decisions.

The risks could be as obvious as high oil prices weighing on consumer spending and rising inflation even further, or as unknowable as how Russia might respond to U.S. sanctions.

"Underlying demand is strong. The labor market is tight. Inflation is high and broadening," Barkin said, describing the basic case for rate increases. "But I will say that it is unsettling to hear the news. As always happens you have to start and think through where could this thing go that you might not have forecast originally."

The Fed plans to raise interest rates beginning in March as it battles inflation that has hit multi-decade highs. Fed policy has already been complicated by the unpredictable impact of a once-in-a-century pandemic, and must now account for a likely energy price shock and other uncertainty following Russia's military move into Ukraine.

But the events overnight have dealt the central bank an unexpected new dynamic, an echo of the oil price shocks of the 1970s that were also driven by geopolitical conflict. In that case, it was war and other tension in the Middle East and came at a time when the U.S. economy was far more dependent on imported energy, and U.S. industry far less energy efficient. Still, Fed officials were beginning to think through the implications of an event that had the potential to both slow growth and add to inflation.

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said that with U.S. inflation as high as it is and the labor market strong, the Fed should go ahead with rate hikes even with the uncertainty of military events.

"I really don't see, unless things get materially worse...that this is going to have an effect" on the Fed's decision to start raising rates in March, she said at an event Wednesday in Los Angeles

We think probably now we have reached a tipping point where this is a situation that could start to have impacts on confidence...we know that it's affecting financial markets," said Jennifer McKeown, Head of Global Economics Service at Capital Economics. It is unlikely to derail tightening plans, but "central banks are probably more likely now to be starting to err on the side of caution and worry about the adverse effects on their economy."

The immediate economic risk appears larger for Europe than the United States, with European Central Bank policymakers convening Thursday in a previously scheduled "informal" gathering that may become a crisis meeting. Still, the crisis threatens to delay the resolution of prominent factors that have fanned U.S. inflation higher such as global supply bottlenecks, which could keep price pressures high while denting growth prospects.

1645869522954.png


Beyond the very near term, "the impact of the stagflationary shock is ambiguous and could be net hawkish," Evercore ISI analysts wrote. "Both the adverse sides of the macro distribution move up: the right tail risk of continued excess inflation in the medium term and the left tail risk that efforts to curb this inflation...end up causing a recession."

"In the context of the sizeable disruptions to supply chains and energy prices already, this will...complicate the policy response of central banks," wrote analysts with TD Securities. "The Fed and the U.S. may be removed enough to keep to hiking as planned, though risks shift in terms of 25 (basis point) increments rather than anything more aggressive."

"Given the current environment, I anticipate the Fed is going to become a little bit more cautious," said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda in New York.
"You are also seeing geopolitical tensions are going to keep risk aversion the go-to trade so any rebounds in risk are going to be faded."

As a result, the U.S. dollar dipped on Friday, giving back some of the strong gains from the previous day, as investors gauged the latest round of sanctions on Russia and U.S. inflation data was seen as unlikely to make the Federal Reserve overly aggressive at its next policy meeting.

U.S. economic data showed consumer spending increased more than expected in January even as price pressures mounted, with annual inflation hitting rates last seen four decades ago, although the personal consumption expenditures price index increased 0.6% in January after rising 0.5% in December.

"The revisions to income and spending data show the economy was very resilient to Omicron and to high oil prices. Hopefully, the situation with Russia is short-lived, but even if oil prices stay elevated, the economy should have enough fundamental strength to tolerate high energy prices," said Brian Jacobsen, senior investment strategist at All spring Global Investments in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. The inflation numbers weren’t great, but at least the month-on-month inflation numbers aren’t moving higher," Jacobsen said. "That should take some wind out from under the wings of the most hawkish Fed members."

In the US central bank's latest monetary policy report to Congress, the Fed warned inflation could last longer than anticipated should labor shortages and fast-rising wages continue. Policymakers at the European Central Bank (ECB) said the situation in Ukraine could cause the ECB to slow its exit from stimulus measures. Investors see only a 4% chance the ECB will boost its benchmark interest rate by 10 basis points at its March 10 policy meeting.

European Central Bank policymakers are gathering on Thursday for what may have become a crisis meeting as Russia's invasion of Ukraine threatens to derail economic growth in the eurozone and complicate the ECB's path out of negative interest rates. The ECB's "informal get-together" was aimed at preparing a decision on March 10 on the likely end of the ECB's bond-buying stimulus programme, paving the way for the first-rate hike in more than a decade to tackle surprisingly high inflation.

