AsstModerator
FPA Forums and Reviews Admin
- Messages
- 5,746
I've formally invited EZTrader to come back to your discussion thread.
EZTrader adheres strictly to the rules and conditions set out by the regulatory body – CySEC. The letter posted in this thread speaks for itself - EZTrader's position is stated clearly there. Furthermore, we feel that unsubstantiated defamatory claims should not be allowed on respectable forums such as this.
Hello XXXX,
Unlike some places, the FPA actively solicits companies to present their side of the issue.
Your own post in the forums says the client wouldn't cooperate, but gave no details. The letter you reference makes claims of defamation without including evidence. Am I supposed to give your post and the letter more weight than a client's claims to the contrary?
I can grant you access to the case thread or else set up a 3 way Email discussion with you and the client. If your claims are true, it would be simple to prove them in either of these ways. This would result in the Scam Alerts thread being edited and moved.
Best regards,
Bill