Nuno Alves
I am Diogo!
- Messages
- 13
Consegui uma foto
-
Please try to select the correct prefix when making a new thread in this folder.
Discuss is for general discussions of a financial company or issues related to companies.
Info is for things like "Has anyone heard of Company X?" or "Is Company X legit or not?"
Compare is for things like "Which of these 2 (or more) companies is best?"
Searching is for things like "Help me pick a broker" or "What's the best VPS out there for trading?"
Problem is for reporting an issue with a company. Please don't just scream "CompanyX is a scam!" It is much more useful to say "I can't withdraw my money from Company X" or "Company Y is not honoring their refund guarantee" in the subject line.
Keep Problem discussions civil and lay out the facts of your case. Your goal should be to get your problem resolved or reported to the regulators, not to see how many insults you can put into the thread.More info coming soon.
Problem www.ioption.com, Diogo Carvalho
- Thread starter raimmaria
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ioption.com
I am having an issue with a company
Nuno Alves
I am Diogo!
- Messages
- 13
JC Batista
Banned
- Messages
- 7
isso mesmo Joana
Mr. Leonardo arrived with meaningless information and naive knowing what was being discussed at the FPA continued to cover up and defend your employee thief .
I keep saying to iOption is conniving with these scammers but would not be allowing free access to my account and other future victims.
Mr. Carlos was to have already been fired the company and not continue to operate and more free to disregard accounting for iOption, disrespecting and offending FPA, me and Mr. Ali MaruB
with all freedom and low mood which is peculiar to his bad character
EMAIL RESPONSE OF MR LEONARDO
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:11:46 +0300
Subject: Our response
From: leonard@ioption.com
To: rmasalves1@hotmail.com
Hello Sn. Santos,
Firstly apologies for taking a little longer than hoped, to get back to you.
I have been through your account, line by line, and believe that I now have a clear understanding as to what went on.
Your account was traded aggressively and for a time you made a lot of profits.
You requested a withdrawal of $2000, your original total deposits, and that was sent to your Credit card. You then requested a further withdrawal of $2000, which was returned to your Moneybookers account. This represents a 100% profit on your original investment. Any further withdraws that you might have requested, would have needed to be transacted via your bank, by wire, as Moneybookers could not have handled your funds, but I understand that would have made you liable to a 17% tax charge by your country’s authorities. A solution to that problem would have been to open a different money transferring facility, and that could have been OKPAY. It was suggested to you that you should open such an account, in order that larger amounts of withdrawals could be sent to you. No funds were ever transferred by ioption to your OKPAY account.
In the meantime some very aggressive trading, that initially increased your account to over $28000, lost all the profits, leaving your account empty.
You need to raise the question of how your account was traded with your adviser Snr. Diogo. His association with iOption is one of an affiliate. That means he introduces business to us, for which he get a fee. Our account Manager Carlos Goncalves introduced Snr. Diogo to you, and that in hind site, was inappropriate. We do not offer a managed client account facility. It is not within our Terms and Conditions of trading. The arrangement that you had with Snr. Diogo was one between yourselves and did not involve iOption in any way. Neither Snr. Goncalves, nor Snr. Diogo were paid or received payment or commission on your traded account.
From the Skype transcript you posted on FPA, Snr Diogo admitted to you that he over traded and should have been more careful. The acts of your agent are not the acts of iOption.
In conclusion iOption are sorry that you had this unfortunate experience, and still despite that, you were able to receive 100% return on your original investment. We are confident that our actions never compromised the integrity of your account.
Leonard Gibbins
Technical Support
leonard@ioption.com
Tel: +357.220.30679
Fax:+ 357.220.30642
Binary Options Trading | Online Trading | iOption?
I keep saying to iOption is conniving with these scammers but would not be allowing free access to my account and other future victims.
Mr. Carlos was to have already been fired the company and not continue to operate and more free to disregard accounting for iOption, disrespecting and offending FPA, me and Mr. Ali MaruB
with all freedom and low mood which is peculiar to his bad character
EMAIL RESPONSE OF MR LEONARDO
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:11:46 +0300
Subject: Our response
From: leonard@ioption.com
To: rmasalves1@hotmail.com
Hello Sn. Santos,
Firstly apologies for taking a little longer than hoped, to get back to you.
I have been through your account, line by line, and believe that I now have a clear understanding as to what went on.
Your account was traded aggressively and for a time you made a lot of profits.
You requested a withdrawal of $2000, your original total deposits, and that was sent to your Credit card. You then requested a further withdrawal of $2000, which was returned to your Moneybookers account. This represents a 100% profit on your original investment. Any further withdraws that you might have requested, would have needed to be transacted via your bank, by wire, as Moneybookers could not have handled your funds, but I understand that would have made you liable to a 17% tax charge by your country’s authorities. A solution to that problem would have been to open a different money transferring facility, and that could have been OKPAY. It was suggested to you that you should open such an account, in order that larger amounts of withdrawals could be sent to you. No funds were ever transferred by ioption to your OKPAY account.