The situation in Eastern Europe overnight has changed the picture by raising the prospect of higher energy costs, financial turmoil and lower trade for the euro zone, which relies on Russian gas for 40% of its needs.

"In my view it is going to have a short-term inflationary effect – that is prices will increase due to higher energy costs," ECB policymaker Yannis Stournaras told Reuters.
"But in the medium to long term I think that the consequences will be deflationary through adverse trade effects and of course through the rise in energy prices," the Greek central banker added.

Stournaras, among the 'doves' of the ECB's Governing Council who favor an easier monetary policy stance, added the central bank should continue buying bonds at least until the end of the year to cushion the impact of conflict in Ukraine

Even his Austrian peer Robert Holzmann, seen as a 'hawk', said events in Ukraine may delay the ECB's exit from stimulus measures, Bloomberg reported later. Isabel Schnabel, an ECB board member who is also seen as a hawk, said the "shock of war" had clouded the outlook for the economy just as inflation was taking hold in the eurozone and allowing the ECB to withdraw its stimulus measures.

Analysts concurred that the ECB was now likely to slow down the withdrawal of its support measures.

"It will make the ECB more cautious and may delay the decision on tapering bond purchases," said Frederik Ducrozet, a strategist at Pictet.
Daiwa Capital Markets' head of research Chris Scicluna said the crisis would "slow the pace of (ECB policy) normalisation".
ING economist Carsten Brzeski said the ECB may refrain from giving an end date to its Asset Purchase Programme on March 10.

For many investors it's a case now of wait and see what unfolds in the days ahead, such as the extent of sanctions, where energy prices settle and how central banks react. Comments in the last 24 hours suggest major central banks will stick to their plans to tighten monetary policy in the face of inflation running at its highest level in decades.
Fed Governor Christopher Waller on Thursday laid out the case for raising U.S. interest rates by a full percentage point by mid-summer. Some European Central Bank officials have suggested the invasion doesn't fundamentally change the economic outlook. Still, a fresh wave of uncertainty means caution is likely.

The most aggressive rate hike bets baked into markets have been dialled back further, lifting sovereign bond markets. But no doubt, with oil prices shooting above $100 a barrel following the invasion, another upward near-term shock to inflation is likely. European natural gas soared more than 60% at one point on Thursday before settling to close just over 30% higher.

Decoupling Russia: the global economy's new unknown

Western economic sanctions heap a new set of unknowables on a global economy already distorted by the coronavirus pandemic and a decade of ultra-cheap money. The bid to exclude from the trading system whole chunks of the world's 11th largest economy -- and supplier of one-sixth of all commodities -- has no precedent in the globalized age.

Sanctions unveiled so far will hit Russian banks' business in dollars, euros, pounds and yen. U.S. export curbs will restrict Russian access to electronics and computers while European capitals are fine-tuning similar export controls and measures to target the energy and transport sectors.

For now, they won't condemn the Russian economy to anything like isolation: the gas on which Europe depends will keep flowing and Russia's banks will retain access to the SWIFT global bank messaging system. But further punitive measures remain possible, while the chaos of conflict and prospective counter-measures by Moscow make it likely there will be some decoupling of the Russian economy and its huge resources.

"The war, sanctions, and the likelihood of meaningful retaliation by Russia together will likely cause a material global recessionary shock," political risk consultancy Eurasia Group said in a note. "Sanctions on Russian banks and trade will likely cause meaningful disruptions to global trade and financial relationships with far-reaching effects."

Oxford Economics said it now sees global inflation this year at 6.1%, up from 5.4%, citing the impact of sanctions, financial market disruption and higher gas, oil and food prices. While that will add to cost-of-living worries, Oxford reduced its forecast for global output growth by a modest 0.2 points to 3.8% this year and by just 0.1 points to 3.4% in 2023.

That small dose of "stagflation" is a headache for central banks trying to reduce stimulus and return base rates to something like normal after a decade near zero.
But for now, the consensus is that tightening can cautiously go-ahead.

Even without excluding Russian banks from SWIFT, the mere whiff of legal consequences for any Western bank found to have breached sanctions could have a "chilling effect on business", one specialist lawyer told Reuters. The same goes for other financial services.

