ruseneca
Master Sergeant
- Messages
- 348
"Same plot, different actors".
It seems that they target forex newbies, disregarding of their financial background. These people are professionals, probably WallStreet guys, trained to convince people how could they benefit from markets, especially trading binary options which are much more simplified way to trade on markets and eventually, gain some money.
It is clear that their intention is to empty client's account as noone would ever propose a "recovery plan" with 100% of client's capital involved in a single binary option. In other cases, 100% of capital is distributed to several options without any logic.
My question is the same ( as there is already a case against that company )...Why client accepts these "signals" and place options as per "company's scenario" and not as per his own expectations. Also, how many people process deposits several times after losing their 2-3 deposits, in spite of these promises for some "recovery". What a person will go to the bank, apply for a loan and "gamble" it? It is so important to manage your capital. Well, the person has already invested into a retirement fund and he risks his retirement money to invest in the same company which has lost thousands of his own loan. That must be a joke!!!! I cannot understand why people trust them, instead of enforcing the some "tone" in communication when a broker asks the client to risk more and more money.
It is sickening to read what brokers had written and there's just shyly agreement from client's side, disregarding of the number of losing trades that company's managers have indirectly placed.
I would definitely vote "Guilty" because there are enough evidence that the client has been misleaded. The promises for VIP account have not been kept. Instead of explaining the high risk to the client, he is asked to take a loan and process another deposit with unreal "recovery plan" which is pretty much the same as these, proposed to him before. Asking client to allocate all of his funds into a single binary option is a pure gambling. In stead of leaving the client to trade, brokers stick to the plan to make him gamble.
From what I read in the files that the client has uploaded, I cannot say that it is unethical or unprofessional to ask client to go in a debt. This is a crime! You just mislead the client with a false service to steal his/her money. They offer binary options trading but it seems that they ask clients to gamble. Trading differs from gambling!
It seems that they target forex newbies, disregarding of their financial background. These people are professionals, probably WallStreet guys, trained to convince people how could they benefit from markets, especially trading binary options which are much more simplified way to trade on markets and eventually, gain some money.
It is clear that their intention is to empty client's account as noone would ever propose a "recovery plan" with 100% of client's capital involved in a single binary option. In other cases, 100% of capital is distributed to several options without any logic.
My question is the same ( as there is already a case against that company )...Why client accepts these "signals" and place options as per "company's scenario" and not as per his own expectations. Also, how many people process deposits several times after losing their 2-3 deposits, in spite of these promises for some "recovery". What a person will go to the bank, apply for a loan and "gamble" it? It is so important to manage your capital. Well, the person has already invested into a retirement fund and he risks his retirement money to invest in the same company which has lost thousands of his own loan. That must be a joke!!!! I cannot understand why people trust them, instead of enforcing the some "tone" in communication when a broker asks the client to risk more and more money.
It is sickening to read what brokers had written and there's just shyly agreement from client's side, disregarding of the number of losing trades that company's managers have indirectly placed.
I would definitely vote "Guilty" because there are enough evidence that the client has been misleaded. The promises for VIP account have not been kept. Instead of explaining the high risk to the client, he is asked to take a loan and process another deposit with unreal "recovery plan" which is pretty much the same as these, proposed to him before. Asking client to allocate all of his funds into a single binary option is a pure gambling. In stead of leaving the client to trade, brokers stick to the plan to make him gamble.
From what I read in the files that the client has uploaded, I cannot say that it is unethical or unprofessional to ask client to go in a debt. This is a crime! You just mislead the client with a false service to steal his/her money. They offer binary options trading but it seems that they ask clients to gamble. Trading differs from gambling!