My questions were in response to hoodles statement. He said Dec couldn't prove and you still have not shown me he couldn't prove.
You have said yourself it's not impossible to make them numbers so that's fine.
He stated no one knew where funds where. My response was who was asked or denied.
Now you have said you were, but your not a client so why would he show you? So again show me in screenshot a client asking him where the funds are and him denying the request? I did state before funds were frozen aswell don't forget!
Hoodle was going on about the Tesco driver in such a sarcastic way.
I still find his former employment irrelevant and I mentioned the linkedin although I have not seen it because I know Tesco was not his last job and you all have mentioned it multiple times (because of course you can't be a forex messiah after working at Tescos)
Hoodle then closed his statement with ramblings about the update about no longer trading, which again were false so I merely corrected him. Assumption of why the update was made which made no sense because no trading was taking place whilst under investigation.
So you answer to number 5 is fine but it's nothing we did not know.
CONCLUSION
(You sound like a politician.)
hoodles made a speculative statement which I correctly responded too and then you have responded to me with a lot of substance without actually giving any evidence to prove me wrong.
Your use of logical fallacies is quite impressive! I mean it's almost like fallacies bingo at this point.
Declan should have been providing proof of trades all along why did he not do this? What did he have to hide? He did nothing wrong, he's trading client's money and making a profit. It's simple though the burden of proof is not for me - It's for Declan to prove he did actually do what he said he was doing and provide the transaction reports to clients like he should have done all of long. At present these reports have never been seen by any one client or not. Declan will never post here so if a client had seen this information all they have to do is come here and share the information the argument of if trades did or did not happen is over.
Your lack of rationality is amazing - it's not impossible no, neither is Declan becoming the next Prime Minister is that going to happen? Highly doubtful. Could Declan be making on average 3% a day? Highly doubtful.
Fine. Fine. I'm not a client he would not have shown me. There are people in this friend and people I know personally he would have shown though - None of these has come forward and
His former employment is irrelevant - fine agreed. If Declan thought it was important enough to delete one linked in profile and update another about his Tesco job 5 years ago he could have spent a few more minutes updating it with all his relevant trading experience and training - it's obviously a pressing matter to him over the last week.
Oh wait no he could not have done this - he has no devices the police has them. Maybe he asked his legal representatives to update it for him?
I think Hoodle was rambling on about this update from Declan when he said "Once all funds are retrieved we will NOT be carrying on and this business will be closed."
I'll agree with you that there is no reason why this update was made and Declan could have since changed his mind and will continue his business with no FCA authorisation, FSCS cover and against the law.
.
Conclusion
It's possible we're going to have Priminster Declan Nowell in the future! He will drag this country out of debt and make so much money no one in this country will need to work again. I CANNOT WAIT!