How sanctions will apply to Russia's vast energy and commodity resources remains opaque. Russia produces 10% of global oil and supplies 40% of Europe's gas. It is the world's largest grains and fertilizers exporter, top palladium and nickel producer, third-largest exporter of coal and of steel, and fifth-largest wood exporter.

"We just don't see the West having enough appetite for sanctioning Russia at a time when inflation is already super high and energy and food prices are both elevated."

Russian Economy Ministry said on Friday it had expected the sanctions pressure faced since Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea to intensify, and that it plans to step up trade and economic ties with Asian countries.

Such a pivot would depend notably on Beijing seeing interest in a China-Russia trading bloc that could emerge as a viable alternative to Western channels.

"It could force companies to have two separate supply chains to serve each one," Jacob Kirkegaard at German Marshall Fund said of a development that would reverse decades of attempts to streamline trade channels for efficiency. Coming after the pandemic-era supply chain problems, that could exacerbate price hikes and goods shortages which are hurting the world economy.

Besides, Russia hasn't announced any sanctions imposed on the EU and the US by far, but they should follow.

Inflation will have the biggest impact on global markets in 2022, traders said, while liquidity was the top daily trading challenge for a sixth year, according to an annual survey of institutional trading clients by JPMorgan published on Wednesday. About 48% of 718 institutional trading clients surveyed at the end of November 2021 highlighted inflation as this year's biggest market mover, displacing the global pandemic, which topped last year's list.

Economic dislocation and the pandemic were the next factors seen as having the biggest impact, each polling at 13%.

The German economy will probably shrink again in the current quarter as a new wave of coronavirus infections stops many people from going to work, the Bundesbank said on Monday, while predicting a rebound in the spring. Europe's largest economy went into reverse in the last three months of 2021 as its large industrial sector was hit by supply snags. These were now easing but the rapid spread of the Omicron variant was affecting services and employment in general.

"Unlike in previous waves of the pandemic it is not just activity in the services sector that is likely affected by containment measures and behavioral changes," Germany's central bank wrote in a monthly report. "Instead, pandemic-related absence from work is likely to dampen economic activity markedly also in other sectors."

The Bundesbank said German industry was providing "a positive impulse" to the economy thanks to easing supply bottlenecks and high demand, setting the stage for a rebound in the spring if the pandemic subsided.

"Heightened volatility on the escalation of the conflict shows markets had not fully priced in the likelihood of deeper conflict," said Mark Haefele, chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management, in a Thursday report.

This war will last, says French President Macron. French President Emmanuel Macron predicted that the war would last and bring with it long-term consequences.
Speaking at France's annual agriculture fair, he said -
"If I can tell you one thing this morning, it is that this war will last.... This crisis will last, this war will last and all the crises that come with it will have lasting consequences." He added that the world must prepare for a 'long war'...

Some investors expect geopolitical tensions to continue plaguing markets, as the implications from the war in Ukraine become clearer.

Kyle Bass, founder and chief investment officer of hedge fund Hayman Capital Management, believes investors still have not factored in all of the possible outcomes that could result from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, including a prolonged conflict that weighs on global growth and sends inflation higher by pushing up commodity prices.

"This is going to get worse before it gets better," he told Reuters in a recent interview. "Asset managers don't have these outcomes in their realm of possibilities."

Bass said investors should own assets that can hold value during inflationary times, such as commodities and real estate. Though Ukraine remains in flux, those in favor of buying on weakness argue that stock declines from past geopolitical events have been short-lived. LPL Financial's study of 37 major geopolitical events since World War Two found that stocks were up an average of 11% one year later, provided a recession does not occur.

BlackRock earlier this week added to its strategic overweight in equities, saying investors may be overestimating how hawkish central banks will need to be in their battle against inflation. JPMorgan's analysts, meanwhile, argued that "initial volatility around rate liftoff didn't last and equities made new all-time highs 2-4 quarters out."

Others, however, are taking a more dour view, as the markets price in Fed tightening in the face of soaring inflation.

"We're bearish," analysts at BofA Global Research wrote in a recent note, saying they believe the "bull era of central bank excess, Wall St inflation, (and) globalization" is ending, to be replaced by a "bear era" of inflation and geopolitical isolationism.

British consumer confidence suffered its biggest month-on-month drop in February since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, as people worried about fast-rising inflation, higher taxes, and interest rates going up, a survey showed on Friday.

The GfK Consumer Confidence Index slumped to -26 from -19 in February to touch its lowest level since January of last year when Britain was under a tight lockdown.

