1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

If the CFTC does this, say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

Discussion in 'Forex Articles' started by Pharaoh, Jan 15, 2010.

  1. Pharaoh

    Pharaoh Colonel

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    19,656
    Likes Received:
    2,201
    If the CFTC does this,
    Say goodbye to retail forex in the USA

    Regulations: Some good, one questionable, one fatal to the industry
    by Pharaoh

    Obsessed with writing


    Several FPA members wrote in to warn people about some new proposed regulations coming from the CFTC. Since I've already dissected some of the NFA's nasty little surprises, the FPA asked me to take a look at this and share it with the members.


    I've always had mixed feelings about government regulation. A certain amount is necessary for the safety and well being of the people, but too much can damage whole sections of business, the economy, and even personal freedoms. Sometimes, too much safety is a bad thing. People need to be free to take some risks and make a few mistakes without Big Brother hovering over their shoulders.

    These new regulations proposed are a mixed bag. Some are very good, one is open to question, and one will do an absolutely huge amount of damage to retail trading in the USA.


    The good parts

    Currently, the regulations clearly state that forex account managers need to be registered except when they don't. They state that IBs need to be registered except when they don't. These types need to be registered with the SEC (or not) and/or the NFA (or not). There are even brokers that claim to be based in the USA that are finding excuse after excuse for not being registered anywhere. The current rules have a lot of holes in them and the growing number of forex Ponzi scams and other forex frauds in the USA clearly shows the need for making sure that these people are all registered somewhere.

    The new rules proposed will require registration of all FCMs (Futures Commodity Merchants) and RFEDs (Retail Foreign Exchange Dealers). Additionally, IBs (Introducing Brokers), CTAs (Commodity Trading Advisors), CPOs (Commodity Pool Operators), and APs (Associated Persons) would need to register. If I'm reading the proposal correctly, APs would include those who solicit orders - pretty much anyone not involved with people or companies in any of the other categories who is more than a clerk or secretary. As an added bonus, an IB that introduces forex transactions to an RFED or FCM must be guaranteed by the RFED or FCM.

    Another excellent feature of these proposed regulations is that they clarify that the CFTC does have proper jurisdiction to pursue forex fraud cases. Some scammers with bright lawyers were exploiting vaguely worded laws regarding whether or not the CFTC had jurisdiction on forex transactions that rolled over rather than only for cases involving delivery of currency may actually take place. The new rules clarify the scope of the CFTC's power and will enhance the CFTC's ability to bring these people to justice.

    There is only one real exception to the registration requirements. Entities that are “otherwise regulated” such as those registered with the SEC and properly licensed financial institutions can continue to offer forex trading accounts under their existing registrations.

    So, once this part becomes law and goes into effect, all forex brokerages in the USA will have to be registered somewhere. All forex account managers in the USA will have to be registered. All US based investment pools claiming to be trading forex will have to be registered. All IBs to registered brokerages will have to be registered. At that point, not being registered will be the quickest way to spot many scammers.


    This won't stop scams, but it will make life harder for scammers. If they try to fly under the radar and don't register, it will be simpler to report them and there won't be so many questions about which agency has jurisdiction to drop the hammer on them. Only more elaborate scams like the one run by Bernie Madoff will be able register and thus to survive undetected for extended periods. Some will move offshore, but many US investors are wary of offshore investments, so that should reduce the number of potential victims.

    I wholeheartedly endorse this part of the proposed rules. These companies and people have access to other people's money. Those with such access need to be licensed, registered, and regulated.


    The questionable part

    If you've ever thought about starting up your own brokerage in the USA, I hope you've got a pile of money. The NFA already imposed minimum capital requirements, but there are some brokerages in the US who have managed to find ways around NFA registration and thus have avoided NFA requirements. The CFTC wants to impose some new minimum capital requirements. FCMs and RFEDs would need to maintain a net capital of at least $20 million, plus 5% of any amount of retail customer liabilities that exceed $10 million.

    I see two potential problems here. The first is that getting $20 million for a startup brokerage would not be a simple task. Setting the minimum capital requirement that high helps the biggest brokerages by reducing the number of new companies could form and compete with them. The second problem is that this could easily make smaller and otherwise well regulated companies move offshore. Some of these will set up shop in places with little or no regulation. This moves both jobs and money out of the USA.

