AsstModerator
FPA Forums and Reviews Admin
- Messages
- 5,747
My warning about applies to all participants. You just happened to be the one with the most obvious example I saw in the most recent pages of the thread.
Members are allowed to report what they feel is is a scam or a scammer. The FPA doesn't require a documented legal case before someone is permitted to complain about a person or a company in Scam Alerts. To balance this, the FPA doesn't label people or companies as scam without proof. Escalating an issue to the FPA Traders Court requires evidence. The FPA then tries to invite the accused to reply before any further action is taken.
If I took action against everyone who said a broker was a scam without having full evidence posted first, this folder would be mostly empty. Many scammers who are good at limiting access to evidence would be happy that their victims would not be permitted to speak.
I do see Liz was harsh in some of the many posts you reported. So far I haven't seen anything that crossed the boundaries of civilized conduct. If you really want to me examine all of Liz's posts for anything that you do not like, are you offering all of your posts up for the same level of scrutiny?
Please ask the brokers you work for to send official representatives into the discussion. That would improve the chance of reaching an end to this argument.
Members are allowed to report what they feel is is a scam or a scammer. The FPA doesn't require a documented legal case before someone is permitted to complain about a person or a company in Scam Alerts. To balance this, the FPA doesn't label people or companies as scam without proof. Escalating an issue to the FPA Traders Court requires evidence. The FPA then tries to invite the accused to reply before any further action is taken.
If I took action against everyone who said a broker was a scam without having full evidence posted first, this folder would be mostly empty. Many scammers who are good at limiting access to evidence would be happy that their victims would not be permitted to speak.
I do see Liz was harsh in some of the many posts you reported. So far I haven't seen anything that crossed the boundaries of civilized conduct. If you really want to me examine all of Liz's posts for anything that you do not like, are you offering all of your posts up for the same level of scrutiny?
Please ask the brokers you work for to send official representatives into the discussion. That would improve the chance of reaching an end to this argument.