"Fear about the impact of price rises from food to fuel and utilities, increased taxation and interest rate hikes has created a perfect storm of worries that has shaken consumer confidence," Joe Staton, GfK's client strategy director, said. "There's clear anxiety in these findings as many consumers worry about balancing the household books at the end of the month without going further into debt," Staton said. "Slowing consumer spend slows the wheels of the UK economy so this is unwelcome news," he added.

Sentiment about the next 12 months for personal finances and the wider economic situation fell particularly heavily.

COT Report

This week's data hardly shows an adequate picture, in general, we just run out of the EUR. Investors have closed as longs as shorts, although the drop of open interest was insignificant. In general, changes are positive - net long speculative position has increased as bears have closed more positions. Hedgers also have increased exposition against EUR growth.

1645877837780.png


Speculators cut their net long U.S. dollar positions in the latest week, according to calculations by Reuters and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data released on Friday. The value of the net long dollar was $5.80 billion in the week ended Feb. 22, compared with a net long of $6.76 billion the previous week. Another large consensus trade has been long euros where net longs are at six-month highs and rose by $1.2 billion in the latest week, according to CFTC.

To be continued...
 
Last edited:
Next week to watch

Recent events have wide-ranging implications for the economy and financial markets. Oil's spike above $100 a barrel may exacerbate inflation and hurt economic growth. But expect no extra oil from OPEC+ when it meets on Wednesday.

The shift in the growth-inflation equation is a quandary for policymakers, though the Bank of Canada may not blink in delivering an interest rate rise.

But events may help the BoC's Australian counterpart justify its resolutely dovish stance, while U.S. employment and European inflation readings will provide fodder for the Fed and ECB ahead of their March meetings.

#1 NFP Data
March will be a highly consequential month for monetary policy worldwide, and Friday's U.S. non-farm payrolls number will be the last such report the Federal Reserve sees before its March 15-16 meeting. With inflation at 40-year highs, that meeting should enact the first interest rate increase since end-2018, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has signalled. But the jobs data could colour the outlook for Fed policy in the near term.

Reuters surveys predict 381,000 jobs were added in February, while average earnings rose another 5.8% annualised. Numbers well above that might revive expectations of a half-percentage-point rate rise, which have been pared back as the Ukraine crisis has escalated, triggering heavy stock market falls.

Markets are currently pricing in over 160 points of interest rate increases by next February.

1645883007702.png


#2 EU Inflation data

One economist called January's 5.1% euro area inflation print a slap in the face for the European Central Bank. A day later the bank appeared to throw in the towel and concede that a 2022 interest rate hike was possible.

With oil and food prices seen soaring due to the conflict in Ukraine - both it and Russia are major grain producers - it seems unlikely the 5.2% inflation print predicted for February and due on Wednesday will be the peak. German flash inflation, due a day earlier, is also expected at 5.1%.

Elevated oil costs could send European inflation to 5.7% this year, a whole percentage point above the non-conflict scenario, Deutsche Bank estimates. But the corresponding hit to GDP will put the ECB in a tough spot.

1645883019622.png


#3 RBA and Canada rate decisions

Ukraine or not, some central banks can't delay tightening policy. On Wednesday, the Bank of Canada looks all but certain to hike interest rates by 25 basis points, marking its first rate increase in over three years. Economists do not rule out a 50 bps move in March. Inflation is well above the BoC's 2% target and has been above its 1-3% control range for 10 consecutive months. Note Deputy Governor Timothy Lane's recent warning that the BoC would be "nimble" and potentially "forceful" in tackling inflation.

The Ukraine crisis may give the Reserve Bank of Australia, one the world's more dovish central banks, extra reasons to stand pat. While Governor Philip Lowe has been sparring with markets over what happens to rates this year, the RBA's Tuesday meeting was not expected to change its record-low 0.1% rate. Traders reckon an inflation shock will force a rate hike by the third quarter. While Lowe has admitted a move this year is "plausible," he's still pushing for patience.


