ruseneca
Master Sergeant
- Messages
- 348
I disagree with you and I think your comments are unfair.
most of the time it is the same story. push to make a huge deposit to get better deal and signals then nothing.
What "then", @PeterV1, there might not be possibility for "then". By applying for a bonus, you simply reduce your chances to succeed because ahead of you is the so-called "wagering". That is why you say "then nothing". Brokers are aware of this fact and they simply try to manage their risk by providing extremely high bonuses. And most of the time, newbies get in this trap. You are the one who asks for a bonus, the company simply responds to your needs. But if you trade with a bonus, you must agree on some additional terms. And that's it! You have the chance to trade without a bonus.
In case the company put a bonus in your account without your consent, this is cheating, scamming etc. as you have never wanted or requested such bonus in your account.
What I am trying to say here is that Naveen has lost some funds by trading alone. Instread of staying away from the markets, he goes to brokers and asks for bonuses, risk-free trades and some benefits with the idea of recovery. It is in full contradiction as if you want a recovery, you will not put a bonus on top of your deposit. In order to receive a bonus, you should request such. Naveen had not requested his "rightfull" bonus and traded alone. In order to request a new bonus, he simply need to make another deposit.
And all of the above-mentioned facts - the client in aware of them. Despite this, he decides to risk. "Brokers" are there to sell their services and take his deposit. If Naveen would like to make such a deposit, why should brokers stop him?!
There are several different points of view so everyone decides from which one he/she would observe the whole case. That's what I call a "complicated case" because there's not enough evidence that the company is guilty. Trader's actions are these that have provoked several offers from the broker, actually, his will for recovery. And company's brokers could not be classified as "honest" or "angels" because they could have prevented even more losses for the client. So, here, I decided based on what is trader's aim and how he could be acted then.
Your point of view might be different, and this is OK! That is why there's a public vote!