Pepperstone states our stance on closing our trades in section 14.6 of our Product Disclosure Statement.
This section covers many different aspects of what can happen in a margin call. Importantly it covers when a client fails to meet a margin call (when the account is below 90% margin level) and has not placed further funds in the account so as to withstand any form of adverse gap when the market opens.
Failures to close margin calls are generally handled by the trading platform, but we reserve the right to do this manually in extenuating circumstances.
Kind Regards,
Pepperstone Support
Thanks for the clarification. I had a chance to
read that section and also skim through some other relevant sections. I'm left with more questions than answers.
1) Under a
margin call situation, the trader is warned that they must deposit more funds (or close positions) to move their funds above a margin call level. No trades are actually closed
Under a
stop out situation, that is when positions are actually closed. Usually one or more positions are closed out with specific logic (e.g. largest loser, last opened trade closed first, etc until positions are brought above the stop out level, or all trades closed out. This is disclosed in the PDS.
According to Section 15.8 (Margin Calls), Pepperstone's Margin level is 90% and Stop level is 20%. You allowed the client to open the positions and hold them until the market closed. But let's say that the market was still open.
If you insisted on wanting to close positions to obtain more margin, you would only need to close enough to bring the margin level back above 90%. Only 1 trade would have needed to be closed to get the required margin.
This tactic of closing trades that were within margin/stop levels in itself is questionable. You advertised and set your margin/stop levels already and did not notify your entire client base of any updated changes. Then, did you give them reasonable amount of time to be able to deposit more funds (again, assuming the markets were still open)? How was this in the best interest of the client?
2) How were you able to close the position while the market was closed?
I think section 18 (Trading Hours) of your PDS covers this.
Wouldn't you have to wait until the market re-opened at least 1 incoming tick to then close any positions? Or if you truly wanted the positions closed, to have closed the positions prior to the market close on Friday?
I would certainly like to see the round-trip, post trade trace report on any such trades. That might provide a more rational explanation as to how such a sequence of events were actually implemented.
Oh, wait. scroll back up to section 8: "What is a CFD Transaction?" 8.1 states
A CFD is an agreement between yourself and the provider (Pepperstone Group Limited) to exchange the difference in value from when the contract is opened to when it is closed. If the value of the CFD has moved in your favour, you will be paid an amount into your trading account, should the value of the CFD move against your position, the value will be deducted from your account.
[emphasis mine].
Rather than jump to conclusions, I would like to see if Pepperstone or anyone for that matter care to demonstrate how a conflict of interest would be avoided in such situations.