Aleksey_Ivanov
Private, 1st Class
- Messages
- 91
Dear friends! I want to sincerely help you and dispel your illusions.
1) When you look in the market (or somewhere else, on some channel, etc.) at the description of any product (indicator or robot), you give priority (buy) to the product, the seller of which presented the most possible a long series of positive transactions based on the use of this product. And you think you made the right choice. But don't be so naive. The seller can choose from one hundred series of transactions, 99 series of which are losing, one winning series of transactions and present it in the description of his product. And this is what almost all salespeople do because they need to sell their product. I don't do that because my products are designed for the thinking consumer.
2) Optimization of the robot, which gives an exponential growth of the deposit, when billions are obtained from a hundred dollars, this is, in essence, just an adjustment to the previous history. When new data comes in that goes beyond the history of optimization (i.e. you start to actually trade), then such a robot with a 100% guarantee will bring losses. They buy such robots, in general, suckers. Friends, do not be suckers, i.e. do not lose your money neither on the purchase of such robots, nor when playing on the stock exchange with their help. Many sellers, in general, simply write bright clips, where the stories of allegedly positive transactions of their product and the frantic growth of the deposit are clearly unfolding in the drawn terminal. Some sellers do the same programmatically. If someone had such robots, then no one would sell them. This must be understood, and not wishful thinking.
3) I (a professional scientist, not some schoolboy) sell products with algorithms, which are my own original developments based on a scientific approach ( https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/10955 ,
https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/11158
https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/12891 ) to the study of the foreign exchange market and stock market, which, by the way, no one has done yet. All existing models of the foreign exchange market are not scientific, but simply "shamanic dances with tambourines." Trust me as a scientist. But people tend to buy products (at least robots, at least indicators) with popular algorithms “tested” by time, i.e. well-known strategies and calculation formulas. At the same time, they hope that the popularity of algorithms will provide them with a profit. This is also a naive fallacy. After all, if there were well-known formulas and algorithms that would bring profit in all market conditions, then everyone would become millionaires, which is not observed. On the contrary, in the reality hidden from suckers, all traders (using "time-tested" algorithms) either mark time in one place or lose money. Therefore, among the popular mathematical algorithms (even the most sophisticated ones, such as some kind of neural networks, etc.), there are no algorithms that consistently provide profit, and with a change in the state of the market, they begin to incur losses. Profitable algorithms should be looked for, just the opposite, among the original little-known developments, which are my products. https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/741637
1) When you look in the market (or somewhere else, on some channel, etc.) at the description of any product (indicator or robot), you give priority (buy) to the product, the seller of which presented the most possible a long series of positive transactions based on the use of this product. And you think you made the right choice. But don't be so naive. The seller can choose from one hundred series of transactions, 99 series of which are losing, one winning series of transactions and present it in the description of his product. And this is what almost all salespeople do because they need to sell their product. I don't do that because my products are designed for the thinking consumer.
2) Optimization of the robot, which gives an exponential growth of the deposit, when billions are obtained from a hundred dollars, this is, in essence, just an adjustment to the previous history. When new data comes in that goes beyond the history of optimization (i.e. you start to actually trade), then such a robot with a 100% guarantee will bring losses. They buy such robots, in general, suckers. Friends, do not be suckers, i.e. do not lose your money neither on the purchase of such robots, nor when playing on the stock exchange with their help. Many sellers, in general, simply write bright clips, where the stories of allegedly positive transactions of their product and the frantic growth of the deposit are clearly unfolding in the drawn terminal. Some sellers do the same programmatically. If someone had such robots, then no one would sell them. This must be understood, and not wishful thinking.
3) I (a professional scientist, not some schoolboy) sell products with algorithms, which are my own original developments based on a scientific approach ( https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/10955 ,
https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/11158
https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/12891 ) to the study of the foreign exchange market and stock market, which, by the way, no one has done yet. All existing models of the foreign exchange market are not scientific, but simply "shamanic dances with tambourines." Trust me as a scientist. But people tend to buy products (at least robots, at least indicators) with popular algorithms “tested” by time, i.e. well-known strategies and calculation formulas. At the same time, they hope that the popularity of algorithms will provide them with a profit. This is also a naive fallacy. After all, if there were well-known formulas and algorithms that would bring profit in all market conditions, then everyone would become millionaires, which is not observed. On the contrary, in the reality hidden from suckers, all traders (using "time-tested" algorithms) either mark time in one place or lose money. Therefore, among the popular mathematical algorithms (even the most sophisticated ones, such as some kind of neural networks, etc.), there are no algorithms that consistently provide profit, and with a change in the state of the market, they begin to incur losses. Profitable algorithms should be looked for, just the opposite, among the original little-known developments, which are my products. https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/741637
The indicator demonstrates the current state of the market in a clear and covering all characteristic price scales.