    I'd prefer to see a scaled in capital requirement for startup brokerages while having those below the final minimum be under higher levels of scrutiny. This would give startups more of a chance while providing safeguards against brokerages closing up shop in the middle of the night and running off with client funds.


    And now, the worst part

    Above, I said that too much safety is a bad thing. Hidden away amongst some wonderful regulations to help protect people against many of the more common scams is a little surprise that could spell the end of much retail forex trading at US brokerages.

    The plan is to set the maximum leverage for US retail forex to 10:1. Just so that we are clear that this is not me slipping a digit, that's Ten to One.

    I love risk management. I can take make the worst trading decisions in the world and only lose money at an incredibly slow pace. Risk management is a good thing, but this is ridiculous.

    Just like NFA's anti-hedging and FIFO rules that interfere with stops, this is stripping away the right to make one's own informed (or uninformed) decisions. Some brokers who know that their customers will take all their money out of the USA have found limited ways around the Hedging and FIFO restrictions, but there won't be a way around this. Once again, in order to protect us, the government is taking away all the sharp tools in the shop so that children can play safely around the power equipment.

    This will provide some limited protection foolish newbies who have been known to instantly wipe out their life savings with a mouseclick, but the world can't be designed to protect every person from every possible mistake. The government's regulatory role in the forex market should be to protect us from fiscal fraud, not from being able to click buy or sell with some leverage.

    Let's do some math. Suppose you have just over $10,000 in your account. Let's ignore spread for a moment to simplify the math. Under 10:1, you can open only 1 lot. That's $100,000 of an USDxxx pair. If it goes a few pips against you, then there's not enough money in your account and your broker could give you a margin call. If it goes 50 pips in your favor and you move your SL to breakeven (thus, your current risk is only your profit and nothing else assuming your broker is good at honoring stops) or even to +10 pips (thus locking in $100 profit and having your only risk be $400 of your profit), you won't have enough money to open a second lot (or even a single minilot) if you want to scale into a good position.

    Using tight risk management as I've described elsewhere (1% of account balance) and a 20 pip stop, you should be able to place a single trade for 5 minilots in a $10,000 account. Under 10:1, you would be able to open (at most) a second position. Even if you have profit locked in, you wouldn't be able to open a third position for this amount.

    In my opinion, this restriction is both stupid and insane. I wonder what those big brokers that will have less local competition due to the capital requirements will think when even more forex traders move their money offshore. How many US jobs will this cost if it is implemented?

    What's next? 10:1 leverage on all other commodities?


    What to do

    It's not a law yet. There's still time to complaint and try to stop this.

    Before I tell you where to complain, be aware: All comments sent to the CFTC on this topic will be very public. Ranting about government conspiracies won't help. Typing profanity IN ALL CAPS is very tempting in this case, but it won't help. Ten well worded individual letters will carry more weight than 100 copied and pasted letters or even a single petition with hundreds of signatures. I would be honored if you do quote some of this article and/or include a link to it in your complaint, but please also express your feelings in your own words too.

    According to the rather lengthy (193 pages) document detailing these proposed rules, this is how to complain:


    You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3038-AC61, by any of the following methods:
    • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    • E-mail: secretary@www.cftc.gov. Include “Regulation of Retail Forex” in the subject line of the message.
    • Fax: (202) 418-5521.
    • Mail: Send to David Stawick, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581.
    • Courier: Same as Mail above.
    All comments received will be posted without change to U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, including any personal information provided.


    Please, write something and submit it. Even a few sentences. Focus on what that 10:1 rule will do to your trading. Tell them how much money you may move to an offshore broker. Tell them they are costing jobs. Tell them the really good rules closing registration loopholes won't matter so much if there aren't any US forex businesses left to register.

    If you come up with any additional arguments against this rule, please share them in this thread.

    Don't wait. Get started writing now.


    CFTC Press Release seeking public comments

    Rules proposal in the Federal Register
     
    #1 Pharaoh, Jan 15, 2010
    Lasted edited by : Jan 13, 2016
  2. ernest8fingers

    ernest8fingers Master Sergeant

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    7
    gimme back my BULLETS

    I get the feeling that our "government" wants to kill American Forex in order to force American investors back into the stock market? What next? Regulate how I wipe my arse? I am fast becoming a Forex militant. I have fired off 3-4 emails to Larry DICKMAN of the NFA asking for clarification( I was very polite too) and my emails were deleted without being read. I gave up asking. If you TELL me I MUST do "this"- I automatically want to do the "other". I dont need to be coddled by anyone. I will fail or succeed at my own pace and highly resent anyone forcing their will on my options. Of course those in power could care less. Does anyone know where I might by a pound of enriched Uranium? LOL. BTW-nice work Pharaoh.
     
