Hello Mr Morten
thanks for the Great analysis as usual. I see in some of your Tech Analysis for some while now that incumbing factors as Some kind of report like non farm for example does not refect on your analysis in a major way in the long run of course. I am baffled how it is so in the long run meaning, yes they have an immediate reponse when report or factor is out but then everything goes back to as the way it should be, according to your analysis.
I also follow Mr Liu and for him those influential factors seems to the the cathalist basis for trading in one direction or the other. Meaning you have an analysis there where trading depends heavily on the factor of influence that is about to come
Based on all that i would like to know why these factors do not play a great role in your analysis and you stick mostly to the maths of the equation like FIb support and retracment levels.
for me it is strange...two systems and both work soundly to a near accurate measure
Thanks again for sticking to Eur USD this week
thanks for the Great analysis as usual. I see in some of your Tech Analysis for some while now that incumbing factors as Some kind of report like non farm for example does not refect on your analysis in a major way in the long run of course. I am baffled how it is so in the long run meaning, yes they have an immediate reponse when report or factor is out but then everything goes back to as the way it should be, according to your analysis.
I also follow Mr Liu and for him those influential factors seems to the the cathalist basis for trading in one direction or the other. Meaning you have an analysis there where trading depends heavily on the factor of influence that is about to come
Based on all that i would like to know why these factors do not play a great role in your analysis and you stick mostly to the maths of the equation like FIb support and retracment levels.
for me it is strange...two systems and both work soundly to a near accurate measure
Thanks again for sticking to Eur USD this week