In the meantime some very aggressive trading, that initially increased your account to over $28000, lost all the profits, leaving your account empty.
You need to raise the question of how your account was traded with your adviser Snr. Diogo. His association with iOption is one of an affiliate. That means he introduces business to us, for which he get a fee. Our account Manager Carlos Goncalves introduced Snr. Diogo to you, and that in hind site, was inappropriate. We do not offer a managed client account facility. It is not within our Terms and Conditions of trading. The arrangement that you had with Snr. Diogo was one between yourselves and did not involve iOption in any way. Neither Snr. Goncalves, nor Snr. Diogo were paid or received payment or commission on your traded account.
From the Skype transcript you posted on FPA, Snr Diogo admitted to you that he over traded and should have been more careful. The acts of your agent are not the acts of iOption.
In conclusion iOption are sorry that you had this unfortunate experience, and still despite that, you were able to receive 100% return on your original investment. We are confident that our actions never compromised the integrity of your account.
Leonard Gibbins
Technical Support
leonard@ioption.com
Tel: +357.220.30679
Fax:+ 357.220.30642
Binary Options Trading | Online Trading | iOption?
Master Yoda
Captain
- Messages
- 2,929
Unless ioption is cooperating with these two people and this is a one big act
Pharaoh
Brigadier General
- Messages
- 20,310
That is an unfortunate possibility. The fact that some of the bogus posts came from Israel does lend credence to the possibility that Diogo is working from inside the offices of iOption.
Unfortunately, proving whether or not iOption was directly cooperating in Diogo's activities won't be easy.
Unfortunately, proving whether or not iOption was directly cooperating in Diogo's activities won't be easy.
Master Yoda
Captain
- Messages
- 2,929
Any news about the court case?
Pharaoh
Brigadier General
- Messages
- 20,310
Who would it be against? Without proof of complicity by iOption, all we have for certain is Diogo trading in a crazy fashion, making some money, and then wiped out the account. If there is a screenshot of account history showing money going to an OK Pay account, that would prove that Diogo is also a thief, but still doesn't prove iOption itself assisted his criminal activities.
I do believe that iOption deserves a warning on it's page for allowing 3rd party trading in the absence of an LPOA. That is dangerous, both the the trader and the account manager. iOption also deserves a warning since it appears that they haven't yet cancelled any financial arrangements they have with Diogo and Carlos in spite of all the issues that have been caused.
I disagree Pharoa for one reasone the mail proves a coer up the point is if they assited or not that nothing was done by them ,they still employee Diogo and Carlos ,by that they support this action even if they are not involed.see it as a goverment that one of its minsters was caught in coruption and nothing was done only formely declariotion that it was not ok,does it take the responsiblty from all the goverment for the doing of one ogf it members
Answer is yes ,as long that no steps were done its declare of weare guilty also,and that is good enough dont you think?
Any compamy has to have norms and ethics if they faile to pass it to its workers they have responsibilty first because they did not pass it
secondly by not takeing any drastic steps in the subject do you agree that appointing third party with out any legeal agrement is bad enough here is the crime ,doing nothing only a declarition of a cover up here is the guilt.plus the israeli ip in the spamming in this thred also recently ,what can they say about that "we can not control our workers" so if they can not control there worker in this what else can't they control?
Now when Diogo was asked why he was apointed he answerd he done it before and he is expirence trader,which is oporation show he is not how many time did they did it before it came to our knowlege how many Mrs Santos are there? being caught once does not cover or clean the doing from before
what about the point that for four mounth he did not ask his half from the gain why?
As ioption representive wrote she got one hundred percent profit showes it is silence money and good enough as one evedince to show the connection betwen ioption and the doing of its workers
Answer is yes ,as long that no steps were done its declare of weare guilty also,and that is good enough dont you think?
Any compamy has to have norms and ethics if they faile to pass it to its workers they have responsibilty first because they did not pass it
secondly by not takeing any drastic steps in the subject do you agree that appointing third party with out any legeal agrement is bad enough here is the crime ,doing nothing only a declarition of a cover up here is the guilt.plus the israeli ip in the spamming in this thred also recently ,what can they say about that "we can not control our workers" so if they can not control there worker in this what else can't they control?
Now when Diogo was asked why he was apointed he answerd he done it before and he is expirence trader,which is oporation show he is not how many time did they did it before it came to our knowlege how many Mrs Santos are there? being caught once does not cover or clean the doing from before
what about the point that for four mounth he did not ask his half from the gain why?
As ioption representive wrote she got one hundred percent profit showes it is silence money and good enough as one evedince to show the connection betwen ioption and the doing of its workers
Similar threads