  3. Ricex

    Ricex Sergeant

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    2
    This really is the 'modern' way of thinking and it makes me sick, lets take everything down to the lowest common denominator, this is why people are losing the ability to think and take responsibility for themselves. It is pervasive and detrimental to the health of society and should be fought and defeated wherever it's found. This 'dumbing down' of humankind will have us reading goverment guidance pamphlets before we cook an egg! it needs to be engaged at all levels and exposed as complete lunacy. The emperor has no clothes.....

    Don't get me started on 'political correctness'......

    Great article Pharaoh, I don't live in the states but if there is anything I can do to help you guys, let me know.
     
  4. Pharaoh

    Pharaoh Colonel

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    19,656
    Likes Received:
    2,201
    Write in and tell them that the French are calling Americans wimps for placing in such silly restrictions. Maybe that will shock them enough to trigger some rethinking.
     
  5. westofpluto

    westofpluto Recruit

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Clarification?

    Perhaps you can clarify? Would the 10:1 margin restriction apply just to US traders who have accounts in US brokers? Or would it apply to US traders even if they use an overseas broker?

    When the CFTC implemented their silly no hedging rule, traders at brokers like FXCM US just jumped ship to open accounts at FXCM UK, where that silly rule doesn't exist. Would the same thing happen here - ie if we just trade through a UK broker like FXCM UK can we get around this?

    I don't know any traders who still trade through US brokers now that the new rules have made it absurd to do so.
     
  6. westofpluto

    westofpluto Recruit

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. LEXngton

    LEXngton Corporal

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thank you, thank you thank you, Pharaoh for pointing out these new proposed regulations and the doomsday of US retail forex if 10:1 leverage rule comes into effect.

    I have already sent in my email to secretary@www.cftc.gov expressing my total dissagreement with the new 10:1 leverage and I hope everyone who would be effected will do the same. It will be the end of my forex trading with US brokers, I'm not super rich. Sure I can, at least for now, move to foreign brokers but the US broker I have now is by far the best for the type of trading I do, and I have tried soooooo many, both US and foreign. Just as I find a good thing this ridiculous rule would snatch it away.

    These type of regulations, ones that attempt to "protect" us here in USA, are petty and futile. We will always find ways around them in the end, i.e. internet betting, which is not allowed in the USA yet Americans find a way to do it anyway. Come on government, let us live like adults and learn from our own mistakes.
     
    #7 LEXngton, Jan 15, 2010
    Lasted edited by : Jan 13, 2016
  8. Pharaoh

    Pharaoh Colonel

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    19,656
    Likes Received:
    2,201
    Westofpluto,
    The CFCT can only regulate US brokerages. Of course, wait until enough money starts moving overseas and then there could easily be some future regs to help "protect citizens" from risking money offshore. That's why we need to torpedo this rule now - otherwise, when the money starts flowing out of the country, they'll find some other ways to "help" us.

    Don't think it can happen? The USA is one of the only countries in the world with an "Exit Tax". If you try to move out with too much money (your money, all taxes already paid), Uncle Sam wants you to have a little chat with his minions at the IRS.
     
  9. Liquid

    Liquid Recruit

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Weak Dollar Intent

    The government officials aren't as dumb as everyone thinks. This is just another technique to make the dollar weak to help our dying manufacturing sector: cheap dollar = more affordable goods overseas - anything to make the politicians look good by putting up good looking economic numbers. The president, Congress, and the Fed can talk all day long about "strong dollar policy", but at the end of the day the result will be similar to quantitative easing........a worthless buck!

    The writing is on the wall - it has been for quite some time. Diversify offshore before currency controls are imposed. :unhappy:
     
  10. Music Man

    Music Man Corporal

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    CFX members are happily not going to affected, but I'm going to send my protest anyway.

    It is really getting hard to practice capitalism in this country.

    MM
     

Share This Page