Conclusion:

There are two major events an oncoming week - J. Powell's testimony in Washington on Thursday and following the NFP report. Now we already see how accent in rhetoric is changing in favor of more dovish Central Banks' reaction, because military conflict could make an impact on economic performance, slow down inflation. So, an aggressive interest rate hike might be not needed. Well, it might be more or less probable for the EU, which has tighter relation with Russia but is hardly applicable to the US which mostly has no significant trade relations with it. Besides, geopolitical tensions hardly calm down inflation as hydrocarbons prices could stay at a high level for a considerable time. And this is even without any sanctions that Russia could impose as well, at least for the very short-term just to scare "partners".
In general, the most tricky thing is the US inflation and whether Fed will be able to control it. If you take a look at the history and the chart of Fed fund rate - you could see that since 80's interest rate was constantly dropping:

1645883059487.png

In the '80s inflation was around the same 18-20% and the problem was resolved by the 1st invasion of Iraq during the Iraq-Kuwait conflict. In fact, the US was stimulating households' consumption and economic growth by making money cheaper all the time. As households in the US always have high loan leverage, every time the rate has been cut - they refinanced the loans and got a bit of "free" money to consume more. And that has lasted since the 1980s. The period of 1990-2000 is a time of robbing the former USSR that has brought the prosperity period to the US.
That's being said, now we have a problem - you can't cut the rate more and stimulate consumption. Even more - now you have to rise it. But what will happen with households' budgets? Right, it becomes difficult to feed the family. Could you withdraw debts? No, because you destroy the banking system. Sounds tricky, right? Tensions with Russia hardly calms down the situation, as gasoline prices in the US already hit the records:

1645883101292.png


Additionally, the US keeps the trade war with China, using artificially created bottlenecks and sabotaging goods delivery, making it more expensive and creating a deficit. This background makes me think about two moments. The first is - 0.25% rate change in March will be like a cake to the elephant. Despite that investors' anticipation of 0.5% rate change is losing pace - 3m US bills rate, that is a good barometer of Fed, has dropped only barely since the military conflict in Ukraine. Besides, it is about 3 weeks until the rate decision, and we get more data, including inflation statistics. Anyway, 25 points will be a dovish decision and short-term reaction probably will be negative for the US dollar.
And the 2nd thing - since inflation has structural roots, not just monetary ones, that could be controlled only by cutting cash supply in the banking system, I suspect that even 2.5% rate, which is now treated as terminal value, is hardly enough to control inflation. Negative signs from economic conditions come earlier than Fed will reach 2.5% rate by the end of 2024. But this is just my personal feeling, I could be wrong. But anyway, in 2022 the US stands closer to hawkish rate policy compares to ECB, especially with the military conflict on the back. It means that despite whether rate change helps to control inflation or not - at the first stage it should support the dollar, especially if investors will see that after the initial rate change inflation is not decreasing. The first doubts and suspicions could appear later, closer to the fall or winter of 2022.

Finally, on geopolitical tensions, guys. I do not want to talk too much about it and just express the two most common positions. The first one tells that Putin has swallowed Ukraine's bait that the West has set. Now Russia should meet with deteriorating domestic political and financial stability because of sanctions and war casualties. This potentially should make it easier to change the regime and use Russia to confront China. Besides, the conflict's by-product is temporal hurting of another US rival - Europe, supporting dollar value and dollar assets and increasing cash flows in the US.
The second opinion is that operation in Ukraine was a bit surprising because of scale and its spreading over the whole country but not only in the eastern regions, the same as recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk republics. Both events have happened relatively fast. This was not a total surprise but it was not among the first most probable points that potentially could have happened. As a result - J. Biden is losing control over Ukraine and could impose only sanctions that are not hard enough by far. This could lead to domestic political struggle intensity ahead of Senate elections in November. Which is a kind of political defeat. Besides, in the foreign arena, this is a sign of weakness and harm to the US reputation as well.
I do not know which one is correct, the current situation relates to both. I would say that we should keep an eye on two points. If NATO intrudes the conflict or any NATO member country separately (say Poland, or Baltic countries) and/or Russia could set the law and the order in Ukraine relatively fast - these are the signs of the 2nd version.

Technicals

Monthly

Monthly chart brings nothing new by far. We see that volatility is rising but price mostly stands in the same trading range. EUR can't take off the COP target keeping major bearish technical moments here valid - the trend is bearish here, downside CD leg speed is faster than AB, which doesn't let us count on upside reversal. Besides EUR has broken all meaningful support levels here and YPP of 2021.

