Before I vote, I must ask reporter of this case to show evidence that his account name was Deepak (when he deposited funds) and now it chance to another person name without his notice.
He can prove by showing his daily confirmation emails or deposit transaction report because any broker will accept payment done by owner of trade account holder not from 3rd party.
If broker found making changes of completely different name with or without any request will consider as critical issue.
Because no matter what but broker cannot make complete name correction except spelling mistake correction.
Broker found making complete name change with or without request after deposit funds may count as doing money laundering.
If broker found in guilty of making completely name change after deposit is 100% in fault regardless of it's manipulation activity.
Futuremore, claims of profitable trades closed automatically may consider as fault. if broker confirm it's fault then broker need to restore such closed order without any further delay. Intentionally failed to restore or failed to compensate loss occurred due to brokers technical fault may consider as fault unless broker published force-majeure via email & on public news because such malfunction for sure affected many open orders. Failed to declared on public about force majeure will consider broker in fault.
If broker change Clinet trading account password will consider as cheap act from broker because broker can simply block account to trade from it's manager software.
If broker found doing such cheap act is definitely brokers fault.
That's all my views
Kind regards
Mohit
He can prove by showing his daily confirmation emails or deposit transaction report because any broker will accept payment done by owner of trade account holder not from 3rd party.
If broker found making changes of completely different name with or without any request will consider as critical issue.
Because no matter what but broker cannot make complete name correction except spelling mistake correction.
Broker found making complete name change with or without request after deposit funds may count as doing money laundering.
If broker found in guilty of making completely name change after deposit is 100% in fault regardless of it's manipulation activity.
Futuremore, claims of profitable trades closed automatically may consider as fault. if broker confirm it's fault then broker need to restore such closed order without any further delay. Intentionally failed to restore or failed to compensate loss occurred due to brokers technical fault may consider as fault unless broker published force-majeure via email & on public news because such malfunction for sure affected many open orders. Failed to declared on public about force majeure will consider broker in fault.
If broker change Clinet trading account password will consider as cheap act from broker because broker can simply block account to trade from it's manager software.
If broker found doing such cheap act is definitely brokers fault.
That's all my views
Kind regards
Mohit