I totally agree with regarding proving the case beyond reasonable doubt, well said. However, Turki reported that the company is totally ignoring him (which I think it's hard to proove), the man has deposited loads of money and they are ignoring the client. Think about it- what would a civial court would rule in such scenario?
As a money manager (are you?) you should know that a company with no regulation with employees that has no licenses for giving any investment advice- HFX has already failed there! They pretended to be regulated and their employees are managing clients funds and giving investment advice, isn't against the law?