The next downside long-term destination point is around the 1.09-1.10 area - the combination of YPS1 and the trend line. Which is actually matches UBS's view of 1.10 level by the end of this year, mentioned previously. The market is not oversold.

eur_m_28_02_22.png


Weekly

The weekly trend is still bullish. EUR was able to show a solid pullback on Friday, but currently, it is difficult to say whether this is the first step of more extended action or just short-covering by speculators. Now it has features of W&R of 1.11 lows, but as the drop was strong, we can't rely neither on engulfing pattern nor on DRPO "Buy" that has been formed earlier. The only positive sign that price was able to hold above the lows.
eur_w_28_02_22.png


Daily

Another technical reason for the pullback is daily oversold. To consider long position here we probably need to get more confidence - bullish trend and intraday reversal patterns and signs of breaking the bearish tendency:
eur_d_28_02_22.png


Intraday

Thus, first, we could keep an eye on the 4H resistance area and 1H "222" Sell pattern, which also could be used for scalp short trading setup.
eur_4h_28_02_22.png


Upward breakout and moving to the "C" point top, suggesting of reverse H&S pattern, could make the background for the long entry, at least in the short term.
 
Morning guys,

So, an interesting combination we have on EUR right now - the riddle with weekly DXY bearish grabber remains, just because EUR shows no bullish signs by far. It's worth mentioning that all other markets agree with a potentially bearish DXY pattern - gold is rising, US interest rates are falling, CAD shows bearish grabbers as well.

Maybe the situation will change, but as we've said in the weekly report - EUR now is a specific currency as war stands nearby. And this factor distorts normal action that EUR could show. It is fine if you do not want to go short with it, but, for long entry wait, at least for closing of the gap on 1H chart:
eur_1h_01_03_22.png


And action above 1.13 area at least. In this case, it might be treated as some return of bullish sentiment here.
Meantime, I'm more worried about forming a wide triangle pattern, which is theoretically bearish. Besides, EUR was not able to break K-area that we've set as minimum bullish conditions. It makes me keep valid next XOP target around 1.1050 still:
eur_d_01_03_22.png



P.S. if you would like to know where all money of Russian oligarchs - take a look at Bitcoin today and our latest analysis :)
 
Morning guys,

So, our suggestions yesterday were more or less correct. EUR forgets about upward action and keeps going lower. As we see gold and dollar are rising together - this is a clear indication of geopolitical nervousness on the market. It is understandable as after military shock now the financial rebalancing is starting. There are a lot of mutual companies between the EU and Russia and now they start breaking relationships, closing export/import, etc. All this stuff makes an impact on companies' performance and pushes stock indexes and currency down. In general, everything goes with our plan - geopolitical problems become a long-lasting factor, the dollar is rising and disguising domestic fiscal problems by external safe-haven demand. That should last for a few months.

On EUR we have 1.1050 target that probably should be reached within 1-2 sessions.

eur_4h_02_03_22.png


Let's watch today for CPI numbers in Europe, J. Powell speech and ADP report.
 
Morning everybody,

J. Powell has made a relatively hawkish statement recently. He clarifies that the March hike is expected for 25 points but he doesn't exclude chances on more aggressive rate hiking later if needed. This returns everything back to its own - interest rates jump, dollar straightens as well. Thus, on EUR we have nothing new.

That's why lets' take a look at GBP, where we see an excellent setup to consider. Take a look at the weekly chart - we could get a potentially bullish grabber with an upside target around 1.37 area.
GBP_w_03_03_22.png


On daily chart we have nice "222" Buy pattern:

GBP_d_03_03_22.png


while on the intraday charts no clear bullish performance yet, but we have the divergences, and theoretically we could try to treat price action as Double Bottom on the hourly chart:
GBP_1h_03_03_22.png
 
Morning guys,

So, EUR has passed through our XOP target without any response.
eur_4h_04_03_22.png


Daily chart starts showing the signs of trending market. EUR usually "creeps" with the oversold, showing very small intraday pullbacks. It is not surprising in current economic situation. We expect that it is going to the next our target of 1.085-1.09:
eur_m_04_03_22.png


In the current situation, NFP is becoming a secondary factor for the EU as it is overcome by inner economic problems. Only if the USD drops a bit, this could let EUR to show some bounce.
 
Thanks for all your continuing postings.
Regarding yesterday on GBP, does the action mean that we did not get the bullish grabber and the upside targets of 1.37 has been erased, or ...?
 
Thanks for all your continuing postings.
Regarding yesterday on GBP, does the action mean that we did not get the bullish grabber and the upside targets of 1.37 has been erased, or ...?
Not yet. We need to see the close price for the week.
 
Back
Top